Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/E48iLxKyUvUsqNLag9wQciSI1zc/
1431201
1642593
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ElsEmnaUExv0ecGY0HPbkekoes0/
1431200
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/E0GTebORYmwmnu96u3XuJrBJuis/
1431199
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/MFFXtSgx4XMlRMQnBdW---jQG6E/
1431198
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/RpFSVe5QC8NZ-2_jgJIV48EH1xA/
1431197
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/UxxPVZg5ALr59jR6VzCTVYuz_TU/
1431196
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DiTOiP7NK37ucJOIw0ZoRXhIUgs/
1431195
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Geoffrey Keating
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/4zxsrZ8iBp2BVpSgyqI6cJNTfa8/
1431194
1642590
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/28P7UsVIezvbSsaybGs_6gEaA-4/
1431193
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/kCEdaKnYytIvRcYodOXxtl8KQ9o/
1431192
1642593
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/QkkSFZna69hfbeOGySOg_X7fIl4/
1431191
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/zE9rVH4eAwU3St-JOEWZsL1CBnU/
1431190
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/3u4vPnoa2nNGsguf9iShljnupdg/
1431189
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/BxX9yPEK8XeqoIjBtXOf-mF5X2Q/
1431188
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/HCFPycUE04nMGOKqlFN0iSpBshM/
1431187
1642590
Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 88Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 88
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Tqrg8ly6sIz_XqVO0XgZl2VhRQw/
1431186
1642590
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/lQ69M9getkTKYlDPe5Er54Qgm4A/
1431185
1642593
Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 88Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 88
Ravi Ganesan
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/YUZrdEMGeokD26i5mG2JteZStgw/
1431184
1642590
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Nasko Oskov
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/PzBh5RANuyE4tC-n2kMa3zwXB9A/
1431183
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/EumgfuAbYQLgSxhHiWBj7NpSuDc/
1431182
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/w0dfFT-iTLP2i_0O18U1bHx4VLU/
1431181
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/vgfTp2FgEWK25zaS36M46zqIUC8/
1431180
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Dr Stephen Henson
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/U_0iuG7PVfI2hQXCwm6I_0T21Zs/
1431179
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/6zeVDExPRnUpbat0-cms46DE-nY/
1431178
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/euflRfrGC1w3Ac8hX4AvM9ehyVY/
1431177
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/XfdS_5Kw1dg2I6U7Ze4tB1rkUu0/
1431176
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/WFUC7z_Cb_pJwKuN0NNSOakP9is/
1431175
1642593
Re: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated HandshakeRe: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated Handshake
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/LlyTPuvjY44-zVickuKz2X23t7A/
1431174
1642592
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Yoav Nir
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/nDmrwagCKQcjg6Bc54b0hJmSiRM/
1431173
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Pasi.Eronen
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/0HNXe2ZRs5BzGyw8Spo_DVTdzAk/
1431172
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/NXSDRyqn57ZTM2MYAA1Bsj0gi2E/
1431171
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Martin Rex
2009-12-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/eN_YTw-__gmQuk9O6BX2nLQyQWY/
1431170
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Steve Checkoway
2009-12-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/SxmRO3Grnyk4ygnDW_sIp_XX6i4/
1431169
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-12-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ab4qNbBCYRDMAPFcCorNIfKGBhY/
1431168
1642593
Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 86Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 86
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/lNdx60GfpeGaeYVhMzuzNkUTvIY/
1431167
1642591
Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 86Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 65, Issue 86
Ravi Ganesan
2009-12-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/wObiBlyPZL_x9Fv8ZDP03HNsJyE/
1431166
1642591
Re: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated HandshakeRe: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated Handshake
Ravi Ganesan
2009-12-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/CJJIiHXNStbkwmHv-YTxra92700/
1431165
1642592
Re: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated HandshakeRe: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated Handshake
David-Sarah Hopwood
2009-12-20
tls
/arch/msg/tls/UPxhBB2839uT3ovwJZI-qzDNe_Y/
1431164
1642592
Re: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated HandshakeRe: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated Handshake
Martin Rex
2009-12-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/UvDUa3R7lTDxXBZYFbey1k7HY8A/
1431163
1642592
Re: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated HandshakeRe: [TLS] Abbreviated Handshake != Renegotiated Handshake
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/bw2bR67SSDOouWunuFX04no2NB8/
1431162
1642592
40 Messages