Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A zero-length Retry Token is invalid (#3277)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A zero-length Retry Token is invalid (#3277)
Marten Seemann
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yC39QrZ_SjG7zIKRyG-Zc9sRDcs/
2810936
1869115
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove handshake confirmed test for KeyUpdate (#3212)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove handshake confirmed test for KeyUpdate (#3212)
Martin Thomson
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/lUEoQjdtiKnMy7lgChjVRlSMj-A/
2810934
1866554
[quicwg/base-drafts] 258e3b: Script updating issues at 2019-11-28T01:08:20Z. [c...[quicwg/base-drafts] 258e3b: Script updating issues at 2019-11-28T01:08:20Z. [c...
Martin Thomson
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/h934tJcr7sdpo3GlSZ0ZSSdK8hc/
2810932
1869117
[quicwg/base-drafts] 7e58db: Script updating gh-pages from c43acac9. [ci skip][quicwg/base-drafts] 7e58db: Script updating gh-pages from c43acac9. [ci skip]
Martin Thomson
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/uMHoAPo6el8yow0mz3afwtP68vQ/
2810931
1869116
[quicwg/base-drafts] A zero-length Retry Token is invalid (#3277)[quicwg/base-drafts] A zero-length Retry Token is invalid (#3277)
Martin Thomson
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/QB6teUoA2re7znDfSa2nHNXV_2Q/
2810929
1869115
[quicwg/base-drafts] c43aca: A zero-length Retry Token is invalid[quicwg/base-drafts] c43aca: A zero-length Retry Token is invalid
Martin Thomson
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/NBKIm-MWCinGU6to4Ay6Q4yeKFw/
2810928
1869114
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] enforce the active_connection_id_limit (#3201)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] enforce the active_connection_id_limit (#3201)
Martin Thomson
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/yLPRBLcpApyxQlV6cqeYm19R6tM/
2810927
1866274
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Kazuho Oku
2019-11-28
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/op4q-uEQnN67Gz0T6cZo6Gv7Hjo/
2810915
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)
Martin Thomson
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/S8k5tzPr9atYXTE7_brGU-H6IpM/
2810906
1868992
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/FH2L6lNZIlmaqany9pvyghrIzhI/
2810897
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Martin Thomson
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/I3Gwq-17qGrjA7tf5B3rVpsxRVw/
2810888
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0sOfkvFAPlhdKzH_l86O0XwCuEg/
2810868
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Fg4sLHjJBb5oOFPQBCiK49v-Wis/
2810867
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (#3276)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (#3276)
Kazuho Oku
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/i5TIPp5neax7JtCGIsRUY3iYJX8/
2810866
1869012
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Kazuho Oku
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1wrbhSZurWwtX49-VOf-HVoaiFA/
2810863
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/342B8AFucWh8tZcv2O26JyBU6nw/
2810862
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DbN967TFxmN6h_nSdabGy11dwOo/
2810852
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/nvLUUlolsXaq7HUN5B9c1_6H9_4/
2810847
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Kazuho Oku
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/oZ-_QWIIfHdrHu30HXShpENl7Tc/
2810842
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/QQeuegl6vy-1uU16xt0dlkeI9Qk/
2810840
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/BHgB5EagifbdKxUu7JqJOE56LsQ/
2810837
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/EvG1BBGDPw8EJlqpIP-g7zngYwc/
2810835
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 references QUIC Stream IDs directly, allowing illegal references (#3273)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 references QUIC Stream IDs directly, allowing illegal references (#3273)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/2pXxNd1KcfqTqKTC1wv-4OIz5eM/
2810738
1868694
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 references QUIC Stream IDs directly, allowing illegal references (#3273)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 references QUIC Stream IDs directly, allowing illegal references (#3273)
Ryan Hamilton
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/1oBvWEYd9mNSGZo8Fn1Durwt-EI/
2810719
1868694
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/oM465hp0fZ3olewR067GikXBTlc/
2810714
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/pTkFadUQ3_ugBPB_UqmElz3odLM/
2810709
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (#3276)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (#3276)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/-nVMEWxAIdIjKTLxAqJoIqPLtoQ/
2810702
1869012
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP: Tweak wording about unknown error codes (#3239)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP: Tweak wording about unknown error codes (#3239)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/0iJvjFEjwsFohoTL03GrCSVWL_Q/
2810698
1867132
[quicwg/base-drafts] Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (#3276)[quicwg/base-drafts] Ambiguous wording about error codes in HTTP/3 (#3276)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/5QQex_Hu-cS6SzQLhyaxnv6FvBc/
2810697
1869012
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP: Tweak wording about unknown error codes (#3239)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP: Tweak wording about unknown error codes (#3239)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/75e1VXWt6X8eqRsHhpsnV_4257w/
2810692
1867132
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Dmitri Tikhonov
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Eggx1k4LaFIjcHAtIbgvNoeLudc/
2810689
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)
mirjak
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/PX6WCb-fHcKCkdUofN4rwFJ_SNU/
2810673
1867220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Aa9CaLOflYzXMGDie_YXqs10SPM/
2810667
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Kazuho Oku
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/zTz3hYIg1KuIdxjEia7Pj6j56pI/
2810656
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Lucas Pardue
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Qbnf_zZGNyGOt9S_DVayLj5VUa4/
2810653
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Kazuho Oku
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/Ab3qE4JtPpbMOwcqEnJAm-C0qMc/
2810652
1869004
[quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)[quicwg/base-drafts] Why are there two ways of associating push with requests? (#3275)
Kazuho Oku
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/TbaARbDX3Pa-AFbVVqj6V0k22l4/
2810650
1869004
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)
Martin Thomson
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/DNrHog962ZEfjG4iEXJdpCbnV2M/
2810618
1867220
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Fix congestion control permissiveness (#3248)
Gorry Fairhurst
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/rKF5fysVqE9OOp0LYdYR5F8kQIY/
2810615
1867220
[quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)[quicwg/base-drafts] Encrypting Retry token (#3274)
Martin Thomson
2019-11-27
quic-issues
/arch/msg/quic-issues/ItjF1iOZI3WsW3hIDaMQ5EjGnS8/
2810610
1868992