[v6ops] Re: Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Re: Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Timothy Winters
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xciC10TcWoj8JhiaZGcVSOsemCI/
3491393
2146589
[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Timothy Winters
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/dnOq6kzMvyKCeacn5awKcEJPrwA/
3491385
2146589
[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Timothy Winters
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/eEaHaqcuHUpWIXEpntZHPUj2Y5s/
3491372
2146589
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd>[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd>
Timothy Winters
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/tNB1v2uz--v0e67Zb5Pw7APFJ8E/
3491263
2142645
[v6ops] Re: Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Re: Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Tim Chown
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/VHDL3ZNb8dSp1xA6TrE1dPwY7kQ/
3491224
2146589
[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Vasilenko Eduard
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mmIRRxGktpe3d-TUXGzwR7Q7SS0/
3491185
2146589
[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops
Paolo Volpato
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/cwjNkqZu2hfeYb5Z0VwNVFyRMuc/
3491173
2146400
[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops
Mark Smith
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/LCDmkWr1n2ls4Dro8_bSqU9cSlY/
3491148
2146400
[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
David Farmer
2024-08-07
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/YIGBNTO1fgIjPy26E90TcbNCRxM/
3491143
2146589
[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops
Kawashima Masanobu(川島 正伸)
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/kroCUhnJGAtnDU3Tvg8rs_EBSPk/
3491128
2146400
[v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environment[v6ops] Re: DHCPv6 PD in a multi-prefix environment
David Farmer
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/TncQGN4xLqFW3bvmnq9aE-ZAMrY/
3491106
2144615
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd>[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: <draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd>
David Farmer
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/4-98LXV8gSfVOfTZByKP37OSGt8/
3491105
2142645
[v6ops] Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Correction: Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Brian E Carpenter
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Rm9CUhaspYXAPzA1V9pUjcPD438/
3491092
2146589
[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Brian E Carpenter
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/Dm58RVH9_eyPRJHUSW0sd1BDY00/
3491090
2146589
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Daryll Swer
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/7fh6BOuv6629F76JKmZrPfZVlL8/
3490993
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Timothy Winters
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/YkXPmB8wUypto3JZm4KwQq6PGa8/
3490989
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Daryll Swer
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/mNBO38iBvzsBdLrtxLK19vZKYKg/
3490979
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Ted Lemon
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/kqGedBTDi4dZNKmMKsH292Za6Fw/
3490972
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Daryll Swer
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/gjMGxECkIs3JHPRxgrXg8zOq6WU/
3490970
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Ted Lemon
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/WR_5lFWPuGq3QiMcO4bbqjoNXI4/
3490971
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Daryll Swer
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/enXHBBmpKdcjyL1JsHzMOn151YI/
3490968
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Timothy Winters
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yJRnmikF9ajsnhFt_CH_5Yns10c/
3490944
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Ted Lemon
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/GGAKsY-n4yDoKe9EVc1DwUkfuRk/
3490943
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Timothy Winters
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/dlKOkDXEjsHNOz2KUqVAcQ2Lt3M/
3490941
2146440
[v6ops] Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd[v6ops] Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd
Nick Buraglio
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/9jtza7XPgG0bwJ5kA-naJlgV8bQ/
3490939
2146589
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Ted Lemon
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/BeZPzGW6xrG26uczSRpsAtX39p4/
3490932
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Michael Breuer
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/0bN_e56_hOWs2bu-DI9UxFSd_pg/
3490907
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Timothy Winters
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/eZ6cfk_VV1KYOP7lQPyeqY4uNwI/
3490904
2146440
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Timothy Winters
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/giazschhSanH455qGsR--jTkkRQ/
3490903
2146440
[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops
Xipengxiao
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/aq0S9HieBlGPC9I4umCxx_tJFMw/
3490881
2146400
[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops
Vasilenko Eduard
2024-08-06
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/7fL87N2NBZYLnMYNAyWTL4zLmjI/
3490837
2146400
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Daryll Swer
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/xqZgzHh6H3nL8Tc8dJfSzxP-L-4/
3490733
2146440
[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops
Brian E Carpenter
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/G3on7SgS0pZ3aZISRnfGiU7rzrU/
3490699
2146400
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Michael Breuer
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/3sdkxKwondFIuOx8IngYsBTqzig/
3490696
2146440
[v6ops] Re: Fwd: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-cc-v6ops-wlcg-flow-label-marking in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"[v6ops] Re: Fwd: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-cc-v6ops-wlcg-flow-label-marking in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
David Farmer
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/kA7bV3gs4a166p7VnDgaNGLaGGI/
3490656
2141737
[v6ops] Fwd: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-cc-v6ops-wlcg-flow-label-marking in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"[v6ops] Fwd: The V6OPS WG has placed draft-cc-v6ops-wlcg-flow-label-marking in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Nick Buraglio
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/kSlpqiEngLuf1MOVLspXYiDBy2s/
3490645
2141737
[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)[v6ops] Re: [IPv6]Re: Is the P flag even necessary? M flag already does enough (Re: Re: A detail review of draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-04)
Ted Lemon
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/0ygL5aZ6xyhVl3gNxweRo63XVCc/
3490642
2146440
[v6ops] The V6OPS WG has placed draft-link-v6ops-6mops in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"[v6ops] The V6OPS WG has placed draft-link-v6ops-6mops in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
IETF Secretariat
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/XfJyYwXRQ7NmtT5P7ncUaZbGNXM/
3490589
2146426
[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops[v6ops] Re: Call For Adoption: draft-link-v6ops-6mops
Jen Linkova
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/ChU2RnL4agRu2e6Ktzb6R7YOm2I/
3490533
2146400
[v6ops] Re: ESnet celebrates 25 years of production IPv6 *today*[v6ops] Re: ESnet celebrates 25 years of production IPv6 *today*
Nick Buraglio
2024-08-05
v6ops
/arch/msg/v6ops/yny09_q8f9gb-FHkPPujW9KOe9k/
3490520
2146204