Subject
From
Date
List
[tsvwg] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/XPcey4j_480dkgITNA7x17F_qEg/
3485187
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
2024-07-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/O1eQO0TXdFraqadQHwPB9MZrpJg/
3485377
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Greg White
2024-07-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/YtzkFOZc2BuPmg49rntRm0RcbKY/
3485548
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/815qSeH1T1zmeBok_CBrYUEJcRk/
3485795
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DY48teiFSVpMLQTyyWrkYOoqASY/
3485803
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ULAzoeHxj5biTUi99CdG9IqST1I/
3485588
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/mnvKaLTWeanJXNrkybsEW0l20Qc/
3485810
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/id76aPidGb6bts5ZSoqQeec07A0/
3485817
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/fXc0kgq3oHkC88jNs6dODylA-JM/
3485884
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/aDrZEseSO8Prqsx0nL2RJ3mOXcY/
3485896
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/t0AS50J78bBOPtYuOYueDCLMC6A/
3485930
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/zxCwKhu9QvmRVgdDc-jM2WsqoeY/
3485970
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Greg White
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/kDJ95yRctSn-s5r0u6s8omLuoNM/
3485940
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DlTKi2VDa9A2K4lfH6f9gnt-NDQ/
3485977
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Greg White
2024-07-25
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/y9THTF6Kxbq5zXWgfkFJeMofX4w/
3486653
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Jonathan Morton
2024-07-25
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Cj2qOpedEigp-U1jOB3N5dMbDgg/
3486759
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-25
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/m3_b67ZQiv_lN3a_nH2tC0tTt6s/
3486885
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-26
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/2jZN16YOo9ANBYVR3dKB4agrMaY/
3487194
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/6Smby5PXs3MMVKa7YJHBrr_SliY/
3485998
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/2jym_H9E0j2YBCk2PRU1y1PsqvM/
3486143
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/EKr_IiUueMdAayDkyBzn-UlCd6M/
3486170
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/_c01OPhHN075WQtPPGWPLW6lRgg/
3485694
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/n3yI1RRMfBVL0oosESqyyVb5Zn4/
3485743
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/zhwhUgqLoTiTlgv-qfnlR7K9chw/
3485785
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/aQ3lZ4wHOwhKRZ-vrJRz7tTJgig/
3485798
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/PsxkQPys4nvj1uwj6aGVq9WRZWc/
3485814
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/VEbebpwkEPJLrJNZunf3elyRnDo/
3486003
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/5l6fwTfRaf6RmcZTLCFDuEEQJOs/
3485889
2144431
[tsvwg] Sea wind[tsvwg] Sea wind
Michael Welzl
2024-07-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/O5gDGFqOTf4RjVkvZPOunTkR6oo/
3484979
2144359
[tsvwg] Protocol Action: 'Zero Checksum for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-11.txt)[tsvwg] Protocol Action: 'Zero Checksum for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-zero-checksum-11.txt)
The IESG
2024-07-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/q5HesSuL0EcgwWe9_KQOySMQJuc/
3484965
2144347
[tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG[tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
IETF Secretariat
2024-07-21
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/725e-rvzOMAQuUdZdQqxZaZ9nLo/
3484243
2144003
[tsvwg] [side meeting] IETF 120 - High Performance WAN(HP-WAN)[tsvwg] [side meeting] IETF 120 - High Performance WAN(HP-WAN)
Yao Kehan
2024-07-19
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/LRocXfUUcfesJp6XA29XEdp3K8s/
3483544
2143696
[tsvwg] Re: [side meeting] IETF 120 - High Performance WAN(HP-WAN)[tsvwg] Re: [side meeting] IETF 120 - High Performance WAN(HP-WAN)
xiong.quan
2024-08-19
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/y4v1oUdyLRuQeqc00WcxALYx1O0/
3494863
2143696
[tsvwg] 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
mohamed.boucadair
2024-07-18
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/sP0ysaLasJyKvp3-GBZYysiKc3w/
3483264
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Black, David
2024-07-19
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/MjNZcLkNZFIQwhp1BAL6g3OSDQU/
3483592
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
mohamed.boucadair
2024-07-19
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/wiU02v6sg6zFucSLXK72jPClA0A/
3483609
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Gorry Fairhurst
2024-07-19
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/JXmr8tVsweCRtdbAIuMJpCIM164/
3483765
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
2024-07-21
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/uC-G1alyesM7-QC1F3h2UdAYNws/
3483989
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Black, David
2024-07-22
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/c49wJuyN6jKE27ISEjHcs20kkEc/
3484774
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: [Teas] IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Subir Das
2024-07-22
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/JB8ARbstNUAm84e9yoN7DwxVjvQ/
3484850
2143624