rtcweb Discussion Archive - Date Index - Oct 2013
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]-
Oct 31 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Richard Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Justin Uberti Oct 30 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Göran Eriksson AP
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jack Moffitt
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Steve Sokol
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Max Jonas Werner
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ethan Hugg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Max Jonas Werner
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Discussion on RMCAT traffic model in Vancouver (03 Nov, 1300-1500), Varun Singh
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Karl Stahl
- [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen)
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] [rmcat] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup Oct 29 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Dave Taht
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] [rmcat] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Justin Uberti
- [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Dave Taht
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Chair request on video codec discussion, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard) Oct 28 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- [rtcweb] Chair request on video codec discussion, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Victor Pascual Avila
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Martin J. Dürst Oct 27 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- [rtcweb] Discussion on RMCAT traffic model in Vancouver (03 Nov, 1300-1500), Varun Singh
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, Randell Jesup Oct 26 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Monty Montgomery Oct 25 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Karl Stahl Oct 24 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Michael Tuexen
- [rtcweb] Minor update to Agenda for RTCWEB IETF88, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Stach, Thomas
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] RTP Simulcast proposal has been updated, Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Peter Saint-Andre Oct 23 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Definition of "webrtc-datachannel" protocol?, Salvatore Loreto
- [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Basil Mohamed Gohar Oct 22 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] [avtext] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- [rtcweb] [mmusic] Anycast discovery, Was TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Definition of "webrtc-datachannel" protocol?, Michael Tuexen
- [rtcweb] Definition of "webrtc-datachannel" protocol?, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson Oct 21 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05.txt, internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] NSA-issues TV news quote library, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Vijaya Mandava (vimandav)
- Re: [rtcweb] NSA-issues TV news quote library, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- [rtcweb] NSA-issues TV news quote library, Roger Macdonald
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, internet-drafts
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for draft-partha-rtcweb-jsep-sip-01.txt, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10.txt, internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-sdp-03.txt, Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-05.txt, Suhas Nandakumar Oct 20 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Ravindran, Parthasarathi (NSN - IN/Bangalore) Oct 19 2013
- [rtcweb] Additional identifiers for the Stats API from an XRBLOCK perspective, Varun Singh
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Justin Uberti Oct 18 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) Oct 17 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- [rtcweb] Registration for the second SIP Forum RTCWeb interop test event is open, Robert Sparks
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin)
- [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Kevin Dempsey
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin) Oct 16 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP: Order of m- lines in multiple PeerConnections, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin)
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin)
- [rtcweb] POF-iPAN-PAN, Suhas Nandakumar Oct 15 2013
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-03.txt, internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Ted Hardie Oct 14 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Mary Barnes
- [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, cowwoc
- [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, BeckW
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Mary Barnes
- [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft new version: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12 - WGLC comments implemented, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft new version: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12 - WGLC comments implemented, Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- [rtcweb] FW: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-05, Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] Draft new version: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12 - WGLC comments implemented, Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12.txt, internet-drafts Oct 13 2013
- [rtcweb] [dispatch] [MMUSIC] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ejzak-dispatch-webrtc-data-channel-sdpneg-00.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard) Oct 12 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Dan Wing Oct 11 2013
- [rtcweb] Fwd: [RAI] Fwd: NOMCOM 2013 - UPDATED 2nd Call for Nominations - APP, OAM, RAI, TSV, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Lee, Richard FTC
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, BeckW
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, BeckW Oct 10 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft RTCWeb Agenda for IETF 88, Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] Draft RTCWeb Agenda for IETF 88, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, BeckW Oct 08 2013
- [rtcweb] Updated drafts, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Justin Uberti Oct 07 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Payload Types assignments was Re: SV: [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Magnus Westerlund Oct 04 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, cb.list6 Oct 03 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- [rtcweb] Fwd: [rmcat] time to get busy, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Magnus Westerlund Oct 02 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Parthasarathi R Oct 01 2013
- Re: [rtcweb] additional ICE info, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Saverio Vardaro
- Re: [rtcweb] [mmusic] WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] unsubscribe, Xia, Junluan
- [rtcweb] [mmusic] TURN server address via DHCP, WGLC of draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-11, Karl Stahl
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]