Subject
From
Date
List
[TLS] Review of Dragonfly PAKE[TLS] Review of Dragonfly PAKE
Trevor Perrin
2013-12-10
tls
/arch/msg/tls/A_SfHI4BsdAi4miklBs3TvUbu-Y/
1436602
1641988
Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKERe: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKE
Dan Harkins
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DXTeph4fAkmOUmEn43EQZ2kUDa4/
1436604
1641988
Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKERe: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKE
Trevor Perrin
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/KU8494qyJqwjzGmZXbM5DNTw-6o/
1436613
1641988
Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKERe: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKE
Dan Harkins
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Q2m6ufVOcRgGr-40zhkxJ5d3zQU/
1436615
1641988
Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKERe: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKE
Trevor Perrin
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/yobtwA9VACECokktUcgPEVeI-c8/
1436617
1641988
Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKERe: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKE
Dan Harkins
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/7yqEpj2aOgoKjZ9p_cCAfl5rw88/
1436618
1641988
Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKERe: [TLS] [Cfrg] Review of Dragonfly PAKE
Watson Ladd
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/HzGZWhQpXQKw8j_yNT-BBMEI0w0/
1436605
1641988
[TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)[TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Brian Smith
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/w6rxpxnavqJEWBs_ZtYcWZDZYyQ/
1436572
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Hannes Tschofenig
2013-12-10
tls
/arch/msg/tls/j4pfSNx6Bg-Y-4dTIRH34Ew5EtQ/
1436598
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Tom Ritter
2013-12-10
tls
/arch/msg/tls/dcaJ67InSq-w_pzOewbliIua86g/
1436599
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Stephen Farrell
2013-12-10
tls
/arch/msg/tls/fAGtdoKBhIgffR0kGyBGK8fIDVY/
1436601
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/erHGsjipFL2knVghTuH6F1DNubI/
1436607
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Stephen Farrell
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/aixnVnNTNxSa3K_9-NoiW3Vm9J0/
1436608
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Yoav Nir
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/7c6HrvU5VDKzmYRttpqU9NvjVMA/
1436609
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/aoIbq_tlsT7VN_ieTWt0Gsh4kMQ/
1436614
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Yoav Nir
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/UAKkm6sXz_ijMx3SEdzsAiVeA_U/
1436616
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Brian Smith
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/y3V4KED2gG-qas7NpOjs9KhL0NQ/
1436619
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Watson Ladd
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/NRxnXGGWvWX3c8pAXKE4p_n6whU/
1436621
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Brian Smith
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ONLOHdFUquImfnCAePIOzY8m31w/
1436622
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Stephan Friedl (sfriedl)
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/bmx_edFMR7vwnHZhphNdCR8ZW7c/
1436640
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Bill Frantz
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/olaD5i8qiSHHq9BmXyp_npOaAH8/
1436612
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Brian Smith
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/JeuHPQpQypoqAbzD6N_bcogTXFE/
1436620
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Bill Frantz
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/XNtM6hjBPb533H_OVs7TTmY81us/
1436641
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Eric Rescorla
2013-12-11
tls
/arch/msg/tls/VRq-PJqtb8Yx2LzC6fw1_epTZpk/
1436606
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Brian Smith
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/JsbfQw-KwRtxfQ-FUkmwYzFOuXY/
1436623
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Wan-Teh Chang
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/vghIxgt_pu8jSBTSQ0Jc0dgGUSM/
1436624
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Paul Hoffman
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/AYQsFk78PZibj-Z-V8z8T2JPzUA/
1436625
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Watson Ladd
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/zqgGjee_s7xdMMLLXJDno-lBkNA/
1436626
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Eric Rescorla
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/09MyCBAa1jbEH8JKMK7Rh_rO0Xc/
1436627
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Ralf Skyper Kaiser
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/UwY-VOQ0JTAjz-YPIBXN9ogaRP0/
1436630
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Yoav Nir
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/aII0GzojgSR4FyPYwdedu9gqpM4/
1436631
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DIrKeVNAuQWA7mX-kpekFvvCegE/
1436635
1641989
Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] A new consensus call on ALPN vs NPN (was ALPN concerns)
Alyssa Rowan
2013-12-12
tls
/arch/msg/tls/kFik1lFOegkudhZdfmTj4Y_wYbk/
1436639
1641989
[TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)[TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)
Brian Smith
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/74mj52k0z4ROrr-3vHRK5oglOik/
1436570
1641990
Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)
Alfredo Pironti
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/f5gF8WiuRh6pu76GJ8xN6ATO7zw/
1436573
1641990
Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)
Brian Smith
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/9FxIsjcEmMXB3KrKOQXtL5Ld9FI/
1436574
1641990
Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)
Alfredo Pironti
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/_RMLo7Ix1rn6Y5kohN6tXEiLF5I/
1436575
1641990
Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)
Andrei Popov
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/m5L58oKXoIq-Dt0-jGtJ2kaYx8A/
1436585
1641990
Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)
Martin Thomson
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/nc-fdt8yj0VZo6SOCea37zEoEE4/
1436586
1641990
Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)Re: [TLS] How ALPN makes the http2-tls-relaxed option less secure, compared to NPN (was Re: ALPN concerns)
Watson Ladd
2013-12-09
tls
/arch/msg/tls/3Ji4-SNtwKoBz3qML0HJFWAnaUE/
1436576
1641990
45 Messages