Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Confused about Fixed Bit in Version Negotiation Packet (#2995)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Confused about Fixed Bit in Version Negotiation Packet (#2995)
Ainiroad
2019-09-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/tUoJzbGaelcDFGENI0go36OnxaM/
2780634
1855588
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)
Marten Seemann
2019-09-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ab_1KtLlgwaEqvsvjhUU2ugPOt4/
2780625
1858048
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)
David Schinazi
2019-09-16
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/v6_0ebgbH4admiYOGWfPt4a8AeQ/
2780619
1858048
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)
Nick Banks
2019-09-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/wRjbgvGAKzLGSrbgIZcx158Xoqs/
2780575
1858048
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-09-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zAhZWYpy5OdjtGE1-WRPPYQDmF4/
2780549
1858018
[quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)[quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING at every encryption level (#3035)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-09-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vRkgk16946tRBvoRj5wYTTUWQFo/
2780547
1858048
[quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING in Initial/Handshake? (#3034)[quicwg/base-drafts] Allow PING in Initial/Handshake? (#3034)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-09-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yWS_OsWt8NtAhspEXzTrhxj36yc/
2780546
1858047
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)
Marten Seemann
2019-09-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vP7h8EjCx_7sYnsRZBZ4ShELCPE/
2780537
1858018
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
2019-09-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/bGS-EHdwyCvhyCkZTI3QfIUa1lw/
2780536
1858018
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)
Marten Seemann
2019-09-15
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/caKtmUpj2uaCOCv9ZtQa9fOvFEs/
2780535
1858018
[quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)[quicwg/base-drafts] Suggest sending empty CRYPTO frames in Initial/Handshake packets (#3033)
Alessandro Ghedini
2019-09-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Cw_cWT-AzYi24iV0TbXdIiU1f7c/
2780497
1858018
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section (#3031)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section (#3031)
Christopher Wood
2019-09-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rcn_NIGmi98AN5UM0i7JO8yKrR0/
2780455
1857957
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section (#3031)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section (#3031)
MikkelFJ
2019-09-14
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/k6eaMFCA4pRY-N0tiGQJtwPsNHc/
2780414
1857957
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Detectable Stateless Resets (#3032)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Detectable Stateless Resets (#3032)
David Schinazi
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kp7yYMeO7cRasvCuy0Y_79mqJsc/
2780350
1857959
[quicwg/base-drafts] Detectable Stateless Resets (#3032)[quicwg/base-drafts] Detectable Stateless Resets (#3032)
martinduke
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ncf_W19kbKeCwwFbnOoYOySzmXk/
2780333
1857959
[quicwg/base-drafts] Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section (#3031)[quicwg/base-drafts] Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section (#3031)
Christopher Wood
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/crdkEF9w7yoakYqaDyhH2b0-4tE/
2780331
1857957
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport parameter registry is too constraining for innovation (#3020)
ianswett
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/MzW3Mk25IYcCI60lUhmqSKTLyCY/
2780261
1857582
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
Christian Huitema
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1Xo9N2ZNHE9BVmx4ZoeyIN0Rn8w/
2780251
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Requirement of an Acknowledgement per Round Trip (#3030)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Requirement of an Acknowledgement per Round Trip (#3030)
ianswett
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CWxyaoDebzEI312hBkn2Ij6hIwo/
2780227
1857921
[quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Requirement of an Acknowledgement per Round Trip (#3030)[quicwg/base-drafts] Remove Requirement of an Acknowledgement per Round Trip (#3030)
Nick Banks
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fdKRoTbqplVCqovUiw8l_T13Szk/
2780223
1857921
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)
MikkelFJ
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5Nk4cPxgcSGuZ4w7iaviss9VD2k/
2780213
1852534
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)
ianswett
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/8RWNVvUD4Hg6RhPXGFK1xnbOBXo/
2780197
1852534
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Skip a packet number when sending one PTO packet (#2952)
ianswett
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/U6RlHb5Aq7kAXiPL6fSK8vGdMho/
2780196
1852534
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kpz3tP09bxSrmDNPQB5xgM2S_WY/
2780150
1857864
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)
Nick Banks
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/SqwM1Q5bZlZKQEsKnSP7FP_t9ag/
2780149
1857864
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nHpf2ZGJd1S1p60-BZzW3IS4Mgw/
2780143
1857864
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NcHXVtLzKp-3EeFrnYf_ErHsKBo/
2780141
1857864
[quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)[quicwg/base-drafts] Packet header fields cannot be omitted (#3029)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1G3SaJc5rslVmKnTGyqf9yCqeNA/
2780122
1857864
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Codes for frame encoding errors (#3027)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Codes for frame encoding errors (#3027)
ianswett
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cQb7PxPZnaOFms4s4S17n2wCPu4/
2780109
1857823
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Confused about Fixed Bit in Version Negotiation Packet (#2995)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Confused about Fixed Bit in Version Negotiation Packet (#2995)
Martin Thomson
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/WYmm7eYsuYSgAEnWxSDgIQfT5wE/
2780056
1855588
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
Kazuho Oku
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/IBdsYonxpgAvr4WWljiQrGpZeFk/
2780044
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
Kazuho Oku
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/kKIwBTyE14kS75slMhqqOC8FgRg/
2780042
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
MikkelFJ
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/gyFdYIf3-QQrys6OcVIHsBzt7wA/
2780041
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
MikkelFJ
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/hLlvlwPbG6skgCunhQJNn7t4rtM/
2780040
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
Kazuho Oku
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yki4YWSJjzZ2yyaLEYSBTcaGK4c/
2780039
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
MikkelFJ
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cbse7DmoH9lTyVPdpWe2m8RmWV0/
2780037
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Requiring per application data in session ticket seems wrong (#3028)
Kazuho Oku
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OeTL3zimvguZ7idDcW5siXE5zt4/
2780035
1857829
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe interaction between QUIC and TLS regarding saved 0-RTT state (#2947)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe interaction between QUIC and TLS regarding saved 0-RTT state (#2947)
MikkelFJ
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/cMA95KGRB823LUyGybSwK_pGJw0/
2780033
1852418
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe interaction between QUIC and TLS regarding saved 0-RTT state (#2947)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe interaction between QUIC and TLS regarding saved 0-RTT state (#2947)
Martin Thomson
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/OcAXtTFeivg6YE3Uamjb_wFuZLA/
2780032
1852418
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe interaction between QUIC and TLS regarding saved 0-RTT state (#2947)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Describe interaction between QUIC and TLS regarding saved 0-RTT state (#2947)
MikkelFJ
2019-09-13
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/XSysoOlBu3KlJ8kuGHGpXFGQ3DE/
2780031
1852418