Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-26
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/cV23eZsI1eqFGi_Pa0HfoB2XHKA/
1249463
1585955
Re: [rtcweb] Security and browser/screen accessRe: [rtcweb] Security and browser/screen access
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-26
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/M8gYkNuLBe1RgXIh5OV3Yn8el7w/
1249462
1585942
Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-26
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/z97U6yKsNbLaxonc5aF4KqY9Zr8/
1249461
1585955
Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])
Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
2011-09-26
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/CTL7qFLSK2ShtGboB8fYXBkgRGI/
1249460
1585955
[rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-05 addition around IPv6 only and dualstack[rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-05 addition around IPv6 only and dualstack
Magnus Westerlund
2011-09-26
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/UKuxFRnwSnoEoV2XJ8YjpJEDmPM/
1249459
1585940
Re: [rtcweb] SIP Glare - Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] SIP Glare - Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Randell Jesup
2011-09-26
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/yUZGY20kLB_YKOq2Og4BHaae8lE/
1249458
1585947
[rtcweb] RTCWEB and emergency services[rtcweb] RTCWEB and emergency services
Bernard Aboba
2011-09-26
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/7SUulKsZC3ZjoGdnMARwu2wmSnA/
1249457
1585941
Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NATRe: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
Roman Shpount
2011-09-25
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/kFa-AOkbW53qLuRVrz4P6kgV6vM/
1249456
1585943
[rtcweb] Security and browser/screen access[rtcweb] Security and browser/screen access
Randell Jesup
2011-09-25
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/L2wyIli2O5osiBr26hZUiSKtGMw/
1249455
1585942
Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NATRe: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
Cameron Byrne
2011-09-25
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/wSuZTNqFYy_9TaRpYaKBNa8uuB8/
1249454
1585943
Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NATRe: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
Roman Shpount
2011-09-25
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/JMWDxcw2A8_USIuBJqPDJdxojNs/
1249453
1585943
Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NATRe: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-25
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/uyMnDyuxh2SBZN6fau79ganVeRo/
1249452
1585943
Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NATRe: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/24D3JBNp1Lggj_YAjL1kwMv36IU/
1249451
1585943
Re: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NATRe: [rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
Alfred E. Heggestad
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/_yxutR8WaXbtVjb5Lo5qKzqjRy0/
1249450
1585943
[rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT[rtcweb] ICE does not work if both peers are behind symmetric NAT
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/LxOSZCa8tZ-vLiTeC54fAWCeoT8/
1249449
1585943
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/okMVxhJEZVebhjgLvbaTzAid9jQ/
1249448
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/_VShSbiXM0ahr1um5DwUETWxghg/
1249447
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/-wb-i1p7vmW1JHn9ivTx0P_wL6c/
1249446
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/h320a3fHiaeb_T0eD3PNsQuZIZU/
1249445
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/5b3KGRNJhTSHiENzGQG_b7EQT84/
1249444
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Ay9BoRR04VmVnq2izk3Qz-34Gqg/
1249443
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/_d7_SQh0UruZWeHOLXcSH6wQ_cY/
1249442
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applicationsRe: [rtcweb] STUN for keep-alive - RTCP-less applications
Olle E. Johansson
2011-09-24
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/P65xXaonWqPmw6qs4IRAcYR9uOc/
1249441
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] Another approach to forking...Re: [rtcweb] Another approach to forking...
Randell Jesup
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/bgZQEOAmrteNJxALclbGGq0elXI/
1249440
1585944
Re: [rtcweb] Another approach to forking...Re: [rtcweb] Another approach to forking...
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/xmNVS3hIZCapjLudwRpaRcoQl74/
1249439
1585944
Re: [rtcweb] Another approach to forking...Re: [rtcweb] Another approach to forking...
Hadriel Kaplan
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/l9qeWS155izv3TKBwLINc1TBWeo/
1249438
1585944
[rtcweb] Another approach to forking...[rtcweb] Another approach to forking...
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/_PPeJjfgPnG1YuSQ78BFemAP5Tw/
1249437
1585944
Re: [rtcweb] consent freshness [was RE: STUN for keep-alive]Re: [rtcweb] consent freshness [was RE: STUN for keep-alive]
Stefan Håkansson LK
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/KuqQPD3FdYKBjRvCmzTOYFlYilA/
1249436
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Christer Holmberg
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Pyv1fSd3TUppkV6z3L-mC1eRwtc/
1249435
1585947
Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/X3Xn1Tk1g3OvAJR6QCTlqPQ0iTY/
1249434
1585947
Re: [rtcweb] consent freshness [was RE: STUN for keep-alive]Re: [rtcweb] consent freshness [was RE: STUN for keep-alive]
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/qxbnIgOmXgVjB11wDZoDwFaDpqs/
1249433
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] consent freshness [was RE: STUN for keep-alive]Re: [rtcweb] consent freshness [was RE: STUN for keep-alive]
Magnus Westerlund
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/MyuKEB6bUE-sedv6hrZG0KgUNb0/
1249432
1585957
Re: [rtcweb] SIP Glare - Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] SIP Glare - Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Magnus Westerlund
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/fNsnH-A3vYfehP3MZ60es8WCnNw/
1249431
1585947
Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Hadriel Kaplan
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/HKpQIlW0_3tVhNVPdUI1FyTGESc/
1249430
1585947
Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Christer Holmberg
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/wQIBZOct0PNI9yCXtfe2wGEnkDM/
1249429
1585947
Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Christer Holmberg
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/GITAGarUvidfWTCUiGzpj_RKq84/
1249428
1585947
Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])
Roman Shpount
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/LGWAdVv0FZsZevIjroiYPNskm24/
1249427
1585955
Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])Re: [rtcweb] "20 lines" (Re: RTCWeb default signaling protocol [was RE: About defining a signaling protocol for WebRTC (or not)])
Jozsef Vass
2011-09-23
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/zRBH6o1icHs5dDgiCyeDpf9AkDs/
1249426
1585955
Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Roman Shpount
2011-09-22
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/oxYF253iXA9Dqq9iy0H7WVjogTs/
1249425
1585947
Re: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanismRe: [rtcweb] Forking & Early Media - Was Re: Minimal SDP negotiation mechanism
Hadriel Kaplan
2011-09-22
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/w6iIg2JrlWjkN1L6UI4I-1ek4_A/
1249424
1585947
17897 Messages