spud Discussion Archive - Date Index - 2016
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]-
Dec 05 2016
- [Spud] New PLUS mailing list, side meeting and future steps, Mirja Kühlewind Nov 15 2016
- Re: [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Brian Trammell Nov 14 2016
- Re: [Spud] [ALU] Re: States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] [ALU] Re: States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] PLUS side meeting in Seoul, Tuesday 12:15, Brian Trammell Nov 11 2016
- [Spud] States in draft-trammell-plus-statefulness-00, Dave Dolson Sep 06 2016
- Re: [Spud] Can Malicious users can use PLUS layer to force their traffic through firewalls in the network?, Mirja Kühlewind Aug 19 2016
- [Spud] Can Malicious users can use PLUS layer to force their traffic through firewalls in the network?, Linda Dunbar Aug 10 2016
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Kyle Rose Aug 06 2016
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell Aug 03 2016
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Kyle Rose
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] draft PLUS BoF minutes posted, Black, David Aug 02 2016
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Eliot Lear Aug 01 2016
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell Jul 31 2016
- [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Michael Tuexen
- [Spud] Extensibility considered harmful? was Re: [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Michael Tuexen
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Mirja Kühlewind Jul 30 2016
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephan Neuhaus
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephan Neuhaus
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Mirja Kühlewind Jul 29 2016
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephan Neuhaus
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Kyle Rose
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] [Privsec-program] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Kyle Rose
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Kyle Rose
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Brian Trammell
- [Spud] Detecting and Defeating TCP/IP Hypercookie Attacks, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Eliot Lear
- [Spud] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Brian Trammell Jul 28 2016
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Erik Nygren
- Re: [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Dave Dolson
- [Spud] Bare-minimum PLUS (was Re: Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF), Erik Nygren Jul 27 2016
- Re: [Spud] Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF, Kyle Rose
- Re: [Spud] Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF, Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF, Kyle Rose
- Re: [Spud] Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF, Kyle Rose
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Tom Herbert Jul 26 2016
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- [Spud] draft PLUS BoF minutes posted, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Christian Huitema
- [Spud] Thoughts on monitoring a network of only UDP traffic, Dave Dolson Jul 25 2016
- Re: [Spud] Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group Jul 24 2016
- [Spud] Thoughts on the privacy concerns expressed at the BoF, Kyle Rose Jul 22 2016
- Re: [Spud] questions on the BoF outcome, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Spud] questions on the BoF outcome, G Fairhurst
- Re: [Spud] questions on the BoF outcome, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] questions on the BoF outcome, Ian Swett
- [Spud] A few comments on Brian's proposal, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [Spud] questions on the BoF outcome, Szilveszter Nadas
- [Spud] questions on the BoF outcome, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB) Jul 21 2016
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Frode Kileng
- Re: [Spud] PLUS charter rev. 23 June, mls.ietf
- Re: [Spud] [E] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Mishra, Sanjay
- Re: [Spud] The PLUS BOF today and why should PLUS be better than the pack?, mls.ietf
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Spud] The PLUS BOF today and why should PLUS be better than the pack?, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- Re: [Spud] PLUS charter rev. 23 June, Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Mikael Abrahamsson
- [Spud] The PLUS BOF today and why should PLUS be better than the pack?, Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Frode Kileng
- Re: [Spud] PLUS charter rev. 23 June, Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Frode Kileng
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Frode Kileng
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Natasha Rooney
- [Spud] No. Operators don't need SPUD for mobile network management, Frode Kileng Jul 20 2016
- [Spud] SPUD/PLUS Integrity, Dave Dolson
- [Spud] SPUD/PLUS and ECN feedback, Dave Dolson Jul 10 2016
- Re: [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Tom Herbert Jul 08 2016
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-01.txt, Tom Herbert Jul 07 2016
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-01.txt, Aaron Falk
- [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-01.txt, Tom Herbert Jul 03 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Yoav Nir
- Re: [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Brian Trammell Jul 01 2016
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Diego R. Lopez Jun 30 2016
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Joe Touch Jun 29 2016
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
- [Spud] 答复: endpoint control, Youjianjie Jun 28 2016
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB)
- [Spud] endpoint control, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Joe Touch Jun 27 2016
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Tom Herbert
- [Spud] related draft in TSVWG, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] 答复: endpoint control, Youjianjie Jun 25 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert Jun 24 2016
- [Spud] plus - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 96, "IETF Secretariat"
- [Spud] 答复: PLUS charter rev. 23 June, Youjianjie Jun 23 2016
- [Spud] PLUS charter rev. 23 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] 答复: endpoint control, Youjianjie
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] 答复: endpoint control, Youjianjie Jun 22 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] 答复: endpoint control, Youjianjie
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] 答复: endpoint control, Youjianjie Jun 21 2016
- Re: [Spud] [QUIC] Segment offload for UDP-based protocols Re: Requirements, Ian Swett
- Re: [Spud] endpoint control, Brian Trammell Jun 20 2016
- [Spud] endpoint control, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- [Spud] Details about PLUS BoF, Natasha Rooney
- [Spud] meeting conflicts, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Mirja Kühlewind Jun 18 2016
- Re: [Spud] [QUIC] Network Path Requirements for QUIC, Jana Iyengar Jun 16 2016
- Re: [Spud] [QUIC] Network Path Requirements for QUIC, Brian Trammell Jun 15 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell Jun 14 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, 🔓Dan Wing
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Szilveszter Nadas
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Ca By Jun 13 2016
- [Spud] plus - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 96, "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool"
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Szilveszter Nadas
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Szilveszter Nadas
- [Spud] plus - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 96, "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" Jun 11 2016
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch Jun 10 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert Jun 09 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [QUIC] Segment offload for UDP-based protocols Re: Requirements, Randall Stewart
- [Spud] Segment offload for UDP-based protocols Re: [QUIC] Requirements, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell Jun 08 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Jana Iyengar
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell Jun 07 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Ted Hardie
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Aaron Falk Jun 06 2016
- Re: [Spud] [QUIC] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Jim Roskind Jun 05 2016
- Re: [Spud] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Tom Herbert Jun 03 2016
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Ca By Jun 02 2016
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13.txt> (UDP Usage Guidelines) to Best Current Practice, Brian Trammell Jun 01 2016
- [Spud] Minor comment to draft-trammell-spud-req-04, Szilveszter Nadas
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Szilveszter Nadas
- [Spud] updated draft PLUS charter, rev. 1 June, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell May 31 2016
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell May 26 2016
- Re: [Spud] updated PLUS charter, Brian Trammell May 25 2016
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Szilveszter Nadas
- Re: [Spud] Lars: updated PLUS charter, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] updated PLUS charter, Aaron Falk
- Re: [Spud] updated PLUS charter, Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Fan, Peng May 24 2016
- [Spud] updated PLUS charter, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] on NAT timers in UDP (Fwd: [Maprg] Is UDP a trash heap?), Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mark Nottingham May 23 2016
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- [Spud] What middleboxes are allowed to know (Re: [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF), Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mark Nottingham May 22 2016
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Jana Iyengar May 21 2016
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) May 20 2016
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Christian Huitema
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Ian Swett
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Ian Swett
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Dave Dolson
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert May 19 2016
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Ca By
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Joe Touch
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- [Spud] SPUD: good reading, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Toerless Eckert
- [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-herbert-transports-over-udp-00.txt, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Tom Herbert
- Re: [Spud] [Stackevo-discuss] Fwd: Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- [Spud] Possible WG-forming follow-on to SPUD BoF, Brian Trammell Apr 29 2016
- [Spud] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-trammell-spud-req-03.txt, Brian Trammell Apr 04 2016
- [Spud] New SPUD requirements and use cases, Brian Trammell Mar 24 2016
- Re: [Spud] Some initial comments on Requirements for the design of a Substrate Protocol for User Datagrams (SPUD), gorry
- Re: [Spud] Some initial comments on Requirements for the design of a Substrate Protocol for User Datagrams (SPUD), Mirja Kühlewind Jan 27 2016
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Brian E Carpenter Jan 26 2016
- Re: [Spud] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Spud] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [Spud] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Bless, Roland (TM)
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] [tsvwg] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Brian Trammell
- Re: [Spud] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Michael Welzl
- Re: [Spud] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Bless, Roland (TM)
- [Spud] One bit for latency bandwidth tradeoff, Youjianjie Jan 18 2016
- [Spud] Some initial comments on Requirements for the design of a Substrate Protocol for User Datagrams (SPUD), gorry
[Newer Messages] [Older Messages] [Thread Index]