rtcweb Discussion Archive - Thread Index - Oct 2013
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Date Index]- [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Timothy B. Terriberry
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Doug Geistkemper
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Eric Rescorla
- [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Bossiel thioriguel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Bossiel
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Ralph Giles
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Kristian Kielhofner
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Dave Taht
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- [rtcweb] API standardization on phones? (Re: Platforms that support H264), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] API standardization on phones? (Re: Platforms that support H264), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Kaiduan Xie
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264 (was: Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8), Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Platforms that support H264, Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Alessandro Amirante
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Alexandre GOUAILLARD
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Gregory Maxwell
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Erik Lagerway
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Gustavo Garcia
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Congratuiations on the Cisco announcement - but we still prefer VP8, David Singer
- [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Neil Stratford
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Richard Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Simon Perreault
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Chris Wendt
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Emil Ivov
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] On the topic of MTI video codecs, cowwoc
- [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg (jdrosen)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Peter Thatcher
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ethan Hugg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Max Jonas Werner
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Steve Sokol
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Göran Eriksson AP
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Paul Giralt
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Paul Giralt
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Kaiduan Xie
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Jack Moffitt
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Hermetic builds (Re: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings
- [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Kaiduan Xie
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 binary module (Was: Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees), Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Engel Nyst
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Gili
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), SM
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Ron
- [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), bryandonnovan
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), bryandonnovan
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), cowwoc
- [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we learned?, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we learned?, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we learned?, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we learned?, Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] Interoperability - what have we learned?, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise? what about no MTI?, Richard Shockey
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] Is there room for a compromise?, Jack Moffitt
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Dave Crocker
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Roman Shpount
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264's high-low play (Was: H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof)), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), SM
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 IPR disclosures (or persistent lack thereof), DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Ron
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Engel Nyst
- Re: [rtcweb] Cisco to open source its H.264 implementation and absorb MPEG-LA licensing fees, Engel Nyst
- [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Dave Taht
- Re: [rtcweb] [rmcat] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Adam Roach
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Dave Taht
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] [rmcat] compressed codec-free webrtc?, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] inactive m-lines in draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05, Justin Uberti
- [rtcweb] Chair request on video codec discussion, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Chair request on video codec discussion, Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- [rtcweb] Discussion on RMCAT traffic model in Vancouver (03 Nov, 1300-1500), Varun Singh
- Re: [rtcweb] Discussion on RMCAT traffic model in Vancouver (03 Nov, 1300-1500), Varun Singh
- Re: [rtcweb] Discussion on RMCAT traffic model in Vancouver (03 Nov, 1300-1500), Varun Singh
- [rtcweb] Minor update to Agenda for RTCWEB IETF88, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of rate-controlled H.264 Constrained High Profile, Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Maik Merten
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., John Leslie
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Thomas Reisinger
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Performance of H.264..., Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] RTP Simulcast proposal has been updated, Magnus Westerlund
- [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Stach, Thomas
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] New SDP O/A required if selected ICE candidate does not match c= line?, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Victor Pascual Avila
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, David Singer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cb.list6
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Leon Geyser
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Karl Stahl
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jack Moffitt
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Matthew Kaufman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - the core issue, Bjoern Hoehrmann
- [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Krasimir Kolarov
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] VP8 vs H.264 - subjective evaluation, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] Definition of "webrtc-datachannel" protocol?, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] Definition of "webrtc-datachannel" protocol?, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] Definition of "webrtc-datachannel" protocol?, Salvatore Loreto
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-05.txt, internet-drafts
- [rtcweb] NSA-issues TV news quote library, Roger Macdonald
- Re: [rtcweb] NSA-issues TV news quote library, Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] NSA-issues TV news quote library, Ted Hardie
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Matt Fredrickson
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Max Jonas Werner
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-01.txt, Randell Jesup
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, internet-drafts
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-06.txt, Michael Tuexen
- [rtcweb] FW: New Version Notification for draft-partha-rtcweb-jsep-sip-01.txt, Parthasarathi R
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage-10.txt, internet-drafts
- [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-sdp-03.txt, Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-05.txt, Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] Additional identifiers for the Stats API from an XRBLOCK perspective, Varun Singh
- [rtcweb] Registration for the second SIP Forum RTCWeb interop test event is open, Robert Sparks
- Re: [rtcweb] Registration for the second SIP Forum RTCWeb interop test event is open, Robert Sparks
- [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Kevin Dempsey
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] JSEP fingerprint hash requirements, Justin Uberti
- [rtcweb] POF-iPAN-PAN, Suhas Nandakumar
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-audio-03.txt, internet-drafts
- [rtcweb] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft, Adam Roach
- [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Bo Burman
- Re: [rtcweb] Comments on H.264 and VP8 performance comparisons, Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, cowwoc
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Mary Barnes
- Re: [rtcweb] H.264 versus VP8 - are we really going to spend 2 full hours rehashing this?, Ted Hardie
- [rtcweb] FW: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-05, Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] Draft new version: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12 - WGLC comments implemented, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft new version: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12 - WGLC comments implemented, Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft new version: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12 - WGLC comments implemented, Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin)
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin)
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin)
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] Query/Comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12, Chenxin (Xin)
- [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-12.txt, internet-drafts
- [rtcweb] [dispatch] [MMUSIC] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ejzak-dispatch-webrtc-data-channel-sdpneg-00.txt, Ejzak, Richard P (Richard)
- [rtcweb] Fwd: [RAI] Fwd: NOMCOM 2013 - UPDATED 2nd Call for Nominations - APP, OAM, RAI, TSV, Ted Hardie
- [rtcweb] Draft RTCWeb Agenda for IETF 88, Cullen Jennings
- Re: [rtcweb] Draft RTCWeb Agenda for IETF 88, Christer Holmberg
- [rtcweb] Updated drafts, Ted Hardie
- [rtcweb] Fwd: [rmcat] time to get busy, Ted Hardie
- [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Mandyam, Giridhar
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Parthasarathi R
- Re: [rtcweb] SRTP/AVPF/TCP in draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-01, Harald Alvestrand
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Date Index]