Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Markus.Isomaki
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/mHUjnp44pWmi2gBK2O3gTJAe_W8/
1248804
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/7U7Ryf-1SHNACi-tlGWjj-45yrI/
1248803
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Ravindran Parthasarathi
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/cPVdgZmPwj19OtIWi-5qKszCg9Y/
1248802
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Igor Faynberg
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/wbB5lDSzRCur423Tuq4aObkdcHY/
1248801
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Igor Faynberg
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/mqpiqKj21aG-P0623Rv5Yq5pM7o/
1248800
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Roman Shpount
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Wbfj4lYHJNpl55q7F_blvHTKsZ4/
1248799
1585992
[rtcweb] New security draft[rtcweb] New security draft
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/N7hta-ToieJO1zfjjg3e070ra1U/
1248798
1585968
[rtcweb] Updated Agenda, meeting materials[rtcweb] Updated Agenda, meeting materials
Ted Hardie
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/rolsyjx3HesjHbW_omMN1D2Vc5Q/
1248797
1585969
Re: [rtcweb] Support for websocketsRe: [rtcweb] Support for websockets
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/FsN4YM9yuKiiH2yPuNT2ZZtF3Ng/
1248796
1586031
[rtcweb] WebEX details for tomorrows RTCWeb call[rtcweb] WebEX details for tomorrows RTCWeb call
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/dg7Sn9Evzdhv6vBVJ2AYMrmp6Lc/
1248795
1585970
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Paul Kyzivat
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/mIlgedPHT--uAQvshaZqsP9XI8o/
1248794
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Tim Panton
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/lMCEhsJfSqPPNXpYq1i4a4PHv9s/
1248793
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Support for websocketsRe: [rtcweb] Support for websockets
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/saooKq9fZPHsqpu8pHoR14BP7eo/
1248792
1586031
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/KZNXTqjQCQM8YxCOHp1eE-T8ApQ/
1248791
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/4gxfDl1w_wuWSmG3cK-k7Txf0RA/
1248790
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/wA0Ki-clBy8npC4WUGTEBYdeDas/
1248789
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/P-SdSjNi4AasPOS0GZHE-dKcCsk/
1248788
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semanticsRe: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semantics
Emil Ivov
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Avk5srDysEROf5s0yVPNCtPsRG0/
1248787
1585971
Re: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semanticsRe: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semantics
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/sVTIKy6nIIz30Vq1n001D1-LLv0/
1248786
1585971
[rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)[rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/uBoT-CPJxv-RC2iaccHNo32CFhA/
1248785
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] An input for discussing congestion control (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-congestion-00.txt)Re: [rtcweb] An input for discussing congestion control (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-congestion-00.txt)
Harald Alvestrand
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/QfRSFWkCYQNJ1tJuLDGYHXJWok0/
1248784
1585972
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Olle E. Johansson
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/ZX_76TTX3KHMMUQMmVuVqPbm-Jw/
1248783
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semanticsRe: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semantics
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/qspeC-mYwF03lKlmlGDeB4yejAM/
1248782
1585971
Re: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semanticsRe: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semantics
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Jhbcmu2lL773wxc-4bou1v1qvCo/
1248781
1585971
Re: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semanticsRe: [rtcweb] Use of offer / answer semantics
Cullen Jennings
2011-09-07
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/6EKie_dp7AP5WWTE60_1Y5diiQ4/
1248780
1585971
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Paul Kyzivat
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/mQz8yOP7dWSmQ5UkmaNibXfUZoc/
1248779
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] An input for discussing congestion control (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-congestion-00.txt)Re: [rtcweb] An input for discussing congestion control (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-congestion-00.txt)
Randell Jesup
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/g1h-4FxfA74_JUw5_8trszYwkV4/
1248778
1585972
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/8ZM7lEHprtV2eMv_x9rJut759u0/
1248777
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/S_O3ivFlBmdfL3LBf6RKAxcdYCI/
1248776
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/_2LV90B9Mb9UybrNDxHlxk8LhDY/
1248775
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/PxSvD75Cgdeozm-mSpjMduLlhF0/
1248774
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Justin Uberti
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/0R2foQijvtyZecWUrdMHGDMiOrc/
1248773
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Igor Faynberg
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/SUAa8UJaYaEvMgJUw5da7kJuu20/
1248772
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remoterecording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recordingclient]
Asveren, Tolga
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Cesie2R_Q_4lmkY22RScOIgEd2s/
1248771
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserverRe: [rtcweb] Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver
Ravindran Parthasarathi
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Cldx0HV6WIV8FdDdwEahNqXWspI/
1248770
1585996
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Ravindran Parthasarathi
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/uHsdzDzMEC89iS0PnPoKqHu_HKc/
1248769
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Olle E. Johansson
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/Xw_HPPKBRLRd4V6OKGLyicXlTN4/
1248768
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/2Xht_76aFD-d_DA059rzTlltVvM/
1248767
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]Re: [rtcweb] SIP MUST NOT be used in browser?[was RE: Remote recording - RTC-Web client acting as SIPREC session recording client]
Ravindran Parthasarathi
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/QdINmA3l7TpmMNDUlLwy8wFF2os/
1248766
1585992
Re: [rtcweb] Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserverRe: [rtcweb] Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver
Matthew Kaufman
2011-09-06
rtcweb
/arch/msg/rtcweb/dA5GOg-UdlbmMMvn-RXbP50LaEI/
1248765
1585996
17897 Messages