Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Andrew G. Malis
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/XriaOgA1z54hP9eY51OFNNcOCiA/
2832710
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?Re: [rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Julian Reschke
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/tIiGyLfvbebsijAykNApMEWoL8c/
2832709
1877154
[rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?[rfc-i] Should RFC-7996-bis be an IETF document in an IETF WG?
Doug Royer
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/XeIVMYxk7OfmewbEUHI49roGWo8/
2832708
1877154
Re: [rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996Re: [rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996
Julian Reschke
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3pDBZKz0CSeM75o1GyjJL2JUmSE/
2832707
1877153
[rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996[rfc-i] ARIA and SVG and RFC 7996
Cullen Jennings
2020-01-28
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/uSQk_YuCRx9iQlNXgc5uV0Bdpp8/
2832706
1877153
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-25
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/2DV7TIufkGy7yNMEaUBu4v0Z9Y8/
2832705
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Julian Reschke
2020-01-25
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/-nx4j_X1NK8ZPp3RowDS53cUVgE/
2832704
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/2Z96BEUq8-7b-S71i0slis9Xc4k/
2832703
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/NhwjOnXPt6X62ilh28Xh0oNS1Cs/
2832702
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Leonard Rosenthol
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/jDKAxujqMfJkQc1A0HvRxRQX5JI/
2832701
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/Pmj5iRB4Hf9tnZszCKgpBI1ramI/
2832700
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.Re: [rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Leonard Rosenthol
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/VAXQiQjVrzW2909vG1KpkGnx0aM/
2832699
1877152
[rfc-i] SVG/A specification.[rfc-i] SVG/A specification.
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-24
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/bAupEDZffSp7semFwGNO6alI2tY/
2832698
1877152
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-23
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/pIge5DpaQSuk5D2T2Yq7SWL6PIM/
2832697
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-23
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/xuD6RlG9Kw0Ai4StOcNwKVdDypc/
2832696
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-23
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/jiDXM_2oxGW11f7ay1796oCOCeQ/
2832695
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Donald Eastlake
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/DxdOxpKKDkPi9b1__10xNoPxIMk/
2832694
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
S Moonesamy
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/8PSq-2X7MyBp07G9Dh8kJBIuw_M/
2832693
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-TinyRe: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/8i7m7eNyFZvokASUTQM9et9AU2E/
2832692
1875038
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/d_atyUXCdw0DYbxVTBApE7N08Yg/
2832691
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/zdymlgbd6N3fbZxXvdoGyruMn3I/
2832690
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Salz, Rich
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/IyuL5Ot4GQiI4AJdMKFhit9gMBo/
2832689
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Julian Reschke
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/Zbhoq7orNfpRADs6tAcyYeJQbzQ/
2832688
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3oqBAckjOCFCb2KL1iLyLpWnFpk/
2832687
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Christian Huitema
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/KBIAIxksuGR_sYmWSKN_ONYwpy4/
2832686
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Carsten Bormann
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/k_th9J9We1MFSyo190Ztojv8_ys/
2832685
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-TinyRe: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
Julian Reschke
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/3amxghfQw8Ve0NTY8vOekxvmKfI/
2832684
1875038
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Julian Reschke
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/GxGUTZ75NDChPVdx3oyWLJEYkv4/
2832683
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/cv4fJOMIIrhttHngomxaPBRS3S0/
2832682
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-TinyRe: [rfc-i] The problem is SVG-Tiny
Michael Richardson
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/c7xFWmmFcBpdPHnb27YLDETwNDU/
2832681
1875038
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Mark Nottingham
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/dpy8xF-tLhAVgUfnk2Z0XhtjL40/
2832680
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/GQO64shjxnl5nt4qF-TKWz68foE/
2832679
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/BBRMTRtXcaaBwRmIWLRsqksdnxs/
2832678
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Brian E Carpenter
2020-01-22
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/eNM_20X32T74rueluhYs2eM8LK8/
2832677
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivialRe: [rfc-i] No, constraining to a custom SVG profile is not trivial
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-21
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/UnXkWwsHGOOLED480KythHD6Vdo/
2832675
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Minor v3 questionRe: [rfc-i] Minor v3 question
Joel Halpern Direct
2020-01-21
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/kh5buovDNGL-qtzAwgpbNZB8xiw/
2832676
1875067
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2020-01-21
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/J23guGKys_J40LFxBlyHixEyYyY/
2832674
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Minor v3 questionRe: [rfc-i] Minor v3 question
Carsten Bormann
2020-01-21
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/_g2bvuGPV6UtscZVi0lfB6DXeeU/
2832673
1875067
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Carsten Bormann
2020-01-21
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/0IxLS1SfGNxIF2wSxXhN0-FlaJo/
2832672
1874276
Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?Re: [rfc-i] Where was the discussion?
Julian Reschke
2020-01-21
rfc-interest
/arch/msg/rfc-interest/JotGpan8GRwGRPAHICiZ3-GCHlQ/
2832671
1874276