Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Paul Kyzivat
2011-09-08
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/ZUjf6zgOPytZtQnkmB9jVLltH3I/
1248831
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Paul Kyzivat
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/EwPGkH071wrKPvWmkcii8plt-jI/
1248830
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Dzonatas Sol
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/yHBHe1iEnjIBqaNi6YuGKEEsVxQ/
1248829
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Randell Jesup
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/UgFHq7_8AbAcoe_l7sBJt1r28rs/
1248828
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/9XPsGogE3PDGDIrZjUV8nTSEfOc/
1248827
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate (and offer/answer)Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate (and offer/answer)
Randell Jesup
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/SRX4Uw06MjlNWJyJxDKPKQyhZuk/
1248826
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/2ipd3RcxPJy_RPXoQheSuWdcJhA/
1248825
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/zwKGRG6qtCYASMpoqOgesQOSgjo/
1248824
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Support for websocketsRe: [rtcweb] Support for websockets
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/ywocgXUx2A-fFctqvjDiiUNIX8A/
1248823
1586031
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/s6jijarwMXLyyw1nEUFC0wT_MWw/
1248822
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/NnDcmzg_D6CjSmHK1tIw6RuOQwU/
1248821
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Wci3eemg7CegdY5NP-N-djeoCEg/
1248820
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Randell Jesup
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/x9OLJlXYeF7aQClZvO83dqaxriE/
1248819
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Igor Faynberg
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/R3PofCTQvVZ_xLCDMmueM4fBQ64/
1248818
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Dzonatas Sol
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/zVWOgGHRiF7z47_yG5-htNnLuiA/
1248817
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Igor Faynberg
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/z2xVQOazLZVhbCeqspEwZXWA6Kw/
1248816
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Christopher Blizzard
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Hyx29z3ZiVf0fVHsFye95ghZYvE/
1248815
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate (and offer/answer)Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate (and offer/answer)
Jonathan Lennox
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/ZKuPXRhbkkjEbigwAK-MiX_nJ6g/
1248814
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Dzonatas Sol
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/M6ISiuxeNyRxEphVo0nW4a8pCL8/
1248813
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Olle E. Johansson
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/n4edCrq_PzALaCn0hO9I29yBpaE/
1248812
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semanticsRe: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semantics
Henry Sinnreich
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/G8hNqQfKBYQ_P2bU2Q_tvPSn7AQ/
1248811
1585971
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Olle E. Johansson
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/UsLLNRxam1czbawT5plQLhBldlI/
1248810
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Dzonatas Sol
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/9d5PyJdyMqqnXGQsysKaNNdMiz8/
1248809
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Encryption mandateRe: [rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Olle E. Johansson
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/hyeuj69pGPvzvNy2cd99jr8XLlo/
1248808
1585992
[rtcweb] Encryption mandate[rtcweb] Encryption mandate
Randell Jesup
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/J1gezqPCeNUy5BTp2VDEl2BB-00/
1248807
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Randell Jesup
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/7e1bCcXYCdBZy6HVr19skgFbzHc/
1248806
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Mary Barnes
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/uFfsf-8YROcgMQf1eAIgUWjec2U/
1248805
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Markus.Isomaki
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/mHUjnp44pWmi2gBK2O3gTJAe_W8/
1248804
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/7U7Ryf-1SHNACi-tlGWjj-45yrI/
1248803
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Ravindran Parthasarathi
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/cPVdgZmPwj19OtIWi-5qKszCg9Y/
1248802
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Igor Faynberg
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/wbB5lDSzRCur423Tuq4aObkdcHY/
1248801
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Igor Faynberg
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/mqpiqKj21aG-P0623Rv5Yq5pM7o/
1248800
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Roman Shpount
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Wbfj4lYHJNpl55q7F_blvHTKsZ4/
1248799
1585992
[rtcweb] New security draft[rtcweb] New security draft
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/N7hta-ToieJO1zfjjg3e070ra1U/
1248798
1585968
[rtcweb] Updated Agenda, meeting materials[rtcweb] Updated Agenda, meeting materials
Ted Hardie
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/rolsyjx3HesjHbW_omMN1D2Vc5Q/
1248797
1585969
Re: [rtcweb] Support for websocketsRe: [rtcweb] Support for websockets
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/FsN4YM9yuKiiH2yPuNT2ZZtF3Ng/
1248796
1586031
[rtcweb] WebEX details for tomorrows RTCWeb call[rtcweb] WebEX details for tomorrows RTCWeb call
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/dg7Sn9Evzdhv6vBVJ2AYMrmp6Lc/
1248795
1585970
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Paul Kyzivat
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/mIlgedPHT--uAQvshaZqsP9XI8o/
1248794
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Tim Panton
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/lMCEhsJfSqPPNXpYq1i4a4PHv9s/
1248793
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Support for websocketsRe: [rtcweb] Support for websockets
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/saooKq9fZPHsqpu8pHoR14BP7eo/
1248792
1586031
17897 Messages