Subject
From
Date
List
[TLS] consensus to drop non-ECC DSA from TLS 1.3 spec? (was: DSA should die)[TLS] consensus to drop non-ECC DSA from TLS 1.3 spec? (was: DSA should die)
Dave Garrett
2015-05-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/qWdun8_4rDDLIKuwFQAyWgchk-E/
2021914
1641448
Re: [TLS] consensus to drop non-ECC DSA from TLS 1.3 spec? (was: DSA should die)Re: [TLS] consensus to drop non-ECC DSA from TLS 1.3 spec? (was: DSA should die)
Kurt Roeckx
2015-05-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/k3Y3kN8MN3nhcpVJjd0xuaJCQSI/
2021983
1641448
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Peter Gutmann
2015-05-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Jyh50iAd2RLn4LRYrUHuWrcp0P4/
2021682
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Andrei Popov
2015-05-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/RzR06gUs7AYuuPwb7mMFfNad1HY/
2021838
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Martin Rex
2015-05-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/769hezqYLNihBcVwM5LOYOs8n2o/
2021928
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Andrei Popov
2015-05-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/mZgNosQ2DZGkxNVRAplGpaJpxvY/
2022608
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Martin Rex
2015-05-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Hb8dgOB-MwLw6Ha44tOjiuz2oxI/
2022651
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Dave Garrett
2015-05-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/xOlea1Np_45UQUbnF7hr6HVPJt8/
2022671
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Martin Rex
2015-05-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/V0JAaqeWctb7YZ152k_-EZnDTlA/
2022676
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Dave Garrett
2015-05-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/m43h1aIorABJgDMPqR-J4Ml92os/
2022688
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Peter Gutmann
2015-05-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/RA0qQNkPAQwjBaRPt6HfTrz2sn0/
2022782
1641449
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poiRe: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169)) I wonder if anyone is reading the full subject line or does it just get truncated at some poi
Watson Ladd
2015-05-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/137m6Dj1roTW6lhigtH-UDdEOUc/
2023223
1641449
[TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169))[TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169))
Dave Garrett
2015-05-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/hO_fPkqZvOsz9z-rNJXhGBPFBt8/
2021496
1641450
Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169))Re: [TLS] relax certificate_list requirements - opinion call (was Re: [tls13-spec] relax certificate_list ordering requirements to match current practice (#169))
Geoffrey Keating
2015-05-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/za7WKFRZKrqBcwiKn401EDcebW8/
2021511
1641450
[TLS] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: (with COMMENT)[TLS] Barry Leiba's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-session-hash-05: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Mlt2Z_qq7SUHqr9AOEO1oYRs7Ik/
2020887
1641451
[TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?[TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?
Jeffrey Walton
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/PvqLR89xAEn61GA9pLVf0O_V0X8/
2020863
1641452
Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?
Ilari Liusvaara
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/p8Hfy2Wypfva00V5g3fVuYuHCWs/
2020882
1641452
Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?
Dave Garrett
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/8Yd9ejVFEUJBlle8l9yvCC-RpR4/
2020972
1641452
Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?
Tom Ritter
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/SlXXfJubFTq56JIhOGAEwHUCiEo/
2021004
1641452
Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?
Dave Garrett
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Pxqy-6oWF-Ow71l1K24zmE1hDU4/
2021012
1641452
Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?Re: [TLS] Why is padding still actively being used?
Tom Ritter
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/MdkPbSwwo5UdkmDuFKsqn2u8ETE/
2021034
1641452
Re: [TLS] paddingRe: [TLS] padding
Dave Garrett
2015-08-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/tfk5goG6ntImHOS6uzPU5ZKNoFk/
2073895
1641452
Re: [TLS] paddingRe: [TLS] padding
Russ Housley
2015-08-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/_L_IoZ850QbNLWVRvOrFAvB9Hus/
2073998
1641452
Re: [TLS] paddingRe: [TLS] padding
Dave Garrett
2015-08-23
tls
/arch/msg/tls/6ura4-ISmRkMwy4oefaLSm8-sWc/
2074015
1641452
Re: [TLS] paddingRe: [TLS] padding
Tom Ritter
2015-08-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/LoUNH2e4vnfXOJQhN9bke-NJ0us/
2074543
1641452
Re: [TLS] paddingRe: [TLS] padding
Stephen Farrell
2015-08-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/P31u0mHG-YgyuZLde5cCg_0x2K8/
2074545
1641452
Re: [TLS] paddingRe: [TLS] padding
Martin Thomson
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/SsFLU03rG9IVu2fBnBf2VhGnM3w/
2074556
1641452
[TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)[TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)
Dave Garrett
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/5Gfi2djzjHzeKiIkOgCqWcrd6NU/
2074593
1641452
Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)
Martin Thomson
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/biM87Mb1MJ9cCSyL17avp9a9cZw/
2074628
1641452
Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)
Kyle Rose
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/2WJma3BWkyg31vHRaTtPATzU4m4/
2074772
1641452
Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)
Viktor Dukhovni
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/e-D7ZYmruqGLUeOx_kjRd3zY8Dc/
2074777
1641452
Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)
Martin Thomson
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/pEzSfs0QRi934vpMZw5xM6rciHU/
2074808
1641452
Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)Re: [TLS] Headerless records (was: padding)
Martin Thomson
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/gCAae9LV3-mbaQVIaTpECyHufgg/
2074805
1641452
Re: [TLS] paddingRe: [TLS] padding
Yoav Nir
2015-08-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/QPVfMSRbHQ8UjKohqqTCS79Vgz0/
2074652
1641452
[TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)[TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)
Dave Garrett
2015-05-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/V6lZIQq2AxNNUibggaldsxGDCys/
2020859
1641453
Re: [TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)Re: [TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)
Eric Rescorla
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/fnbRgoZQskYWcttmhsNoClFmbjA/
2020862
1641453
Re: [TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)Re: [TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)
Dave Garrett
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ttAKbDNPJkfK4mNpJ0uo_aGZ1RU/
2020867
1641453
Re: [TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)Re: [TLS] Encrypt content type (#51) + Remove TLSCiphertext.version (#144)
Eric Rescorla
2015-05-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/6B3vubDNti3TLjno2WGBoLANupM/
2020879
1641453
[TLS] Status of Cha-Cha/Poly Cipher Suites?[TLS] Status of Cha-Cha/Poly Cipher Suites?
Jeffrey Walton
2015-05-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/YZ9E2wUZe4-no7tXhooMvPUqmj8/
2020833
1641454
Re: [TLS] Status of Cha-Cha/Poly Cipher Suites?Re: [TLS] Status of Cha-Cha/Poly Cipher Suites?
Yoav Nir
2015-05-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/K7QoqSGzvwzT4QpYziGEHt1xuzM/
2020841
1641454
30684 Messages