[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/mNBdKYAjVkPCy9KWFTg7R1lK0vg/
2617024
1798625
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN (#1514)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Permit 0-RTT after Retry and VN (#1514)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iOSu3vdgGgQeQjp78kLqcc5mOjg/
2617022
1793863
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a client send 0-RTT data when receiving Retry? (#1507)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can a client send 0-RTT data when receiving Retry? (#1507)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NVZv5ZxoouZ7AlnUlh_bDf71i8o/
2617021
1792798
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long header + token and PNE (#1535)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Long header + token and PNE (#1535)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zZQeRxaOueK1DHleIspg5ebQqNE/
2617020
1794787
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework Retry packet (#1498)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Rework Retry packet (#1498)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4bbz4RtK1M4SzcAgmn2-7r1foXo/
2617019
1792521
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Must Be Decrypted to Read Initial Token Field (#1492)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet Number Must Be Decrypted to Read Initial Token Field (#1492)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2nd5koXzxFIJFUbwrayiobWHelg/
2617018
1792268
[quicwg/base-drafts] b37554: Rework Retry packet[quicwg/base-drafts] b37554: Rework Retry packet
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/eyBCk35BCy-FcT6h8QrchDs5uro/
2617017
1798624
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use largest_acked consistently (#1611)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fNp7w9LLG23XqrVD8R6C7iKEV2Y/
2617016
1798501
[quicwg/base-drafts] Don't amplify 0-RTT (#1616)[quicwg/base-drafts] Don't amplify 0-RTT (#1616)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/M9wBZanc149lUsMwk_pemUHItyQ/
2617015
1798623
[quicwg/base-drafts] 551d14: Don't amplify 0-RTT[quicwg/base-drafts] 551d14: Don't amplify 0-RTT
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ngv7Pe_Dxixf8YkUSSIAPEQbqTE/
2617014
1798622
[quicwg/base-drafts] Wonky definition of kInitialWindow (#1615)[quicwg/base-drafts] Wonky definition of kInitialWindow (#1615)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iuMaQJCo5g0HAq_8EjrAXr7agNY/
2617013
1798621
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gIyzPHTg7NX8UNWCPwaBFKxzcIY/
2617012
1781712
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5TFcrqRtTTWAbpn13bHuuYpyrHk/
2617011
1781712
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vFVWHdAX9RAg-JVdWQifjKeMkVU/
2617010
1781712
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Need to prevent amplification attack for any case where the server's response is big (#1309)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/K2LOXK6oMDBO1_Z5he9dOQYOSNY/
2617009
1781712
[quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle timeout more precisely (#1614)[quicwg/base-drafts] Define idle timeout more precisely (#1614)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/seKF1dzaPWib-IwkfkwhLuZOmb8/
2617008
1798620
[quicwg/base-drafts] e7e7fa: Define idle timeout more precisely[quicwg/base-drafts] e7e7fa: Define idle timeout more precisely
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0o5wzCvM2en8Wdf9sbT8wbp1Qvg/
2617006
1798619
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yicS038cycYOPwXuIL2w6KxbvAs/
2617005
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/YM6B-ETc7Y0OJZdkozl1j6a3DOU/
2617004
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts] Exceptions to packet coalescing (#1613)[quicwg/base-drafts] Exceptions to packet coalescing (#1613)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/TwyfNxq3371DC85GoGrJIkSCm50/
2617003
1798618
[quicwg/base-drafts] 675231: Exceptions to packet coalescing[quicwg/base-drafts] 675231: Exceptions to packet coalescing
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ux2P_NMWFyWi5MmVeaMCuIQv46w/
2617002
1798617
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Retry or VNego be compound with other packets? (#1292)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can Retry or VNego be compound with other packets? (#1292)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gATdtfJbNydn0FjKst4cfSTm430/
2617001
1780766
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Marten Seemann
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hf5gMvD5u-XaMM2E-YaFlJ__O50/
2617000
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Connection migration should be indistinguishable from a new connection (#203)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0RBUxGHvyvtK0MhU90auDNG87mY/
2616999
1683696
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/M8E82dPTy7UJOL4exsJZ-DfUvN0/
2616989
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IzYqOXO5F4zu5BoiCAGkJmrWFmQ/
2616988
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Marten Seemann
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/B2XGVzAqVQEGQXqpmwOPvKRNtkI/
2616985
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/VtqkLDsNll_NGPqLNV588BgqBMU/
2616984
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/e2I-8AvwrQp3xcinbL_UhexunLU/
2616983
1798608
[quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)[quicwg/base-drafts] are flow control frames really idempotent? (#1612)
Subodh Iyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PyWM7IqG6dwna6jcYUdV2Vft4zk/
2616982
1798608
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long header payload length 16bits (#1577)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long header payload length 16bits (#1577)
janaiyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IeoJZRzGvAvV4MhXUUdPMFW6vxM/
2616960
1796472
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long header payload length 16bits (#1577)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Consider making long header payload length 16bits (#1577)
janaiyengar
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/O-PkcoeJsw6tzTQHxHIqzxESVHA/
2616959
1796472
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1386)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1386)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/drTcAmGneLEaShuT0qvsPuiLFhI/
2616956
1786442
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/7pkPyWQI0Wh4kV0VFc7pkfLqZJQ/
2616955
1798600
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uBd5a4vt2v6x5lF-kB4scOs6VyM/
2616954
1795420
[quicwg/base-drafts] b76760: Stateless reset oracle defense[quicwg/base-drafts] b76760: Stateless reset oracle defense
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vR2Xz1XTApJTJFq9vxgUu6DZTfU/
2616953
1798599
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0RGSfxsvQwdQXxeZ5m_YI5LykGk/
2616945
1795420
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bz0FSX_bmafk1LF-kjJnXCcim18/
2616944
1795420
[quicwg/base-drafts] bd8d09: Remove text, yay[quicwg/base-drafts] bd8d09: Remove text, yay
Martin Thomson
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/sFP0gjh2K4B8-BILujcmEk8PFXQ/
2616943
1798595
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless reset oracle defense (#1554)
ianswett
2018-07-31
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6p8oyAIz7YgE2XS4YvQUF1cIUW8/
2616939
1795420