[Trans] Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)[Trans] Certificate Transparency Mirrors (experimental)
Adam Eijdenberg
2015-12-11
trans
/arch/msg/trans/mCHeZB8Tjd-RUYFsFW0pRt_0EFg/
2128393
1646523
[Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certs[Trans] [trans] #146 (gossip): SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certs
trans issue tracker
2015-12-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/BZ9oY8g68ko0H1SwOmfSDRFsbQA/
2127426
1646524
Re: [Trans] [trans] #111 (rfc6962-bis): Consider using the cached-info TLS extensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #111 (rfc6962-bis): Consider using the cached-info TLS extension
trans issue tracker
2015-12-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/4tOeI7IuxKZCULnPN8YCSv1bkX4/
2127164
1646571
Re: [Trans] [trans] #130 (gossip): Support Delegation of SCT Feedback/STH PollinationRe: [Trans] [trans] #130 (gossip): Support Delegation of SCT Feedback/STH Pollination
Ben Laurie
2015-12-07
trans
/arch/msg/trans/E_QFPdYxJM179MNgGCkx1X_Rd_c/
2126122
1646549
[Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers[Trans] [trans] #145 (rfc6962-bis): Section 9.2 (TLS clients) needs more guidance for browsers
trans issue tracker
2015-12-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/spaSEkgkOvLkm-iTmFeZVvjL5os/
2125560
1646525
Re: [Trans] new I-DsRe: [Trans] new I-Ds
Dmitry Belyavsky
2015-12-04
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9HWLCMHJ00cT-pjw8-3rYsC0EUg/
2125026
1646539
Re: [Trans] new I-DsRe: [Trans] new I-Ds
David Mandelberg
2015-12-04
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ZkCpppLtZt9IY3q8Ssus5FIWXzM/
2124832
1646539
[Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met[Trans] [trans] #144 (rfc6962-bis): Need to specify how the CA requirements in 12.3 are to be met
trans issue tracker
2015-12-03
trans
/arch/msg/trans/RxbOipwwk_9MTlCHx6J1h39Sy5c/
2124171
1646526
[Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one place[Trans] [trans] #143 (rfc6962-bis): Putting TLS server guidance in one place
trans issue tracker
2015-12-03
trans
/arch/msg/trans/xGm696PUD7VHOCEQF8vXgwjYUL8/
2124165
1646527
[Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension[Trans] [trans] #142 (rfc6962-bis): Specify what TLS clients should send in the extension_data of the transparency_info TLS extension
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/FD8Dr5jVWtSKlmCDM7LLMBtAut8/
2123723
1646528
Re: [Trans] [trans] #141 (rfc6962-bis): expanding audit descriptionRe: [Trans] [trans] #141 (rfc6962-bis): expanding audit description
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/FVs5QE17wvEwRU9xYdaweoy8Fi0/
2123703
1646530
Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/HdH5CWsa-NTqSXScJ4L_kKbtlqs/
2123699
1646529
Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?Re: [Trans] [trans] #23 (rfc6962-bis): How can TLS clients match an SCT to a certificate?
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/HbO5iilAKGpXcbNujhAtTIcn20c/
2123698
1646529
Re: [Trans] [trans] #104 (rfc6962-bis): Add SCT Inclusion Proof extensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #104 (rfc6962-bis): Add SCT Inclusion Proof extension
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/K_n1J1_isrCtXvwk1aZkB8FEp-8/
2123695
1646604
Re: [Trans] [trans] #10 (rfc6962-bis): Permit Precertificate SCTs to be delivered via OCSP Stapling and the TLS ExtensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #10 (rfc6962-bis): Permit Precertificate SCTs to be delivered via OCSP Stapling and the TLS Extension
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/NpRb3XYjPkpvI-yblYiUNP9V_Mw/
2123693
1646747
Re: [Trans] [trans] #104 (rfc6962-bis): Add SCT Inclusion Proof extensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #104 (rfc6962-bis): Add SCT Inclusion Proof extension
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/kK9SPvYwaEg1Zkn_I4DVfn3OZP0/
2123689
1646604
Re: [Trans] [trans] #10 (rfc6962-bis): Permit Precertificate SCTs to be delivered via OCSP Stapling and the TLS ExtensionRe: [Trans] [trans] #10 (rfc6962-bis): Permit Precertificate SCTs to be delivered via OCSP Stapling and the TLS Extension
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/e5-PYFYT3l2DrdyyRMVjuHlHNHM/
2123688
1646747
[Trans] [trans] #141 (rfc6962-bis): expanding audit description[Trans] [trans] #141 (rfc6962-bis): expanding audit description
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/WQI_AOLc50YTR9QbPqLa_iLBJWU/
2123391
1646530
[Trans] [trans] #140 (rfc6962-bis): move section 8 to CA specification[Trans] [trans] #140 (rfc6962-bis): move section 8 to CA specification
trans issue tracker
2015-12-02
trans
/arch/msg/trans/AwjDXMX6tUgXTFN2tV4BYj_vnQM/
2123380
1646531
[Trans] [trans] #139 (rfc6962-bis): move text re: domain labels to CA specification[Trans] [trans] #139 (rfc6962-bis): move text re: domain labels to CA specification
trans issue tracker
2015-12-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/0NGDTlZE2yZ4p7r6Tr2KOl6vW1o/
2122740
1646532
[Trans] [trans] #138 (rfc6962-bis): use of term before defining it[Trans] [trans] #138 (rfc6962-bis): use of term before defining it
trans issue tracker
2015-12-01
trans
/arch/msg/trans/y1WRp6vkK4a5x_EvApWIEllTopM/
2122719
1646533
Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/hxh_EYmcD3cXLVesd7zIo-9Jhws/
2122518
1646554
Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/7O4cVN_0wwGpHZdbmDJRvpdNOWM/
2122517
1646554
Re: [Trans] [trans] #137 (rfc6962-bis): Section 13, an unlucky number?Re: [Trans] [trans] #137 (rfc6962-bis): Section 13, an unlucky number?
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/lAzIMFkB7o4tY_b-m6HZIzhMCto/
2122321
1646542
Re: [Trans] [trans] #117 (rfc6962-bis): log description as "untrusted"Re: [Trans] [trans] #117 (rfc6962-bis): log description as "untrusted"
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/iQByfDAusvRaVzz5394sFc_JP_U/
2122319
1646563
Re: [Trans] [trans] #128 (rfc6962-bis): section 5 over-claims the properties of an STHRe: [Trans] [trans] #128 (rfc6962-bis): section 5 over-claims the properties of an STH
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qpxih_P6Wo4-dhCSNcldqdwFnz0/
2122316
1646551
Re: [Trans] [trans] #135 (rfc6962-bis): Subjects (vs. Monitors) observing logs?Re: [Trans] [trans] #135 (rfc6962-bis): Subjects (vs. Monitors) observing logs?
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/OMQy7kg4z8_WYSZmku3eLAtlvFQ/
2122314
1646544
Re: [Trans] [trans] #128 (rfc6962-bis): section 5 over-claims the properties of an STHRe: [Trans] [trans] #128 (rfc6962-bis): section 5 over-claims the properties of an STH
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Nx62FSAy1yrmbVkOy9YnTfm5Qco/
2122217
1646551
Re: [Trans] [trans] #137 (rfc6962-bis): Section 13, an unlucky number?Re: [Trans] [trans] #137 (rfc6962-bis): Section 13, an unlucky number?
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/8ZSMoDxRqPFJpksbKBLZdHsR1Xw/
2122212
1646542
Re: [Trans] [trans] #137 (rfc6962-bis): Section 13, an unlucky number?Re: [Trans] [trans] #137 (rfc6962-bis): Section 13, an unlucky number?
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/tz1Xb0B-d8APu3-mNXdzL5l1S7U/
2122210
1646542
Re: [Trans] [trans] #117 (rfc6962-bis): log description as "untrusted"Re: [Trans] [trans] #117 (rfc6962-bis): log description as "untrusted"
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/t1UOBMyc0Q97LthJa36r40nBNm0/
2122208
1646563
Re: [Trans] [trans] #129 (rfc6962-bis): how do submitters determine what a log will accept?Re: [Trans] [trans] #129 (rfc6962-bis): how do submitters determine what a log will accept?
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/9c3O_iykIv432v7Ofy8NNJFIYU4/
2122203
1646550
Re: [Trans] [trans] #135 (rfc6962-bis): Subjects (vs. Monitors) observing logs?Re: [Trans] [trans] #135 (rfc6962-bis): Subjects (vs. Monitors) observing logs?
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/xPAIXbGr_28cSsXpNZAb0HnOxhY/
2122202
1646544
Re: [Trans] [trans] #128 (rfc6962-bis): section 5 over-claims the properties of an STHRe: [Trans] [trans] #128 (rfc6962-bis): section 5 over-claims the properties of an STH
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/IU2itxLeDJ9snHHJMAW3mFQIwO0/
2122194
1646551
Re: [Trans] [trans] #94 (rfc6962-bis): Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this?Re: [Trans] [trans] #94 (rfc6962-bis): Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this?
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/7aGoGZQJdk6u8cPqOSLrAZxLjss/
2122174
1646535
Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"
trans issue tracker
2015-11-30
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ZFNqUib7vad_ztn7vcAWXrCAChQ/
2122164
1646554
Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSARe: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA
trans issue tracker
2015-11-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ngOSKmd4gZO3wsg6BFMlklxj34A/
2121650
1646653
Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"Re: [Trans] [trans] #125 (rfc6962-bis): change "will return" to "MUST return"
trans issue tracker
2015-11-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/360kv264zZ69gFL2TNH2Syez070/
2121644
1646554
Re: [Trans] [trans] #136 (rfc6962-bis): inconsistent discussion of mis-issued certs and complianceRe: [Trans] [trans] #136 (rfc6962-bis): inconsistent discussion of mis-issued certs and compliance
trans issue tracker
2015-11-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/XUgHd_mRAGkkmn7Ib_YZhLcameY/
2121643
1646543
Re: [Trans] [trans] #93 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4Re: [Trans] [trans] #93 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4
trans issue tracker
2015-11-27
trans
/arch/msg/trans/LHwW5Yid6RbERPiXnU8emwfaCwY/
2121642
1646536