Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/vI-WySXwC2Qs5XtG2RvX48HlmMw/
2402536
1708290
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Silent close (#61)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Silent close (#61)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/R5AWyTqiAh4gzYgLtbH3nASVj4M/
2402531
1678064
[quicwg/base-drafts] Move stream IDs to the front of frames (#620)[quicwg/base-drafts] Move stream IDs to the front of frames (#620)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ASMrpTS_y98TZYiiIJ1Zx5WoRUg/
2402525
1708571
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type word (#619)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type word (#619)
ekr
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/9HjIKgl1vGvJ8lc2bMuEPXe1g8M/
2402514
1708540
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/o6izyvKnJ6TaCC8SNIyKLvm6ZiI/
2402483
1708555
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit the size of packets (#501)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Limit the size of packets (#501)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fa5Zq6iTySJva108TyWjx3PS24Q/
2402482
1702105
[quicwg/base-drafts][quicwg/base-drafts]
martinthomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ATdMWFHH3NphkJY2S3SCAy2PtE8/
2402481
1708554
[quicwg/base-drafts] aa475c: Some minor editorial improvements[quicwg/base-drafts] aa475c: Some minor editorial improvements
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6RH1CmGBexE8kZZfLT0lZnPU0e4/
2402480
1708553
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Do we need to define a maximum packet size? (#383)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/POYXCSFXfh5ftpUhWEHS28XPwWY/
2402479
1690579
[quicwg/base-drafts] ae3fa1: Limit the size of packets[quicwg/base-drafts] ae3fa1: Limit the size of packets
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/c5J_z6FVCisMD8IX8JHY1MNnfDo/
2402478
1708552
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport: Can QUIC packets become larger than 64K? (#611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport: Can QUIC packets become larger than 64K? (#611)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/fBVQ4mcYN9io6fwGyMKwQvL-b64/
2402477
1708298
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Loosen the MUST requirement to close if an unsent packet is acknowledged (#565)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Loosen the MUST requirement to close if an unsent packet is acknowledged (#565)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6qE-luTlPqq2EZ6N2S3nWyVU0mQ/
2402475
1707093
[quicwg/base-drafts] 35fbea: Loosen the MUST requirement to close if an unsent ...[quicwg/base-drafts] 35fbea: Loosen the MUST requirement to close if an unsent ...
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ix3M2LBLuPt7099E7IZbXn5BpEY/
2402474
1708551
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement around close-on-ack-of-unsent (#564)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] loosen MUST requirement around close-on-ack-of-unsent (#564)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/TAzrEwFHUAkyGuD0DqaJ9D399J4/
2402472
1707039
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Loosen the MUST requirement to close if an unsent packet is acknowledged (#565)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Loosen the MUST requirement to close if an unsent packet is acknowledged (#565)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DgbwoBpGrLPcS0T7BYxhNtqCgCg/
2402473
1707093
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proof of receipt of packets in ACK (#509)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proof of receipt of packets in ACK (#509)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/iHCQXJepBS9voJUFQmLqG4b9RtI/
2402471
1702485
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proof of receipt of packets in ACK (#509)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Proof of receipt of packets in ACK (#509)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/qc6xj2w19PMy-I_1kCC8BM0bQ5w/
2402470
1702485
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Address change and consent to send (#161)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Address change and consent to send (#161)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/jARGli5cMPSNOe4ysPf1T1aL_hQ/
2402467
1682901
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type word (#619)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type word (#619)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/m7qih4nLY05IWNq9IKCUL2aW_iQ/
2402464
1708540
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify mapping of bits to lengths for STREAM frame. Also, re-order (#618)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify mapping of bits to lengths for STREAM frame. Also, re-order (#618)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/6_8l1ibM-hF2f5hvVB0XAMOkccU/
2402461
1708539
[quicwg/base-drafts] 916f81: Clarify mapping of bits to lengths for STREAM fram...[quicwg/base-drafts] 916f81: Clarify mapping of bits to lengths for STREAM fram...
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rhCycuYzx6r8E_mm_MgHc7-soOU/
2402460
1708547
[quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type word (#619)[quicwg/base-drafts] Frame type word (#619)
ekr
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5F8Fm_AQJfCVp7fNnfNrh-hUlcM/
2402447
1708540
[quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify mapping of bits to lengths for STREAM frame. Also, re-order (#618)[quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify mapping of bits to lengths for STREAM frame. Also, re-order (#618)
ekr
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/50P8x2xcusQbqAXOT9Cpqw6Lh6A/
2402446
1708539
[quicwg/wg-materials] 9885f5: Add placeholder information for next interim[quicwg/wg-materials] 9885f5: Add placeholder information for next interim
Lars Eggert
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FZdq-D_UER_NZjdVT-6vxQptgow/
2402430
1708529
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)
Patrick McManus
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/aDdTXN-J0KlOXSdlDBHQoNR_dgw/
2402405
1708415
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)
Lars Eggert
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2Ko72-6oPQ_9aeQpr9uTTB6VnnY/
2402386
1708415
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport: Can QUIC packets become larger than 64K? (#611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport: Can QUIC packets become larger than 64K? (#611)
MikkelFJ
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/4fU3Dgc9pZml36SgAi36NEg-1Co/
2402376
1708298
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zh6G2cwqN-OjAitSZ3ghEb80iUs/
2402374
1708290
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/3NyFNbS6IwCgeWVuXTCd2dXwCpc/
2402373
1708415
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport: Can QUIC packets become larger than 64K? (#611)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Transport: Can QUIC packets become larger than 64K? (#611)
Martin Thomson
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5jUJpjD_x9z7BnTElG8A4U5e7wk/
2402371
1708298
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)
MikkelFJ
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i5HJOXo8hlVlWiaXQZsKRSL-b04/
2402364
1705318
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)
MikkelFJ
2017-06-09
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/CfmOrwVscI5qZZesC1q4zBl3qvA/
2402361
1705318
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)
martinduke
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PCAykY6sGJSlYBH3kgfcgwlpTQc/
2402253
1705318
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)
ianswett
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Om8GMX2LYndKjL4NubSu6JFJQqE/
2402250
1708290
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reconsider the use of FNV-1a for "cleartext" integrity (#554)
ianswett
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_DRDYiUeWaHLh0-WY9wgdVe1Pqw/
2402241
1705318
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_PROMISE ordering guarantee (#557)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_PROMISE ordering guarantee (#557)
Kazuho Oku
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1_8tyTMRT0XBlFQ_xL_trjJ11lE/
2402180
1705826
[quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)[quicwg/base-drafts] quic-tls is the wrong doc to talk about integrity check for unprotected packets (#617)
Lars Eggert
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ymbNEShJrnAtV2Mui3Bi2Rfzlhs/
2402170
1708415
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_PROMISE ordering guarantee (#557)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_PROMISE ordering guarantee (#557)
Mike Bishop
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/_VT5K3driVYzibP612fLIDC9TpY/
2402149
1705826
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_PROMISE ordering guarantee (#557)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] PUSH_PROMISE ordering guarantee (#557)
Kazuho Oku
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/LZyzrD5Gqh9YuDgUHmmLvRYgFrY/
2402127
1705826
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Latency Spin Bit (#609)
MikkelFJ
2017-06-08
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rpON2aZa4yf7A1c9SiHtZXwbKk0/
2402070
1708290