Subject
From
Date
List
[tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?[tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/bPN5ryfKHN1VsrAfO7jq-cvrCbY/
3007247
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Neal Cardwell
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/spczSBAMAI8z_DCpxlgMWhhADQ4/
3007271
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Ian Swett
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Y5Zf4i2GlXWUF1_kxDlWw8lcq14/
3007278
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/NL6txokiNbSWuDu4SWI7ha2uu5M/
3007835
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/TG1Z-tt4OBTl9F3wXZT7gKwy3rY/
3007838
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Ian Swett
2021-03-10
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/u60lu5s1wk9hKQx11oSYI5vHXGA/
3007947
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Lloyd W
2021-03-18
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/8Zi3777w959rxu0pBJn78cocmsc/
3011675
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Jonathan Morton
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/ipqb6B4GxNPWrpaB6SLzE0T_As4/
3007421
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-10
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/sLnntBjYgQ-OsxB5lNqesqi_56s/
3008000
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-10
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/nvoNVFLuH38IblfrgfiaHihDaAE/
3008142
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-10
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/150NplXjZ_rKvWN0oHrVk9F2sNg/
3008191
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?Re: [tsvwg] A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?
Bob Briscoe
2021-05-05
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/n6vXWm5SdROU7OzxMzkcFuX-ujI/
3030585
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-16
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/kBQ6Wj291kMDiQ4kWRqAEt3yXcE/
3010530
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Gorry Fairhurst
2021-03-16
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Dx10BBwjJMgQlN1MnDE26Hv0pVY/
3010565
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-22
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Qwjc9jP5KbQa7t6NLaRdUAldvWw/
3012743
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Martin Duke
2021-03-26
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/mb7rmJ6kAlC7qT5A2FLtAynAgJo/
3014785
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-29
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/_yJaLqwYjNhVBJEZ2ACTA3MoxQI/
3015254
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-29
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/7DO9mnuI8pdkn2u8kZB9x8CTsfg/
3015315
1943069
Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]Re: [tsvwg] What TCP to target in TCP-friendly [was:A word for "does not have a significantly negative impact on traffic using standard congestion control"?]
Gorry Fairhurst
2021-03-29
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/3SB12XP8L7DTBnEfTX6iKLEW1Ps/
3015345
1943069
[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-14.txt[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-14.txt
internet-drafts
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/t7wuCx1va2PIdkv0vjsCniZ1z_Y/
3007224
1943061
[tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG[tsvwg] Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
IETF Secretariat
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/k4ruEo3JdWYKKfPAqO_pFAKNkc0/
3007045
1942967
[tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WG[tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
Black, David
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/elPbNvyiLSdm8xGUEjLkvnopGX0/
3007096
1942967
Re: [tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WGRe: [tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/7OQPP8FFvOd9sXo3dQaS9ebTFPs/
3007126
1942967
Re: [tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WGRe: [tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
Black, David
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/dS380sMljKZfT571-Krod2MFcIE/
3007538
1942967
Re: [tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WGRe: [tsvwg] FW: Milestones changed for tsvwg WG
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-10
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/YcwWuz3VSRqzNll_NN1fu9J8Lhw/
3008478
1942967
Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-20.txtRe: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-20.txt
Gorry Fairhurst
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/o0_K0eIYqGkPjj4cSgpu6BB-RiY/
3006993
1942938
[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-20.txt[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-20.txt
internet-drafts
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/sAoIjW5k4tdavTyPjGEWpDHX8rQ/
3006992
1942937
[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-10.txt[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-10.txt
internet-drafts
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/7jkcIHRucopC9c6bOfAxObXcgDA/
3006927
1942900
[tsvwg] Finding the TSVWG meeting[tsvwg] Finding the TSVWG meeting
Black, David
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/jhNNuh40xZ4LfA1vfMpD6uCMcl4/
3006884
1942887
[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-15.txt[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-15.txt
internet-drafts
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/rvrffPhacBQrIE9hSN0RjzSnETA/
3006724
1942793
[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-13.txt[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-13.txt
internet-drafts
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/VOoyJ71r1nfVISK6y9PS-IoZvDk/
3006714
1942787
[tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt[tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Pete Heist
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/Gwr-40Vm-3iw_Vvg9LXAXsKaCd8/
3006643
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Pete Heist
2021-03-08
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/1z37frgp1Z4JUocuQLgytms19gY/
3007125
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/eoKcAs4_NmXzePqKCAZPseFcdxg/
3007211
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Pete Heist
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/QJGFjx8_lDzcZz9Ucj_7h_plDog/
3007241
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Bob Briscoe
2021-03-22
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/DJXv2FkOBpRMnnKD7tI8M-j1oL0/
3012821
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Pete Heist
2021-03-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/awI8wHEtNteLqaD2FpplV_cg65k/
3013093
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Jonathan Morton
2021-03-23
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/OoVWztvM8CT2M4_2Ji30a4JjQb0/
3013097
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Sebastian Moeller
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/xMYvop5m-35MgSiGWjwcpldjPJc/
3007461
1942759
Re: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txtRe: [tsvwg] New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.txt
Pete Heist
2021-03-09
tsvwg
/arch/msg/tsvwg/FYt2B1OuiW14X7beoX5mcjoSdT0/
3007501
1942759
57 Messages