Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking toolRe: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
Frank Bulk
2020-02-28
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/aRziRGL3OPMQzmM9tkpymKNR7W4/
2841809
1880247
Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking toolRe: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
Frank Bulk
2020-02-28
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/0U1yxEfGzlsBrytacCtyg4SdS3g/
2841808
1880247
Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking toolRe: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
Stuart D Gathman
2020-02-27
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/_b3Pg4veLxtsRIpU2UWxJ186asQ/
2841343
1880247
Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking toolRe: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
Frank Bulk
2020-02-27
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/5_AqnD40TMBFvHgHTGmfCkeTvvU/
2841177
1880247
Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking toolRe: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
Stuart D Gathman
2020-02-27
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/WbehPXeqCeZkHhTR09tDW7hijNo/
2840938
1880247
Re: [spfbis] SPF-checking toolRe: [spfbis] SPF-checking tool
Scott Kitterman
2020-02-26
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/j994AbgOEdjEkf2nWWbhcdexvfc/
2840694
1880247
[spfbis] SPF-checking tool[spfbis] SPF-checking tool
Frank Bulk
2020-02-26
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/cN6F7-kNLkGShCkW5uy8U2wuxIg/
2840337
1880247
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5843)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5843)
Scott Kitterman
2019-08-22
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/LmrgIeYSov-FxUYHPDbe9O4viPQ/
2771544
1854868
[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5843)[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5843)
RFC Errata System
2019-08-22
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/Yqd7p3gJ3eOOldXhNlbD1PvgT5o/
2771532
1854868
Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Brandon Long
2019-03-09
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/9gloArh2juj0WXJHBqon5_J8mk0/
2703043
1828448
Re: [spfbis] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Alessandro Vesely
2019-02-25
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/9hKZxpsEXTdhc8YXl4AV4uZ52Q8/
2697418
1828448
Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Hector Santos
2019-02-24
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/oZB5cBWyBeLMqCX65bG4VVNucD0/
2697178
1828448
Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Dotzero
2019-02-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/4DNQbjoNkWnxKV3Tf4JwENOQdlE/
2697020
1828448
Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-02-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/ngjYrc2fd_ZEkW-HQRpD4b3DUko/
2697011
1828448
Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Vladimir Dubrovin
2019-02-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/0LgAnYMthKN4EvYvoZVAd3Xa8HA/
2697005
1828448
Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Hector Santos
2019-02-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/R7fILwS2Tku-HDWwqOs989DOLpU/
2696999
1828448
Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?Re: [spfbis] [dmarc-ietf] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Tim Wicinski
2019-02-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/-c1reg8TMm8_8hA7bExrrS13zTU/
2696993
1828448
[spfbis] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?[spfbis] Should we encourage the use of SPF "soft include" for common platforms?
Kurt Andersen (b)
2019-02-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/KyuFALpk3O1Dadr-JVZUo11nsVk/
2696987
1828448
[spfbis] [Errata Verified] RFC7208 (5436)[spfbis] [Errata Verified] RFC7208 (5436)
RFC Errata System
2018-11-26
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/muKMi_4zQXsjfyjsyaAxvPmjpC8/
2664544
1817000
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)
Scott Kitterman
2018-11-12
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/LKleDB5d9x0etUzKXnPuxs1fGNQ/
2659300
1815014
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5436)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5436)
Scott Kitterman
2018-11-12
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/YVv1abQPo-V5mJhAywGXGYcjsrI/
2659299
1797609
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)
Stuart D. Gathman
2018-11-09
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/6vurBaf0Rk4lNTyrH5I6-NsUT7U/
2658507
1815014
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)
Scott Kitterman
2018-11-09
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/sRWqnpaeVJSO5ITCF5-sI8cdNiA/
2658501
1815014
[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5550)
RFC Errata System
2018-11-09
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/_LV75SuQnGqEnJCeHaocT_Rv9vY/
2658461
1815014
Re: [spfbis] Most common mail header fields seen with nonsyntactic valuesRe: [spfbis] Most common mail header fields seen with nonsyntactic values
Peter Occil
2018-07-25
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/0j5HdOIptom2Saa5QyehH19FZjg/
2614878
1797880
[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5436)[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5436)
RFC Errata System
2018-07-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/dZx6YXuPKPdtTh1yR6mavc75tn0/
2614213
1797609
Re: [spfbis] Question regarding RFC 7208Re: [spfbis] Question regarding RFC 7208
John Levine
2018-07-22
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/l8WgQ6qaYA5EdPA4WYZM67IQwxg/
2613956
1797502
[spfbis] Question regarding RFC 7208[spfbis] Question regarding RFC 7208
Peter Occil
2018-07-22
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/BYrDQ45HgFf6lJ-lpRqpVDRQM_U/
2613951
1797502
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5228)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5228)
S Moonesamy
2018-02-01
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/V1kKMherURNE4bspmRc_gUNM7Qk/
2536767
1762928
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5227)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5227)
S Moonesamy
2018-02-01
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/Zq-1ohV33TBq0O4L0kvAbKaVTcI/
2536766
1762926
[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5228)[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5228)
RFC Errata System
2018-01-04
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/CalpIW2HYvOjlVxApvSPHrvDndQ/
2525922
1762928
[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5227)[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (5227)
RFC Errata System
2018-01-04
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/MKfTFmK0Lsp_w_dWIxbfsD41KyQ/
2525918
1762926
Re: [spfbis] Proposed spf TXT record changeRe: [spfbis] Proposed spf TXT record change
Frank Ellermann
2017-10-21
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/RyK490bqbYtnPd1D2XQPuF3X1Js/
2497406
1631673
Re: [spfbis] How's it goingRe: [spfbis] How's it going
bensons
2017-03-11
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/XRW3Wz9FlNdnhRtaoxC34ALQhSs/
2341436
1690873
Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4751)Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4751)
S Moonesamy
2016-10-31
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/tk0MUaoLl7DTyAiZiDNlDatGEQQ/
2290476
1631669
Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841)Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841)
S Moonesamy
2016-10-31
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/Ro-rpXLU8LQz-tRHQaV3OXYkN9o/
2290408
1631668
[spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841)[spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841)
RFC Errata System
2016-10-25
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/VPCu7oy6M14koZHr-nnXpuehyD4/
2288050
1631668
[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4751)[spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4751)
RFC Errata System
2016-07-27
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/mnQBZ3ZW7YFlKhaIudtNsf9kadY/
2243146
1631669
Re: [spfbis] Question about SPF checks based on RFC 7208Re: [spfbis] Question about SPF checks based on RFC 7208
S Moonesamy
2016-06-24
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/U_90JMUlwTgGyqMrtZbfw0bjBAE/
2227594
1631672
Re: [spfbis] Question about SPF checks based on RFC 7208Re: [spfbis] Question about SPF checks based on RFC 7208
Frank Bulk
2016-06-23
spfbis
/arch/msg/spfbis/rxFlqHSyW-NQHyxVMj5wR7qN4nM/
2227066
1631672
4453 Messages