Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Kemp, David P.
2009-12-30
tls
/arch/msg/tls/pdXs-83k0A8VI50wHFb04h1vvvA/
1431227
1642593
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Marsh Ray
2009-12-29
tls
/arch/msg/tls/NxJd3UCAXiH6LCQByakzx0Rm47I/
1431226
1642588
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-12-29
tls
/arch/msg/tls/EJ-hBjxeBmg8RHm96jKBftsPfiM/
1431225
1642588
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-29
tls
/arch/msg/tls/NFCwGX4UBpRbo0j4s9KI6-f4S7M/
1431224
1642588
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
tom.petch
2009-12-29
tls
/arch/msg/tls/uU52kFTJv5V6L-u3dgUA34YRoqA/
1431223
1642588
Re: [TLS] Updated draftRe: [TLS] Updated draft
tom.petch
2009-12-29
tls
/arch/msg/tls/phOW3AXk45AkPjqKAYVSaUzpvUc/
1431222
1642599
Re: [TLS] Summarizing identity change discussion so farRe: [TLS] Summarizing identity change discussion so far
Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
2009-12-28
tls
/arch/msg/tls/4OAuGuvsl-AAdhqTx9HiEBYwh7k/
1431221
1642608
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Ben Laurie
2009-12-28
tls
/arch/msg/tls/mwOaA1p9uiryzmKWKauQnHi7-cg/
1431220
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-12-28
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ARdDpOWaMPMtD3fNduq6oOu4-FY/
1431219
1642593
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Marsh Ray
2009-12-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/VaIpjsRovj4Sss6qpr2IcNgtw-c/
1431218
1642588
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-12-25
tls
/arch/msg/tls/qs5KfG7aM2IFxaUNuRysRMVcYYo/
1431217
1642588
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Marsh Ray
2009-12-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/hIapTDt24D19ItvhZs3c3gnunS0/
1431216
1642588
Re: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thingRe: [TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Y5GaZURgkvDouXWOq7gnoGnVBKI/
1431215
1642588
[TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing[TLS] Naming that TLS session/connection instance thing
Nelson B Bolyard
2009-12-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/nq1BCJzfFlCgtt7NLbROTaoRxWw/
1431214
1642588
Re: [TLS] Updated draftRe: [TLS] Updated draft
Marsh Ray
2009-12-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/m4E9IFe9CEhMTWQmS62jAc8sjwI/
1431213
1642599
Re: [TLS] Updated draftRe: [TLS] Updated draft
tom.petch
2009-12-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/I83eRt0bqVAcQRwf1qhQq8tKskg/
1431212
1642599
Re: [TLS] Updated draft - editorialRe: [TLS] Updated draft - editorial
tom.petch
2009-12-24
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Zekm3tOJtpYCVk6YRwfxCb9eKbI/
1431211
1642599
Re: [TLS] Summarizing identity change discussion so farRe: [TLS] Summarizing identity change discussion so far
Pasi.Eronen
2009-12-23
tls
/arch/msg/tls/FM1XChHipdChqXaXyO0zD7fbu5w/
1431210
1642608
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Kemp, David P.
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/4YQrUgTbUpwNeQE89zn1_1naJwg/
1431209
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Marsh Ray
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/2w73SjVDN5Uzo3YI5OkmL-qeHcg/
1431208
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Marsh Ray
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/5jIUxua71wvMEZ_Fztm1HGSECiY/
1431207
1642593
Re: [TLS] no_renegotiation alert and SSLV3Re: [TLS] no_renegotiation alert and SSLV3
Martin Rex
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/AwhOGVm0a7JqscwP-3tEzebn1iA/
1431206
1642589
Re: [TLS] no_renegotiation alert and SSLV3Re: [TLS] no_renegotiation alert and SSLV3
Martin Rex
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/LYzjTZ-2FUWOcNEAjd5VBTC5mPQ/
1431205
1642589
[TLS] no_renegotiation alert and SSLV3[TLS] no_renegotiation alert and SSLV3
Robert Dugal
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/KLp0-xcN5SpKD8FY_BTF-7bAhtY/
1431204
1642589
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Yoav Nir
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/F0BOD1VPpVwYq5W5wP2P1Kdxzs8/
1431203
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Yoav Nir
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/2WRIQAxS1WwLVOR_YO_rIE6sPfE/
1431202
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draftRe: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Updated draft
Blumenthal, Uri - 0662 - MITLL
2009-12-22
tls
/arch/msg/tls/E48iLxKyUvUsqNLag9wQciSI1zc/
1431201
1642593
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ElsEmnaUExv0ecGY0HPbkekoes0/
1431200
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/E0GTebORYmwmnu96u3XuJrBJuis/
1431199
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/MFFXtSgx4XMlRMQnBdW---jQG6E/
1431198
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/RpFSVe5QC8NZ-2_jgJIV48EH1xA/
1431197
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/UxxPVZg5ALr59jR6VzCTVYuz_TU/
1431196
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DiTOiP7NK37ucJOIw0ZoRXhIUgs/
1431195
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Geoffrey Keating
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/4zxsrZ8iBp2BVpSgyqI6cJNTfa8/
1431194
1642590
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/28P7UsVIezvbSsaybGs_6gEaA-4/
1431193
1642593
Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified - consensus?
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/kCEdaKnYytIvRcYodOXxtl8KQ9o/
1431192
1642593
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Michael D'Errico
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/QkkSFZna69hfbeOGySOg_X7fIl4/
1431191
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/zE9rVH4eAwU3St-JOEWZsL1CBnU/
1431190
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Marsh Ray
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/3u4vPnoa2nNGsguf9iShljnupdg/
1431189
1642590
Re: [TLS] Handshake not under protectionRe: [TLS] Handshake not under protection
Martin Rex
2009-12-21
tls
/arch/msg/tls/BxX9yPEK8XeqoIjBtXOf-mF5X2Q/
1431188
1642590
40 Messages