saag Discussion Archive - Date Index - 2020

saag Discussion Archive - Date Index - 2020

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]

Dec 29 2020

Re: [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis?, Metapolymath Majordomo
Re: [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis?, Metapolymath Majordomo
Re: [saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis?, Michael Richardson

Dec 28 2020

[saag] Will there be an RFC4949bis?, Ira McDonald

Dec 02 2020

Re: [saag] NCSC Protocol Design Principles, Andrew S2
[saag] NCSC Protocol Design Principles, Andrew S2

Nov 28 2020

Re: [saag] Call for SAAG comments on draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6, Benjamin Kaduk

Nov 25 2020

[saag] Call for SAAG comments on draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6, Juan Carlos Zuniga

Nov 20 2020

[saag] ACME meeting report, Salz, Rich
[saag] Secdispatch at IETF 109, Francesca Palombini

Nov 19 2020

Re: [saag] New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-ciphertext-format-00.txt, Carsten Bormann
[saag] EMU WG status, Mohit Sethi M
[saag] COSE report to SAAG, Matthew Miller
[saag] SACM WG report, Chris Inacio
Re: [saag] FW: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-ciphertext-format-00.txt, Michael Richardson

Nov 18 2020

Re: [saag] DRIP report to SAAG, Daniel Migault
[saag] ACE report to SAAG, Daniel Migault
[saag] RATS report to SAAG, Smith, Ned
[saag] CURDLE report to SAAG, Salz, Rich
[saag] ACME at IETF 109, Salz, Rich
[saag] Kitten WG report, Robbie Harwood
[saag] CFRG IETF 109 report, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
[saag] trans did not meet, Paul Wouters
[saag] OpenPGP wg notes for saag, Stephen Farrell
[saag] LAKE notes for saag, Stephen Farrell
[saag] DOTS WG report, Valery Smyslov
[saag] UTA WG report, Valery Smyslov
Re: [saag] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-05.txt, Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [saag] IPsecME report, Yoav Nir
[saag] IPsecME report, Yoav Nir
[saag] I2NSF Report, Yoav Nir
[saag] FW: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-ciphertext-format-00.txt, Yaron Sheffer
[saag] TEEP Session at IETF 109, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
[saag] GNAP at IETF-109, Yaron Sheffer
[saag] LAMPS Session at IETF 109, Russ Housley
[saag] TLS@IETF109: SAAG summary, Sean Turner

Nov 11 2020

[saag] Fwd: Webex meeting: Pre-IETF 109 Security Area Office Hours, Benjamin Kaduk

Nov 06 2020

[saag] FW: [Maprg] Agenda for 109 maprg session is online, Mirja Kuehlewind

Nov 04 2020

Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Michael Richardson

Nov 03 2020

[saag] Call for IETF 109 agenda items, Roman Danyliw

Oct 23 2020

[saag] saag - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109, "IETF Secretariat"

Oct 05 2020

[saag] FW: Jim Schaad, Roman Danyliw

Oct 04 2020

Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Dan Harkins
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Dan Harkins
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Alan DeKok
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Carsten Bormann
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Paul Hoffman
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Christian Huitema
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Peter Gutmann
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Dan Harkins

Oct 02 2020

Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Fernando Gont

Oct 01 2020

Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Carsten Bormann
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Dan Harkins

Sep 30 2020

Re: [saag] shorthand for iPAddress subjectAltName?, Michael Richardson

Sep 29 2020

[saag] shorthand for iPAddress subjectAltName?, Benjamin Kaduk

Sep 15 2020

[saag] saag - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool

Sep 02 2020

Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Carsten Bormann
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Behcet Sarikaya
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Christian Huitema
Re: [saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Eric Rescorla
[saag] can an on-path attacker drop traffic?, Michael Richardson

Aug 30 2020

[saag] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-lwig-curve-representations-12.txt> (Alternative Elliptic Curve Representations) to Informational RFC, Benjamin Kaduk

Aug 28 2020

Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Nico Williams
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Michael Richardson

Aug 26 2020

Re: [saag] height of PKI, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] height of PKI, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] height of PKI, Russ Housley
Re: [saag] height of PKI, Viktor Dukhovni
[saag] height of PKI, Michael Richardson

Aug 24 2020

Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Viktor Dukhovni
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Nico Williams

Aug 23 2020

[saag] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-foudil-securitytxt-10.txt, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Michael Richardson

Aug 22 2020

Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Nico Williams
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Viktor Dukhovni

Aug 21 2020

Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Yaron Sheffer
[saag] draft SAAG IETF 108 minutes posted, Benjamin Kaduk

Aug 20 2020

Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Michael Richardson

Aug 17 2020

Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Yaron Sheffer
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Christian Huitema
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Martin Thomson
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Michael Richardson

Aug 11 2020

[saag] Author promotion of draft-ietf-ntp-roughtime-01, Watson Ladd

Aug 06 2020

[saag] idevid-considerations at -- SecDispatch/IETF108, Michael Richardson

Jul 31 2020

[saag] Joint RIPE MATWG / IRTF MAPRG session next Wednesday, Aug 5, 13:00 UTC, Mirja Kuehlewind

Jul 30 2020

[saag] Pining and PKI, Daniel Migault
[saag] SecDispatch at IETF108, Francesca Palombini
[saag] Trans report - did not meet, Paul Wouters
[saag] NTP update for SAAG @ IETF 108, Karen O'Donoghue
[saag] ACE IETF108 report, Daniel Migault
[saag] SACM @ IETF 108, Karen O'Donoghue
Re: [saag] SUIT at IETF 108, Dave Thaler
[saag] PrivacyPass IETF 108 Report, Joseph Salowey
[saag] SUIT at IETF 108, Russ Housley
Re: [saag] saag meeting, Benjamin Kaduk
[saag] saag meeting, Fernando Gont
[saag] DOTS WG report, Valery Smyslov
[saag] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-05.txt, Fernando Gont
Re: [saag] AD evaluation of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-04, Fernando Gont
[saag] CURDLE IETF108 report, Daniel Migault
[saag] Fwd: ACME IETF 108 report, Benjamin Kaduk
[saag] Fwd: MLS IETF 108 report, Benjamin Kaduk

Jul 29 2020

[saag] volunteers for SAAG minute taker, jabber relay, Benjamin Kaduk
[saag] FW: RATs report - updated, Smith, Ned
[saag] COSE WG @ IETF-108 Report, Matthew A. Miller
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Daniel Migault
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Richard Barnes
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Yaron Sheffer
[saag] UTA WG report, Valery Smyslov
[saag] CFRG IETF 108 report, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Peter Gutmann
[saag] TLS WG report for SAAG, Christopher Wood

Jul 28 2020

[saag] Kitten WG report, Robbie Harwood
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Nico Williams
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Ben Laurie
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Carsten Bormann
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Salz, Rich
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Ben Laurie
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Stephen Farrell
[saag] On PKI vs. Pinning (SAAG 108 preview), Benjamin Kaduk
[saag] IPsec WG Report for SAAG, Tero Kivinen
[saag] EMU @ IETF 108 status, Mohit Sethi M
[saag] LAMPS at IETF 108, Russ Housley
[saag] LAKE WG report for SAAG, Stephen Farrell
[saag] gnap report IETF-108, Leif Johansson
[saag] TEEP report, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
[saag] RATs report, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)

Jul 27 2020

[saag] draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15: Conclusion of 3rd WGLC, Black, David

Jul 26 2020

[saag] SEC AD Office Hours at IETF 108, Roman Danyliw

Jul 21 2020

[saag] pidloc sidemeeting at IETF 108, Behcet Sarikaya
[saag] Fwd: AD evaluation of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-04, Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Benjamin Kaduk
[saag] Fwd: AD evaluation of draft-gont-numeric-ids-sec-considerations-04, Benjamin Kaduk

Jul 17 2020

[saag] draft SAAG agenda for IETF 108 posted, Benjamin Kaduk

Jul 13 2020

Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Yakov Shafranovich
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Yakov Shafranovich

Jul 07 2020

[saag] SAAG IETF 108 call for agenda items, Benjamin Kaduk

Jul 06 2020

[saag] Call for IETF 108 agenda items, Roman Danyliw

Jul 04 2020

Re: [saag] Anticompetitive use of trademark and IETF activities, John R Levine
Re: [saag] Anticompetitive use of trademark and IETF activities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] Anticompetitive use of trademark and IETF activities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] Anticompetitive use of trademark and IETF activities, John Levine
Re: [saag] Anticompetitive use of trademark and IETF activities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] Anticompetitive use of trademark and IETF activities, Jeffrey Walton

Jul 03 2020

Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Michael Richardson

Jul 02 2020

Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] [tsvwg] [Int-area] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
Re: [saag] [Int-area] [tsvwg] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, tom petch
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Benjamin Kaduk

Jul 01 2020

Re: [saag] [Int-area] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Behcet Sarikaya
Re: [saag] [Int-area] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Joseph Touch
Re: [saag] [Int-area] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Dirk.von-Hugo
Re: [saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Kyle Rose
Re: [saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Ruediger.Geib
Re: [saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, mohamed.boucadair
Re: [saag] [tsvwg] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Colin Perkins
Re: [saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Michael Richardson

Jun 30 2020

[saag] results of IETF LC for draft-foudil-securitytxt-08 and next steps, Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Eric Rescorla

Jun 27 2020

Re: [saag] [Anima] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] [Anima] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [saag] [Anima] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] [Anima] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Brian E Carpenter
Re: [saag] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Michael Richardson

Jun 26 2020

Re: [saag] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Russ Housley
Re: [saag] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Nico Williams
[saag] towards using of MUST-/SHOULD+/SHOULD- in draft-ietf-autonomic-control-plane-24, Michael Richardson

Jun 19 2020

Re: [saag] [tsvwg] [Int-area] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Gorry Fairhurst

Jun 18 2020

Re: [saag] [tsvwg] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Holland, Jake
Re: [saag] [Int-area] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Tom Herbert
Re: [saag] [tsvwg] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Roni Even

Jun 17 2020

Re: [saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Kyle Rose

Jun 12 2020

[saag] Anticompetitive use of trademark and IETF activities, Tony Rutkowski

Jun 09 2020

Re: [saag] [tsvwg] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Paul Vixie
[saag] 3rd WGLC (limited-scope): draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-15, closes 29 June 2020, Black, David

Apr 20 2020

[saag] Fwd: [Model-t] Today's call agenda, Dominique Lazanski

Apr 01 2020

[saag] security as immunology, Henry Story

Mar 28 2020

Re: [saag] CCPA Do-Not-Sell, Sebastian Zimmeck

Mar 26 2020

Re: [saag] [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – Side Meeting, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – Side Meeting, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
Re: [saag] [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – Side Meeting, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – Side Meeting, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – Side Meeting, Phillip Hallam-Baker
[saag] CCPA Do-Not-Sell, Sebastian Zimmeck

Mar 25 2020

[saag] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – Side Meeting, Yaron Sheffer

Mar 23 2020

Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Robert Moskowitz
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Benjamin Kaduk

Mar 18 2020

Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Dan Brown
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Hao, Feng
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Christopher Wood
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Jon Callas
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Mark D. Baushke
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Dan Brown
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Salz, Rich
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Christopher Wood
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Robert Moskowitz
Re: [saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Salz, Rich
[saag] Perfect Forward Secrecy vs Forward Secrecy, Robert Moskowitz

Feb 28 2020

Re: [saag] 2nd WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-12, closes 16 March 2020, Black, David
[saag] 2nd WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08, closes 23 October 2019, Black, David

Feb 24 2020

[saag] Call for IETF 107 agenda items, Roman Danyliw

Feb 22 2020

Re: [saag] Netdev 0x14 co-located with IETF107, Daniel Migault

Feb 21 2020

Re: [saag] Review request: SFC/NSH Integrity (draft-rebo-sfc-nsh-integrity), Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy

Feb 18 2020

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson

Feb 17 2020

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Finch
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Viktor Dukhovni
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson

Feb 15 2020

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams

Feb 14 2020

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Watson Ladd
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
[saag] Netdev 0x14 co-located with IETF107, Daniel Migault

Feb 13 2020

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Finch

Feb 12 2020

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Peter Gutmann
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Eric Rescorla
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Eric Rescorla

Feb 11 2020

Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Stephen Farrell
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Henry Story
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Nico Williams
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Watson Ladd
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Derek Atkins
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Derek Atkins
Re: [saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Tony Rutkowski
[saag] post-X509 cryptographic identities, Michael Richardson

Feb 07 2020

Re: [saag] Review request: SFC/NSH Integrity (draft-rebo-sfc-nsh-integrity), Benjamin Kaduk

Jan 31 2020

[saag] Review request: SFC/NSH Integrity (draft-rebo-sfc-nsh-integrity), mohamed.boucadair

Jan 27 2020

Re: [saag] NIST draft report on routing security, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Re: [saag] NIST draft report on routing security, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)

Jan 24 2020

Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Robert Moskowitz

Jan 21 2020

Re: [saag] [EXTERNAL]Re: [Secdispatch] SECDISPATCH WG Summary from IETF 106, Mike Ounsworth

Jan 18 2020

Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Michael Richardson
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Benjamin Kaduk

Jan 17 2020

Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Peter Gutmann
Re: [saag] SECDISPATCH WG Summary from IETF 106, Brian Campbell
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Dan Brown
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Viktor Dukhovni
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Daniel Van Geest
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Peter Gutmann
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Benjamin Kaduk

Jan 16 2020

Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Santosh Chokhani
Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Dan Brown

Jan 15 2020

Re: [saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Peter Gutmann
[saag] NSA bug in Windows 10, Phillip Hallam-Baker

Jan 10 2020

Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Viktor Dukhovni
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Peter Gutmann

Jan 09 2020

Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Watson Ladd
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Black, David
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Peter Gutmann

Jan 08 2020

Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Alan DeKok
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Andrey Jivsov
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Jeffrey Walton
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Christian Huitema
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Peter Gutmann

Jan 07 2020

Re: [saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Phillip Hallam-Baker
[saag] SHA-1 is a Shambles: First Chosen-Prefix Collision on SHA-1, Russ Housley
[saag] Side channel resistance, threshold signatures, etc., Phillip Hallam-Baker

[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]