Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/slDhAuH3WW1AvX9wManfViWe4fg/
2390224
1702731
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA
trans issue tracker
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/DUy_4QfFko3iHaKbvqDhM8O9G88/
2390192
1702935
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Eran Messeri
2017-05-10
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Z761Yh3JwWfVMQYXFs1ZUIhuYPw/
2390187
1702731
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qUzImASh1AqAUWSbdnXqhmR0rMU/
2389864
1702731
Re: [Trans] Ticket 170Re: [Trans] Ticket 170
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/p6HbhiPS_8zW7KKLqLowxwjGDEc/
2389844
1702731
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/vuJTJ5o5ufMQxbjSaHiVcyIgHz0/
2389843
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Al Cutter
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/DQYeipmMvZdBezoXEvroN2dwrn4/
2389837
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Tom Ritter
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rkqB8dwxILTBJ79iOvcowjgNpgk/
2389804
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Eran Messeri
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/851tkezX8c78XX8q6qgksFlpw7g/
2389800
1702279
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/_pES1bhCxHuOihiyawNOO0fZi6w/
2389774
1702160
[Trans] Ticket 170[Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/rqmakAfYB9HnkffCDWi9r09Ic98/
2389773
1702731
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/U9QEfCa_op-t_3Ln_K5CK-lOz0A/
2389675
1702689
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/qSY7Wc8Zwp1tRHDqd_jF3pb259A/
2389657
1702689
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/f23FQacmFnzSJ9OXL9rKaxe-XdE/
2389647
1702647
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDsRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #187: Use IANA-managed OIDs
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Rmb2pD8_lkvuiXU6f8hlrLF2i-4/
2389629
1701969
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/dYXstgzbLF7e5sSaI3VDrtlTuyo/
2389596
1702647
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/dM6_Lpnjw53ViM43QBCU2IA8Fdo/
2389585
1702160
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/2sCsL7D0REh4xm7gcyg1dnloX4A/
2389555
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/eAmPSWdNtD1DGpvOGVAEe2Hu3ck/
2389554
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-09
trans
/arch/msg/trans/a0THR1hpjhuoOBiGue5pPZHFV3w/
2389532
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storingRe: [Trans] What logs are storing
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/ISlpUaNY0lQCEicMAPnoebTAG60/
2389401
1702279
Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)Re: [Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/WJDaxNQS_CghnIyHjpDVpYjSOoY/
2389397
1702279
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/kD59qckPc27kw4Rgtcd9LipXShU/
2389395
1702158
[Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)[Trans] What logs are storing (was: The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad)
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/IiiYHeqdIH3BQrPu5F9__QpiUpc/
2389393
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Linus Nordberg
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/nZvgFulyWT3XR3NQM8D8X0NE7JM/
2389390
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Andrew Ayer
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/U9AAs0aXJ1opBQypt1SM31XWdgo/
2389273
1702279
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Tom Ritter
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/o1BALNgKscH0wB7Pz9_NLAO6VEA/
2389254
1702279
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree sectionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #182: Clarify notation in the Merkle tree section
trans issue tracker
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/XxJroliOHUNvZdlPDLF46fpswlE/
2389228
1702160
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #181: Consolidate "Add Chain" and "Add PreCertChain" endpointsRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #181: Consolidate "Add Chain" and "Add PreCertChain" endpoints
trans issue tracker
2017-05-08
trans
/arch/msg/trans/I1tnVPztnaamK27M17nReQ8Cf8E/
2389140
1702130
Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)Re: [Trans] Providing the history of STHs a log has issued (in 6962-bis)
Brian Smith
2017-05-06
trans
/arch/msg/trans/R7922JfjBhhhbx8alvrz3H69naQ/
2388808
1702158
Re: [Trans] Ticket 179 - moving Cert/Precert indicator into the data structureRe: [Trans] Ticket 179 - moving Cert/Precert indicator into the data structure
Rob Stradling
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/SaxaFuPGV2BobZbDJ43nNU5uUW0/
2388774
1702002
Re: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is badRe: [Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Rob Stradling
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/Z5aeOqnzqyPkExYNN3RZyBwja5M/
2388768
1702279
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #186: Add a registry for error codesRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #186: Add a registry for error codes
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/RkFWPnF6Os1bMzAFMYjh6LppJhs/
2388764
1702401
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #166: State the log parameters in the section that defines a logRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #166: State the log parameters in the section that defines a log
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/m4T8Jagp7tYfv4xtXAX2h_Y_3J8/
2388763
1702400
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/1OfnNK2i3hHrJ0MG91nxKpjXFSI/
2388762
1702148
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #185: Don't violate BCP 190
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/A4EIRUxrOFHqCLyPXnq3SplzW0s/
2388761
1702148
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #183: Don't violate the TLS Feature extension definitionRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #183: Don't violate the TLS Feature extension definition
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/HfDNbTrdnaksXGTMHJAgZfTU1Dw/
2388760
1702399
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #180: Consolidate all Merkle tree data formats and computationsRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #180: Consolidate all Merkle tree data formats and computations
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/eM3EnIrJAov8IBY5y8LW5ydOFZg/
2388759
1702173
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #173: De-duplicate Extension typesRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #173: De-duplicate Extension types
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/tg3IzPk6ZUmXHM4tuc4JKRZX-ng/
2388758
1702398
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #172: Pick one structure for multiple TransItemsRe: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #172: Pick one structure for multiple TransItems
trans issue tracker
2017-05-05
trans
/arch/msg/trans/SzXg-lth2tWsH7_CBAJHUZzDvbg/
2388757
1702397