Re: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logicRe: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logic
Alexandre Petrescu
2022-12-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/kaFHpJB-VhHfIPZDqCIoajZOiwA/
3254424
2040257
Re: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logicRe: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logic
Esko Dijk
2022-12-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/Ck_VK3rDFi1npPHTAySsUylDLVc/
3254356
2040257
Re: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logicRe: [v6ops] Updating RFC 7084 - alternate logic
Alexandre Petrescu
2022-12-01
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/jzMsAJnYL959jjDxdO1-ISVlN64/
3253233
2040257
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-24
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/sYQDawMcWlMvqFW5anzMG4Uvl-k/
2967892
1927049
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Erik Kline
2020-11-24
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/zkvo1e88_XvO4WQsCz2_9o83aCs/
2967765
1927049
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-23
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/7XOPQrr9E8zOTFnZdwQsfPJ-ld0/
2967546
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Vasilenko Eduard
2020-11-23
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/MK4dwMADmj0Jse-wqchFo3Maoys/
2967347
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-23
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/c79fP7y5YqZtGRbsHC1QjcCq16g/
2967312
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-23
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/oop2a6e3wW8qq2Clo8gHV-qQBTw/
2967309
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-22
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/Us5ibNHOIdExQI2M-S07U8P9a7c/
2967207
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Gyan Mishra
2020-11-22
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/zSvv5yvpzFxmNHdhE3qjrL1HamA/
2967199
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/uuMpVema6dKD_Yjfqr4m0zYifgI/
2967113
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/qd2w0To2HjjqZu2zpbTwxz88REo/
2967070
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/AXVtVsvjLfvHMuyDAgSnWcuwL5I/
2967067
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/7Ej3zXkymOpJyNsiYlhfpRXuB1g/
2967061
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/YFUFPe2inxKoX0NtLGu34bbVEiI/
2967059
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Ca By
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/K_Y7wZ20Plg5cz-L1zi4YBRataE/
2967034
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/-RxB_LZljF0stq4fBbsCi4ymc9c/
2967031
1926578
Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]Re: [v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Mark Smith
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/L-qYdz_htyEY2KD8UdZaSST6vbc/
2967018
1926578
[v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112][v6ops] Next step? [Re: The bottom is /112]
Brian E Carpenter
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/m2G0yQpoLFsfM95_b9WGUp3N0pw/
2967015
1926578
Re: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops presoRe: [v6ops] The bottom is /112 (was: RE: Extending a /64) -- How about new fixed bottom /80 win-win for all - epiphany at 6:54am after v6ops preso
Joel M. Halpern
2020-11-21
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/ta7-CYAiHwP4Gs0dgkwao9NRrFE/
2967010
1926578
Re: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txtRe: [v6ops] [E] New Version Notification for draft-mishra-v6ops-variable-slaac-problem-stmt-01.txt
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/sWVm4Zg0xTmV8kg40utC2VYOiFE/
2960030
1923425
Re: [v6ops] Implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and NDRe: [v6ops] Implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND
Alexandre Petrescu
2019-10-30
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/2cSgHNOdbT82sql3ketNydLM_KE/
2797669
1858097
Re: [v6ops] Implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and NDRe: [v6ops] Implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND
Li HUANG
2019-10-30
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/bGIRyOHTKS_LYKMn0sKoCReSoiU/
2797662
1858097
Re: [v6ops] Implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and NDRe: [v6ops] Implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND
Dmytro Shytyi
2019-10-29
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/2V5N5myRf_zKUP92U-hU-LojGjo/
2797260
1858097
Re: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentationRe: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentation
Alexandre Petrescu
2019-09-18
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/THNBqZJS6o7lvNmrSqqCE9cmP8U/
2781752
1858282
Re: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentationRe: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentation
Mark Smith
2019-09-18
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/5rxYU5eKR-ZhBm5IZDA6tGbfcz8/
2781751
1858282
Re: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentationRe: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentation
Alexandre Petrescu
2019-09-18
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/qh6QGA9_4tB6huH53yp_FmgVHKE/
2781743
1858282
Re: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentationRe: [v6ops] "Getting IPv6 Private Addressing Right" AusNOG presentation
Alexandre Petrescu
2019-09-18
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/tATPUz8PYd9m1C8EY203tj9qY4g/
2781741
1858282
Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT in wireless home broadbandRe: [v6ops] 464XLAT in wireless home broadband
Ca By
2019-03-28
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/VP6G2L1VX9wm-mmTicHdk6Mn2MA/
2713462
1834556
Re: [v6ops] WGLC: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-02 - multiple prefixes per deviceRe: [v6ops] WGLC: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-02 - multiple prefixes per device
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-03-16
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/ZO9VdvS3LO2gDaSCqEcIcW8sqzU/
2344546
1691964
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Fred Baker
2017-03-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/qmByR0AMm0Ij7JgqfzdKc9Dp6Eg/
2338066
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-03-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/QObdJGh6Tl893d6cctzDHmdSpF4/
2337936
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
mohamed.boucadair
2017-03-06
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/TAqhPouta1juq4MIjOd1BBCaxmg/
2337832
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Brian E Carpenter
2017-03-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/mmCnbG0bDAZbiEO-tAP4zLdkqLQ/
2337733
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-03-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/icRof0tdw9Rdjj-5ivF4pq-0HAk/
2337716
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-03-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/RvdOkQDvc2USRucJSYPpWubRMPE/
2337715
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Brian E Carpenter
2017-03-05
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/4K_FBPVt7m69w5zbUdjApkvdPJU/
2337695
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Fred Baker
2017-03-04
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/SCfp397AYEh5BRbvsrINd7zyzxo/
2337669
1689035
Re: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPPRe: [v6ops] RFC7849 must not recommend 64share, and must not be recommended itself to 3GPP
Alexandre Petrescu
2017-03-04
v6ops
None
/arch/msg/v6ops/lrtHes0O0VbhmU-r8rAIt6CspTQ/
2337635
1689035