Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/NTpvKh_WkGP_sbeQESJFJVw3E-k/
1436339
1642003
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Zooko Wilcox-OHearn
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/wU5ovzQLs2jjUfjElEgM7DXhypY/
1436338
1642005
[TLS] TLS protocol version intolerance [Was: Re: Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed][TLS] TLS protocol version intolerance [Was: Re: Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed]
Ivan Ristić
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/aFS1brjfUy-GHq2oefTFCjKjzKM/
1436337
1642005
Re: [TLS] Final nail in the coffin for cleartext SNI/ALPN in TLS 1.3Re: [TLS] Final nail in the coffin for cleartext SNI/ALPN in TLS 1.3
Bodo Moeller
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/of1l3wsn31Kg0eNf6ELxMhbP2XE/
1436336
1642016
Re: [TLS] Final nail in the coffin for cleartext SNI/ALPN in TLS 1.3Re: [TLS] Final nail in the coffin for cleartext SNI/ALPN in TLS 1.3
Ralf Skyper Kaiser
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/16NAq0V5Fy1HGhtReFSLI1FU53M/
1436335
1642016
Re: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwdRe: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwd
Bodo Moeller
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/tPBSeZOyYWagIzD6ZzFVbVzQ2uc/
1436334
1642012
Re: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwdRe: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwd
oscar.koeroo
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/lstsL8bDA6Ap2BS9VVgtrUUHhCM/
1436333
1642012
Re: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwdRe: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwd
Ralf Skyper Kaiser
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/mg9Txaos9UCYeXnjVI0aCDi_AEs/
1436332
1642012
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Ben Laurie
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/wlCVJacXMER9A_60wWeYYp4UkP8/
1436331
1642005
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:
Bodo Moeller
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/51Gq0avojSJ4U65MUO0U3lEuqrI/
1436330
1642007
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Ralf Skyper Kaiser
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/cHls-XI1QyH3LzpQ4qyrSpVwq2A/
1436329
1642005
Re: [TLS] Salsa vs. ChaChaRe: [TLS] Salsa vs. ChaCha
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/TUvBHPdJ7XxPSOgW2nJ8DGixL9k/
1436328
1642002
Re: [TLS] ALPN concernsRe: [TLS] ALPN concerns
Brian Smith
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/v7tEam3Wi5GjpEXxF_71qPY0Ojo/
1436327
1642020
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Marsh Ray
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/bvLHmwJtwlylO1rf0emicxELc4o/
1436326
1642005
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:
Marsh Ray
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/F7nBH9YTQ0Lrn-9DuBc01tIU2ys/
1436325
1642007
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Andy Wilson
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/QpbqEH4ftg9U3qpSvXbemmY_m6I/
1436324
1642005
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/8dEgfFePmehMsyF7eGxNNzGYw4E/
1436323
1642003
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Geoffrey Keating
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/SyFeRDHrRCBPoT4xFOrLnVIytyY/
1436322
1642003
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Kirils Solovjovs
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/CGKCn4EN_a32Y4F6Yz0IzgtPXWc/
1436321
1642005
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Oed4XkGl_90pngWp9UydBSxPzkw/
1436320
1642003
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Andy Lutomirski
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/pPxswQ0ksxJjoaibqj51cJMWyi0/
1436319
1642005
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-MAC again (was Re: padding bug)Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-MAC again (was Re: padding bug)
Martin Rex
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/7IqFu2P5qNByCBbZqlfGsvul-LU/
1436318
1642093
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Martin Rex
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/h2jUlb_oUXsRXzUGvgg0xmxV7KI/
1436317
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Martin Rex
2013-11-19
tls
/arch/msg/tls/t223XvEHCPU3LTIDy1ONvKB66TA/
1436316
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Joshua Davies
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Cw85XH65V5nRwqFkJOdnxFj4W_E/
1436315
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Martin Rex
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/HO4KpZXpJ-tEblBCHvtxtAPk-gQ/
1436314
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Michael Staubermann
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/0SrihLGtdZW1U1krY20MGjywHkE/
1436313
1642005
Re: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwdRe: [TLS] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-tls-pwd
Dan Harkins
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Q7zVgiN7clQaIb3uGCoI2QzNGus/
1436312
1642012
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Geoffrey Keating
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/U9AQYP0EV87LVi37lzre6O1n3qo/
1436311
1642005
[TLS] Salsa vs. ChaCha[TLS] Salsa vs. ChaCha
Zooko Wilcox-OHearn
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/zKSRH9ED9hd7b8DKh-bZ05lG5aw/
1436310
1642002
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Watson Ladd
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/j4zqKsiTrILYqiKUoZofjSfozRc/
1436309
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Martin Rex
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/SxK1xmnEc4-gWaqUv7mBdQGVueU/
1436308
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Martin Rex
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/IT7JuIoniDbfGuJvU-ItMi7MFO0/
1436307
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Andrei Popov
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/335zufbqle3oPQYwMXt0VBFk1pY/
1436306
1642005
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:
Bodo Moeller
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/M1TtcuI24q9mvIar27LIvc-V7cE/
1436305
1642007
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Salz, Rich
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DjypQBsrWHj0MlKuglxpAqSy19c/
1436304
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Watson Ladd
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/u_d1G3-62SzUxl9TL3PwQvUxeso/
1436303
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Salz, Rich
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/-C9YCisG6LvigpT6ZAAFdbh-E4s/
1436302
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Watson Ladd
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/CI4OuH6SPCIk0meAtGEvetqJtBQ/
1436301
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Juho Vähä-Herttua
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/8JkYMpMO3H7x6lQqBfw2LhgrLa4/
1436300
1642005
40 Messages