[TLS] Salsa vs. ChaCha[TLS] Salsa vs. ChaCha
Zooko Wilcox-OHearn
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/zKSRH9ED9hd7b8DKh-bZ05lG5aw/
1436310
1642002
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Watson Ladd
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/j4zqKsiTrILYqiKUoZofjSfozRc/
1436309
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Martin Rex
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/SxK1xmnEc4-gWaqUv7mBdQGVueU/
1436308
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Martin Rex
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/IT7JuIoniDbfGuJvU-ItMi7MFO0/
1436307
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Andrei Popov
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/335zufbqle3oPQYwMXt0VBFk1pY/
1436306
1642005
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:
Bodo Moeller
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/M1TtcuI24q9mvIar27LIvc-V7cE/
1436305
1642007
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Salz, Rich
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DjypQBsrWHj0MlKuglxpAqSy19c/
1436304
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Watson Ladd
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/u_d1G3-62SzUxl9TL3PwQvUxeso/
1436303
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Salz, Rich
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/-C9YCisG6LvigpT6ZAAFdbh-E4s/
1436302
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Watson Ladd
2013-11-18
tls
/arch/msg/tls/CI4OuH6SPCIk0meAtGEvetqJtBQ/
1436301
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Juho Vähä-Herttua
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/8JkYMpMO3H7x6lQqBfw2LhgrLa4/
1436300
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Kyle Hamilton
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/J8bDNwGNzRUBHn3GWkmZyFa0d5A/
1436299
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Mark Nottingham
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/X3DfDkJAw_-eMUU-9sQvRYgFJDA/
1436298
1642005
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/sG8o2Hn1WGLSKPAKxIo-KN54qmc/
1436297
1642003
Re: [TLS] This working group has failedRe: [TLS] This working group has failed
Salz, Rich
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/vAYt3Ym3O7y-C1GVEUA9CG3XMRg/
1436296
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Hannes Tschofenig
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/bRfXJYJGSkabEIj099J_X3sse0w/
1436295
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Yoav Nir
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/DQt6UOAEkp1lQTfDjJW5gePzzF8/
1436294
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Hannes Tschofenig
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/rvDD3JpcP_KUnmMNdndmiwGZ5po/
1436293
1642005
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Eric Rescorla
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/1EpuQyZOl_GbK9kcjUW8-j3j0Uw/
1436292
1642003
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Eric Rescorla
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/YVs5b8ruONy4WPg3uitAmpatHAE/
1436291
1642003
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Watson Ladd
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/LQuT691CbBRez50QzrMVD4oEuqo/
1436290
1642003
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Eric Rescorla
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/LuTxT_QL-L9a-jW-qemx-t6_Xdc/
1436289
1642003
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Watson Ladd
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/J_ESu8hXzD3Tcu-9IHMB7t1e-Vc/
1436288
1642003
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Geoffrey Keating
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Rf3Os6K7oST_bBUn4LD7OIcUN1g/
1436287
1642003
Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?Re: [TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/Ui-qQABnfAjz73pzHmStb6BIFyU/
1436286
1642003
[TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?[TLS] Should we support static RSA in TLS 1.3?
Eric Rescorla
2013-11-17
tls
/arch/msg/tls/9c_UpAAVnwgE0IcrcJYlb0cIZcE/
1436285
1642003
Re: [TLS] draft-agl-tls-chacha20poly1305-03Re: [TLS] draft-agl-tls-chacha20poly1305-03
Adam Langley
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/1lXdb6-2MF0NXIOJGr8gA2SiS0o/
1436284
1642004
[TLS] draft-agl-tls-chacha20poly1305-03[TLS] draft-agl-tls-chacha20poly1305-03
SM
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/AB0YsU4Ic2u2SQSZDkfszNAo3uE/
1436283
1642004
Re: [TLS] This working group has failedRe: [TLS] This working group has failed
Ralph Holz
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/ygRBrUUQ-cdpEzpwCqNVGjwgmVI/
1436282
1642005
Re: [TLS] This working group has failedRe: [TLS] This working group has failed
SM
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/CsZSBCaBI0S7e30aHBChUbUp2MY/
1436281
1642005
Re: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failedRe: [TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Taylor Hornby
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/5marQYa2uWY1ydsuTK5vmd-GXLw/
1436280
1642005
[TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed[TLS] Deployment ... Re: This working group has failed
Hannes Tschofenig
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/UToBwJ7qm_-OlbuRPb1eh9TpS3M/
1436279
1642005
[TLS] This working group has failed[TLS] This working group has failed
Watson Ladd
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/6JTvBCJcDKgFcdpAB5beoEbpqpQ/
1436278
1642005
Re: [TLS] Dear @tqbfRe: [TLS] Dear @tqbf
Bryan C. Geraghty
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/1I_vfDWGW3uHQmmj9ImfaQ259RY/
1436277
1642006
Re: [TLS] Dear @tqbfRe: [TLS] Dear @tqbf
Marsh Ray
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/agzVVZyubRMAQEgEK9i7Lk3B5YE/
1436276
1642006
Re: [TLS] Dear @tqbfRe: [TLS] Dear @tqbf
Patrick Mylund Nielsen
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/VH5yKlA3wbtuXjDD__aRMfaoCKc/
1436275
1642006
[TLS] Dear @tqbf[TLS] Dear @tqbf
Michael D'Errico
2013-11-16
tls
/arch/msg/tls/r7LI-63vxVyj_WSWuNSOdDXe2xQ/
1436274
1642006
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-MAC again (was Re: padding bug)Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-MAC again (was Re: padding bug)
Martin Rex
2013-11-15
tls
/arch/msg/tls/etS2vo9bFWG8qj_ap94vvqfWpyY/
1436273
1642093
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:
Marsh Ray
2013-11-15
tls
/arch/msg/tls/kDh7zZmyRVb9zzCSxvTuNeq22-Y/
1436272
1642007
Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:Re: [TLS] Encrypt-then-HMAC is the only credible choice. Here's why:
Robert Ransom
2013-11-15
tls
/arch/msg/tls/GVBMjefyMbUcnRkw-fwFF3xoedU/
1436271
1642007