[tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for Experiments[tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for Experiments
Scharf, Michael
2024-08-06
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Lfot9F7yj5fiHG4NeHEgdsMK2Cw/
3490908
2146403
[tsvwg] Resolving UDP Options Issue #52[tsvwg] Resolving UDP Options Issue #52
C. M. Heard
2024-08-05
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/YHqTpgGysV2nnxYltQQ9Gi5Nsrw/
3490700
2127509
[tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for Experiments[tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for Experiments
C. M. Heard
2024-08-05
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/NQkhNrvEgt7KP8v74QBf68vDEnQ/
3490555
2146403
[tsvwg] support last call for User Ports for Experiments[tsvwg] support last call for User Ports for Experiments
Wesley Eddy
2024-08-05
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/OrHvAx1CeGZhj7A4GY9WfhYkjwU/
3490525
2146403
[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot
2024-08-04
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Gk27jJEXUuFBwaTx3HQfbeuAOiY/
3490229
2146268
[tsvwg] Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-23[tsvwg] Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-23
Benson Muite
2024-08-02
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/028DDcWn-A_22YDeQ1Disp5Tidk/
3489784
2139726
[tsvwg] Re: NQB draft WGLC - incentives, security and traffic protection[tsvwg] Re: NQB draft WGLC - incentives, security and traffic protection
Black, David
2024-07-29
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DbnuKIQBgZZYXcfKAI1dI-ggwH0/
3488159
2137737
[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot
2024-07-28
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/gyBHgSHIrtc0ImihBAFehm1g8D8/
3487793
2145350
[tsvwg] On the proposal for 4895bis (SCTP-AUTH)[tsvwg] On the proposal for 4895bis (SCTP-AUTH)
Magnus Westerlund
2024-07-26
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/--AKAxlKyJ_M2dkw4o1W1_9qLHQ/
3487349
2145189
[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp-02.txt[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp-02.txt
internet-drafts
2024-07-26
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Asoh9Gj8IUe3HeuiT7y1eoY5Z7I/
3487237
2145157
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-26
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/2jZN16YOo9ANBYVR3dKB4agrMaY/
3487194
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: NQB draft WGLC - incentives, security and traffic protection[tsvwg] Re: NQB draft WGLC - incentives, security and traffic protection
Black, David
2024-07-25
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/RDmd5rtUqoBqrU-V-xmLqtJTSyI/
3486915
2137737
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-25
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/m3_b67ZQiv_lN3a_nH2tC0tTt6s/
3486885
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Jonathan Morton
2024-07-25
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Cj2qOpedEigp-U1jOB3N5dMbDgg/
3486759
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Greg White
2024-07-25
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/y9THTF6Kxbq5zXWgfkFJeMofX4w/
3486653
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ciBY4S6X-u5jBZj6WT-KOKvXEQo/
3486254
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/EKr_IiUueMdAayDkyBzn-UlCd6M/
3486170
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-23[tsvwg] Re: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-23
Greg White
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ELs0lpF7Undjr08fyRObb5qEjdA/
3486154
2139726
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/2jym_H9E0j2YBCk2PRU1y1PsqvM/
3486143
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/VEbebpwkEPJLrJNZunf3elyRnDo/
3486003
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/6Smby5PXs3MMVKa7YJHBrr_SliY/
3485998
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DlTKi2VDa9A2K4lfH6f9gnt-NDQ/
3485977
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/zxCwKhu9QvmRVgdDc-jM2WsqoeY/
3485970
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Greg White
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/kDJ95yRctSn-s5r0u6s8omLuoNM/
3485940
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/t0AS50J78bBOPtYuOYueDCLMC6A/
3485930
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/aDrZEseSO8Prqsx0nL2RJ3mOXcY/
3485896
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/5l6fwTfRaf6RmcZTLCFDuEEQJOs/
3485889
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics[tsvwg] Re: [Teas] Re: Re: 5QI to DiffServ DSCP Mapping for Slicing (was TR: IETF 120 - TEAS WG - Session Logistics
Vishnu Pavan Beeram
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/35cGG_LCYysrubZy8ldiXFDhTU0/
3485883
2143624
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/fXc0kgq3oHkC88jNs6dODylA-JM/
3485884
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/id76aPidGb6bts5ZSoqQeec07A0/
3485817
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/PsxkQPys4nvj1uwj6aGVq9WRZWc/
3485814
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/mnvKaLTWeanJXNrkybsEW0l20Qc/
3485810
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DY48teiFSVpMLQTyyWrkYOoqASY/
3485803
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Livingood, Jason
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/aQ3lZ4wHOwhKRZ-vrJRz7tTJgig/
3485798
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/815qSeH1T1zmeBok_CBrYUEJcRk/
3485795
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/zhwhUgqLoTiTlgv-qfnlR7K9chw/
3485785
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta)
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/n3yI1RRMfBVL0oosESqyyVb5Zn4/
3485743
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Sebastian Moeller
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/_c01OPhHN075WQtPPGWPLW6lRgg/
3485694
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Black, David
2024-07-24
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ULAzoeHxj5biTUi99CdG9IqST1I/
3485588
2144431
[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)[tsvwg] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gwhiteCL/NQBdraft] Should traffic protection be mandatory to implement? (Issue #48)
Greg White
2024-07-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/YtzkFOZc2BuPmg49rntRm0RcbKY/
3485548
2144431