ietf Discussion Archive - Date Index - Sep 2004

ietf Discussion Archive - Date Index - Sep 2004

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]

Sep 30 2004

Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Iljitsch van Beijnum
RE: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson
Re: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Randy Presuhn
RE: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Thomas Gal
RE: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Joe Shen
Submitted comments from the poll about restructuring options, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Poll results (raw), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
(no subject), deva
Re: Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), Dave Crocker
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Leif Johansson
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where, Gene Gaines
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker
Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Paul Vixie
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Leif Johansson
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker
Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Richard Shockey
[tcpsat] test - please ignore, Aaron Falk

Sep 29 2004

Re: Boilerplates and xml2rfc, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where, Kai Henningsen
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance, Kai Henningsen
Re: Root Anycast (fwd), Dean Anderson
Re: Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Doo Timbir
Re: Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Doo Timbir
Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Jeffrey Hutzelman

Sep 28 2004

Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Joe Touch
Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Joe Touch
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, avri
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Bill Manning
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, ned.freed
Re: NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Lars Eggert
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker
NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers, Danny McPherson
Boilerplates and xml2rfc, Tim Chown
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Eliot Lear
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Margaret Wasserman
Reminding chairs about boilerplate, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Eliot Lear
Re: Thoughts on scenario O, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, John C Klensin
Thoughts on scenario O, Adrian Farrel
RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Sep 27 2004

Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Dave Crocker
RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie
My opinion on administrative restructuring: Scenario O, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)
RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Tony Hain
Re: Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), David Lloyd-Jones
RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie
RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Tony Hain
RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie
RE: Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Tony Hain
Reminder: Poll about restructuring options, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (beha ve) (fwd), Eric Burger
Re: Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), John Loughney
Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley
Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Jeroen Massar
Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Re: a note about the scenarios, Tim Chown
Re: Last Call: 'Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs' to Proposed Standard, Francis Dupont
Level of consultation (Re: a note about the scenarios), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
i wants to leave this mail list, Thank you, taoyuan
I would like to join in the discussion mail list. thanks., zhaisuping

Sep 26 2004

RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Christian de Larrinaga
Re: An Organized Activity of the ISOC [resent], shogunx
An Organized Activity of the ISOC [resent], Kurt D. Zeilenga
Time horizon, contingencies, and destinations (was scenarios 0 and C), Ted Hardie

Sep 25 2004

Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Erik Huizer
Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Scott W Brim
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance, Vernon Schryver
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance, Noel Chiappa
Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Erik Huizer
Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Scott W Brim
ISOC [Re: My views on the Scenario O & C], Brian E Carpenter
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Leif Johansson
Re: a note about the scenarios, Fred Templin
Re: My views on the Scenario O & C, Sam Hartman

Sep 24 2004

Re: a note about the scenarios, Joe Touch
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, scott bradner
Re: a note about the scenarios, John C Klensin
Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, Henrik Levkowetz
My views on the Scenario O & C, Bob Hinden
Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, John C Klensin
Re: future meetings, Marcia Beaulieu
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, Ole Jacobsen
Re: Poll: Restructuring questions, avri
Re: a note about the scenarios, Tim Chown
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?, graham.travers
Poll: Restructuring questions, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Spencer Dawkins
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?, Tony Hain
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Tony Hain
a note about the scenarios, John Loughney
future meetings, Michael Richardson

Sep 23 2004

Scenario C (was: Scenario O), Kai Henningsen
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Kai Henningsen
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Joel M. Halpern
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, scott bradner
Scenario C or Scenario O ?, Sally Floyd
RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Vernon Schryver
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Pekka Savola
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson
Re: Layer Violation (on the reorganization process), John C Klensin
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, scott bradner
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, John C Klensin
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, John C Klensin
Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Margaret Wasserman
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Joel M. Halpern
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Margaret Wasserman
Layer Violation (on the reorganization process), Olaf M. Kolkman
Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Joel M. Halpern
re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, scott bradner
Re: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Margaret Wasserman
Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Alexandru Petrescu
RE: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on w here from here), Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Tony Hain
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Brian E Carpenter

Sep 22 2004

Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Gene Gaines
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Karl Auerbach
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Gene Gaines
Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Sam Hartman
Re: Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Doo Timbir
Re: IETF 62, Ted Faber
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Karl Auerbach
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), John C Klensin
Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), John C Klensin
FYI - US Government requesting information on E-Mail Authentication, Richard Shockey
Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Scenario C prerequisites, scott bradner
Tax excemption (Re: Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Things that I think obvious...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: IETF 62, Michael D Frisch
Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here), John C Klensin
RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62), dee3
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, scott bradner
Re: IETF 62, Scott Michel
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, scott bradner

Sep 21 2004

Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Erik Huizer
NomCom 2004/05 Volunteers: Second Call, Danny McPherson
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Ted Hardie
RE: Things that I think obvious...., Tony Hain
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Margaret Wasserman
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Scott W Brim
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, John C Klensin
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Things that I think obvious...., Fred Baker
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Pekka Savola
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Brian E Carpenter
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Jonathan Rosenberg
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), John C Klensin
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson

Sep 20 2004

Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Melinda Shore
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Bob Hinden
RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62), Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Leslie Daigle
RE: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (beha ve) (fwd), Peterson, Jon
RE: Meeting locations (was IETF 62), Robin Uyeshiro
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Jonathan Rosenberg
AdminRest Scenario C: An IETF Administrative Support Foundation a s an Independent Nonprofit Corporation, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Michael Richardson
Re: IETF 62, Michael Richardson
Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby
Re: IETF 62, jamal
Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby
Re: IETF 62, Tim Chown
Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby
Re: IETF 62, jamal
Re: IETF 62, shogunx
Academics locked out by tight visa controls, Hadmut Danisch
Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here, Leslie Daigle
Re: IETF 62, Melinda Shore
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Mark Allman
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: IETF 62, jamal
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Brian E Carpenter
Re: IETF 62, Lars Eggert
Re: IETF 62, John C Klensin
Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby
Re: IETF 62, Lars Eggert
Re: IETF 62, Martin Stiemerling
Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd), Pekka Savola
Re: IETF 62, Greg Daley
Re: IETF 62, Ben Crosby
Re: IETF 62, Sam Hartman

Sep 18 2004

Re: IETF 62, Lars Eggert

Sep 17 2004

Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Dick St.Peters
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Henrik Levkowetz
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Hadmut Danisch
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), william(at)elan.net
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Tim Chown
Just test, please ignore, Benny Nasution

Sep 16 2004

Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Michael Richardson
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Michael Richardson
Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, avri
Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: help needed about TCP/IP and SNMP, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, Brian E Carpenter
help needed about TCP/IP and SNMP, akshar kanak
Re: Things that I think obvious...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Sep 15 2004

Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, John C Klensin
Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, Carl Malamud
Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, John C Klensin
ISOC board meeting comes AFTER IETF meeting this time, Steve Crocker
Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, John C Klensin
Re: Things that I think obvious...., Margaret Wasserman
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, John C Klensin
Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, Carl Malamud
Re: Things that I think obvious...., Margaret Wasserman
Re: IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), shogunx
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Brian E Carpenter
IETF 62 (was: Re: first steps), Spencer Dawkins
Re: An oversight function - composition thereof?, Brian E Carpenter
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Kai Henningsen
Technical work and the definition of the IETF (Re: Things that I think obvious....), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: I-D submission tool draft, scott bradner
Re: Things that I think obvious...., John C Klensin
Re: IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, Aaron Falk

Sep 14 2004

IETF Administrative Reorganization: What was that problem anyway?, John C Klensin
Re: I-D submission tool draft, Bill Manning
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Vernon Schryver
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Joel Jaeggli
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Scott W Brim
RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Steve Crocker
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Eric Rosen
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Steve Crocker
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)
Re: I-D submission tool draft, James Kempf
Re: Functional differentiation, John C Klensin
Re: I-D submission tool draft, scott bradner
Re: Functional differentiation, Brian E Carpenter
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), graham.travers
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), graham.travers
Re: I-D submission tool draft, Bill Manning
Re: I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz

Sep 13 2004

Re: Functional differentiation, April Marine
Re: There is no proposal on the table for *IETF* incorporation (Was: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Lynn St.Amour
re: I-D submission tool draft, Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Ole Jacobsen
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bob Braden
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Kai Henningsen
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Theodore Ts'o
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Dave Crocker
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Carl Malamud
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), John C Klensin
Re: Functional differentiation, Brian E Carpenter
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Brian E Carpenter
Re: I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz
re: I-D submission tool draft, scott bradner
I-D submission tool draft, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Dave Crocker
Re: What we need done (Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...)), avri
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), John C Klensin
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch

Sep 12 2004

Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Melinda Shore
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch
What we need done (Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...)), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Melinda Shore
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch
RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian Huitema
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Carl Malamud
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch
RE: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Steve Crocker
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), John C Klensin
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Margaret Wasserman
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), scott bradner
Re: first steps (was The other parts of the report...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Kai Henningsen
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch

Sep 11 2004

Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., John C Klensin
first steps (was The other parts of the report...), scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Paul Hoffman / VPNC
RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian Huitema
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Ole Jacobsen
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Spencer Dawkins
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Pekka Savola
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Jeffrey Hutzelman

Sep 10 2004

Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning
Software tools for IETF -- suggestions?, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Carl Malamud
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 26, simon.dux
Looping address on the IETF list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Any interrupt on 'movement' in OPNET?, Atekeh Maghsoudlou
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Joe Touch
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Bill Manning
Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 25, simon.dux
RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian de Larrinaga
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Scott W Brim
Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 24, simon.dux
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Stewart Bryant
Re: Things that I think obvious..., Bernard Aboba
RE: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Christian de Larrinaga
Re: the other parts of the report, Bernard Aboba
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), John C Klensin
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Melinda Shore
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), scott bradner
Autoreply: Ietf Digest, Vol 5, Issue 23, simon.dux
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
Re: admin director (was The other parts of the report..), Scott W Brim
Re: archives (was The other parts of the report...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
admin director (was The other parts of the report..), scott bradner
archives (was The other parts of the report...., scott bradner
An oversight function - composition thereof?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
The other parts of the report...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Where to discuss a draft?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Functional differentiation, scott bradner
Re: Functional differentiation, Ted Hardie

Sep 09 2004

meeting planning, Michael Richardson
Where to discuss a draft?, Luis Oliveira
Re: Functional differentiation, Bernard Aboba
Things that I think obvious...., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
help needed about TCi/IP, akshar kanak
Re: National network harmonization efforts?, Aaron Falk

Sep 08 2004

Re: There is no proposal on the table for *IETF* incorporation (Was: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Margaret Wasserman
There is no proposal on the table for *IETF* incorporation (Was: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Pete Resnick
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Lynn St.Amour
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], Pete Resnick
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], scott bradner
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], Pete Resnick
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, Ted Hardie
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, John C Klensin
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, avri
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, John C Klensin
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], John C Klensin
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, avri
National network harmonization efforts?, Erik Huizer
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, scott bradner
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Brian E Carpenter
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Erik Huizer
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Fred Baker
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
RE: Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, John C Klensin
(no subject), Anjan Biswas
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Fred Baker
Functional differentiation and administrative restructuring, Ted Hardie
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, scott bradner
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Margaret Wasserman
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's, Paul Vixie

Sep 07 2004

RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Steve Crocker
RE: Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Thomas Gal
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Geoff Huston
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Leslie Daigle
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Leslie Daigle
RE: Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Thomas Gal
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Sam Hartman
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Aaron Falk
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Carl Malamud
Please help us revise of Tao of the IETF, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Paul Vixie
request for ICAR reviewers, Mark Allman
RE: Reviewing: draft-malamud-consultant-report-00.txt, Thomas Gal
Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], scott bradner
Reviewing: draft-malamud-consultant-report-00.txt, Graham Klyne
RE: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrativerestructuring], graham.travers
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Sam Hartman
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], scott bradner
Re: Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Pete Resnick
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Margaret Wasserman
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, avri
Sergeants-at-arms for the IETF list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Brian E Carpenter
Explosive bolts [Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Brian E Carpenter
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Pete Resnick
RE: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Thomas Gal

Sep 06 2004

Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, John C Klensin
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, John C Klensin
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Carl Malamud
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, John C Klensin
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, avri
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Margaret Wasserman
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, graham.travers
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Eliot Lear
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Margaret Wasserman
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, graham.travers
Re: On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Brian E Carpenter
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
On the difference between scenarios A and B in Carl's report, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Aaron Falk

Sep 05 2004

RE: help needed about SNMP, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Brian E Carpenter
Re: Legal umbrella etc (Re: What to incorporate), Dean Anderson
help needed about SNMP, akshar kanak

Sep 04 2004

Re: How IETF treats contributors, grenville armitage
Legal umbrella etc (Re: What to incorporate), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Budget numbers (Re: What to incorporate), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Dean Anderson
Re: How IETF treats contributors, ned.freed
Re: How IETF treats contributors, Nathaniel Borenstein
Core Problems/First Principles (was: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Margaret Wasserman
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Steve Crocker

Sep 03 2004

RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
NomCom 2004/05 Call for Volunteers, Danny McPherson
A different cut [was Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring], Leslie Daigle
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), avri
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, scott bradner
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Adrian Farrel
POLL: IETFs Sunday-Friday or Thursday-Tuesday, Henrik Levkowetz
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Henrik Levkowetz

Sep 02 2004

Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), scott bradner
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Dean Anderson
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Michael Richardson
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Leslie Daigle
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Fred Baker
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Susan Harris
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Susan Harris
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Carl Malamud
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Carl Malamud
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Melinda Shore
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC)
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Susan Harris
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Melinda Shore
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, George Michaelson
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Scott Bradner
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Stig Venaas
Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Brian E Carpenter
RE: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Christian de Larrinaga
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, George Michaelson
RE: Friday @ IETF61?, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, George Michaelson
Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Jari Arkko
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Tim Chown
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-josefsson-dns-url-09.txt, Simon Josefsson

Sep 01 2004

Re: Bad mailing list practice?, David Frascone
Bad mailing list practice?, Cyrus Daboo
Re: How IETF treats contributors, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: How IETF treats contributors, william(at)elan.net
RE: Options for IETF administrative restructuring, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Friday @ IETF61?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
isi.edu mailing list memberships reminder, mailman-owner
Re: How IETF treats contributors, Dean Anderson
Re: How IETF treats contributors, Dean Anderson
Re: seems to work now Re: Hotel online reservations, john.loughney
RE: How IETF treats contributors, ned.freed

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]