Subject
From
Date
List
[v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.[v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/117WAEFkewhfACWH5ATX3e4zaEc/
1487209
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5gBjsFNCRrWEgEOlGFqvk0MqXvs/
1487210
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/huccpp1DH1Rh3wp5SvXMFGN2CYw/
1487216
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/iuTVFNlghmBW32ABuRp6knomcE4/
1487224
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/KLYVmShy2tmig_uD2MlAzwFrstA/
1487229
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Joel jaeggli
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5vckL9TMwNqn9gsH9RoNOplzFn0/
1487230
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/KaYiN41RBD2_HZSLS4hB_nsuVZM/
1487232
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/s7CSs9hLgFEJ2DxFAq-BBIBqVqM/
1487253
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/y7C-p5wkrnkC4-9ZRvZvX6lhjzI/
1487255
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/sfnSbWmuCqxwdxR8tIHUptTNpgA/
1487257
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/CeukKmlxkBjzFSiDzxQIZ16y7yk/
1487258
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/sF_qKTuEkV1_y0Vi-C5FANtQ1zE/
1487272
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
2012-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/sTd9G1WQsoM105Lc4ggBv65DVbY/
1487277
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Qaa8V7zJOLhTgSJr3qRGvNXCCGQ/
1487278
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
2012-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yHQBE2DQbEEjKy6bEsLllqwqHrU/
1487285
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/hm_IDGgGIQrnsc1JB0D9vA7ev8I/
1487286
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not tobe an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Washam Fan
2012-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/VETtqkVE8ZQlxjukce9WQAnR9Kk/
1487308
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-22
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xDhqeDt-JtmAF1uF12NvgKXht0Q/
1487291
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/J-O9hjcDusriMleqV7ybW-DoO0s/
1487304
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-23
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yr7UKB1Rc2MUV6BfJZUeGaasNpY/
1487313
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Joel jaeggli
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/fM3Wiq6JafbjdaAEsi13D0Dgi0Q/
1487211
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Brian E Carpenter
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yQG8A9SekQyG-nsbGvz5-4QLe7Q/
1487212
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Victor Kuarsingh
2012-02-19
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/by-xcT4HbsMjp26mE-F8cdliRHY/
1487213
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/-bK4gnoqJzhnQlTz3LydOQTfaao/
1487215
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Brian E Carpenter
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/bEW69vq0VG_I6UMfZfJgtnhSTq8/
1487235
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/S8fsK_Q_LHOsIYzkJ4nBKgbe158/
1487243
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/dKaPvAK1q9matRHhwqg9N7RqZSQ/
1487244
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Cx0mHFV-jzhFPsAssN5_Pyn70FY/
1487246
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Satoru Matsushima
2012-02-21
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mxpz0lFWzEZ1zezvuHTe0GglUyQ/
1487247
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Wojciech Dec
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/_Xhwc2xQm_dZ6ShMpgvONL-xDCo/
1487219
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/exypnunF0lpuSsjOPb9DMU7CQww/
1487220
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/br3ebNpsSt8ISxXHCBvwXsFP1o4/
1487225
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Wojciech Dec
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/wnnjDmr5mjx6u3_2Ycs7yiWcbiQ/
1487228
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Rémi Després
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/DrFQeWDqkGzFhk63Nn3v2b3tQLU/
1487218
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
tsavo.stds@gmail.com
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/EZFsBUY6kQLJxVOuiWYLufzyD8I/
1487217
1660441
Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.Re: [v6ops] draft-464XLAT not a "trial deployment report" - not to be an ietf-v6ops I.D.
Cameron Byrne
2012-02-20
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4whYmsDxiN6_HJyolF_SJ4AFOyc/
1487227
1660441
[v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis[v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis
Teemu Savolainen
2012-02-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/bdqn1JKUdsLv7NzdqEoyHVfqmWM/
1487206
1660442
Re: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bisRe: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis
Vízdal Aleš
2012-02-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/5VXG-6fGmhLjUvpKJY3Mk3eQD1c/
1487207
1660442
Re: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be includedinto 6204bisRe: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be includedinto 6204bis
Hemant Singh (shemant)
2012-02-17
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/he-Pijt36XoVjy7TR0d4a471suk/
1487208
1660442
Re: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bisRe: [v6ops] PD-exclude was approved by the IESG -> should be included into 6204bis
STARK, BARBARA H
2012-02-24
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/gTWoVL_iLVHpKZAz5a7D7gXEu8c/
1487339
1660442
43 Messages