Subject
From
Date
List
[Trans] Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)[Trans] Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Adam Eijdenberg
2015-12-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/mCHeZB8Tjd-RUYFsFW0pRt_0EFg/
2128393
1646523
Re: [Trans] Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)Re: [Trans] Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Florian M.
2016-11-04
trans
/arch/msg/trans/XcEsjC19PTx8A6yoGt-tK74M1t4/
2293757
1646523
Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Pierre Phaneuf
2016-11-04
trans
/arch/msg/trans/WEs1_kyRblV6RdN_sz_1vRu21Es/
2293530
1646523
Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Florian MAURY
2016-11-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rHI5956CYTyvqfRbDBAVgUIdS5g/
2293904
1646523
Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Paul Hadfield
2016-11-07
trans
/arch/msg/trans/o4owsKC7HqSvzbcEUYsk2UniLHg/
2294128
1646523
Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Rob Stradling
2016-11-07
trans
/arch/msg/trans/u7M7f4Xn2a45P1kHGFbUrFfd91A/
2294130
1646523
Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Eran Messeri
2016-11-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/4lwIcOXWEjOJ-YvwlFn6VxEhTWg/
2298445
1646523
[Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certs[Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certs
trans issue tracker
2015-12-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/BZ9oY8g68ko0H1SwOmfSDRFsbQA/
2127426
1646524
Re: [Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certsRe: [Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certs
trans issue tracker
2015-12-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/j_jIGOyFReI_jk-AOlI2Bs--gko/
2128395
1646524
Re: [Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certsRe: [Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certs
trans issue tracker
2015-12-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/xPu795v6xU7BImIC0VxqrUzwsYQ/
2128454
1646524
[Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers[Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2015-12-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/spaSEkgkOvLkm-iTmFeZVvjL5os/
2125560
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2015-12-24
trans
/arch/msg/trans/zokNcJro0LMY6dnb5FPyNFZ4Km8/
2133698
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2016-03-07
trans
/arch/msg/trans/nap4enN-st5lSve-Gbl6kWiyJhs/
2168193
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
Stephen Kent
2016-03-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/akg_ZezDxxxYNUlFDPcsJjGcw4E/
2171012
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
Rob Stradling
2016-03-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/F9_t1DUwdc-zuF8lTMuHT_Nlt0s/
2171254
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
Robin Wilton
2016-03-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/sGripk6xTtVwDhY2KYrv1ok8b9U/
2171299
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
Rob Stradling
2016-03-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/AFTNYfA5aIffCfXAyWmVV04E-Wg/
2171404
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
Melinda Shore
2016-03-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/U99wh1eweoG6JwWIIy6FW0AlVQg/
2171526
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2016-03-14
trans
/arch/msg/trans/K1eDMyiYB7C6OVR8n7NkMxcXnoE/
2172949
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2016-03-14
trans
/arch/msg/trans/HyNco8ejuaid3QeUVElOyglaidI/
2172950
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2016-03-14
trans
/arch/msg/trans/lu-j4GnNGDn9Ug2QrjUbMzqlI3U/
2172951
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2016-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/oXn7-rF4lR0sgVQdSghHMOFhNQg/
2174991
1646525
Re: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsersRe: [Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2016-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ESQAXQK9_754_VaScSPo2TrRrkE/
2175005
1646525
[Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met[Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met
trans issue tracker
2015-12-03
trans
/arch/msg/trans/RxbOipwwk_9MTlCHx6J1h39Sy5c/
2124171
1646526
Re: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be metRe: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met
trans issue tracker
2016-03-07
trans
/arch/msg/trans/oqvkD2_ZUrAYopzO4ip4TjroD6Y/
2168200
1646526
Re: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be metRe: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met
trans issue tracker
2016-03-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/xBBM8AugrpKThQo1MYptvoGNQbg/
2168770
1646526
Re: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be metRe: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met
trans issue tracker
2016-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/twoi4wvrCwep7WaqpgbyEtBRn7E/
2174990
1646526
Re: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be metRe: [Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met
trans issue tracker
2016-03-16
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rCMboyT0bzf4VkV315tjLA1QUBA/
2175003
1646526
[Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one place[Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one place
trans issue tracker
2015-12-03
trans
/arch/msg/trans/xGm696PUD7VHOCEQF8vXgwjYUL8/
2124165
1646527
Re: [Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one placeRe: [Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one place
trans issue tracker
2016-02-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/LoclcG_iuLhGUojTZUs0hA0chLk/
2152238
1646527
Re: [Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one placeRe: [Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one place
trans issue tracker
2016-02-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/1soLfG2cU1F9p2E9v1hLo7ONFGY/
2159923
1646527
[Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension[Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/FD8Dr5jVWtSKlmCDM7LLMBtAut8/
2123723
1646528
Re: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension
trans issue tracker
2016-02-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Q0nQGWp7z2lnWfOuklUh_KK891c/
2152196
1646528
Re: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension
trans issue tracker
2016-03-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Rbqmt2xRnaPhmeE6p716F3tr7EI/
2175864
1646528
Re: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension
trans issue tracker
2016-03-17
trans
/arch/msg/trans/mMfbt5owlFluZlSxvu37MsyqkXI/
2175880
1646528
Re: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension
trans issue tracker
2016-03-18
trans
/arch/msg/trans/veo4yKweJP7HUVK5RSyJaCwQoA0/
2177238
1646528
Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/HbO5iilAKGpXcbNujhAtTIcn20c/
2123698
1646529
Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/HdH5CWsa-NTqSXScJ4L_kKbtlqs/
2123699
1646529
Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?
trans issue tracker
2016-02-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/PCc4TRJx1ZbJtbR6-vG1Tnp0l1A/
2152212
1646529
Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?
trans issue tracker
2016-02-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/zn9SdeLKoy2i55VYJJJNI_VD2co/
2152237
1646529