Subject
From
Date
List
[websec] Slides uploaded[websec] Slides uploaded
Yoav Nir
2013-03-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/itnkytNJc5n68erImm97rUD5s-s/
1504998
1665132
[websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only mode[websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only mode
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/nKLtICFnpe7qG9ZhN4NFyoSArO4/
1504986
1665133
Re: [websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only modeRe: [websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only mode
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/rB6MXDWeDV6fD5lScSuXCTjFNIY/
1504990
1665133
[websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinning[websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinning
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/qUDCSCbFOQhvK37D7zvMJg0hRZQ/
1504985
1665134
Re: [websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinningRe: [websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinning
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/zATo0HDrKOWd5v7eAf4uNnIDAgs/
1504991
1665134
[websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence[websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/YMaqpTBE20IleIOoQKaT7XSQo6Q/
1504984
1665135
Re: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedenceRe: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/OJ4C04TXrVKVHPBG9sG3_p9dlGQ/
1504992
1665135
Re: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedenceRe: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/vzteiMsFnEkmULxMb2aIHY1v_GI/
1504994
1665135
Re: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedenceRe: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Tom Ritter
2013-03-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ND6TFawmxYXe3SE96LyNYB2MlVA/
1504997
1665135
[websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors[websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SckcK1FPEYqjnwzdzmIjgFI3N9Q/
1504983
1665136
Re: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchorsRe: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/irLQVQBDysqR5RWFDQz_UJm-2oI/
1504987
1665136
Re: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchorsRe: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Yoav Nir
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/25piQ98LtauKYNHHSBQi0IT2DEc/
1504988
1665136
Re: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchorsRe: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1wNOMHvKh3bL336YD7SJnpAJ9Cc/
1504989
1665136
[websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required[websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/k8T5pe3VYIlDTUUod30VZj4_TFY/
1504982
1665137
Re: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as requiredRe: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/DkZR1YAR0aDD10TPtadRRT-XuaU/
1504993
1665137
Re: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as requiredRe: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required
Yoav Nir
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/cv-FEqTzqiotP2xwBCtrIzqjunI/
1504995
1665137
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt
internet-drafts
2013-02-25
websec
/arch/msg/websec/FbLx318_CmkVICsT6bIMYfAdpWM/
1504975
1665138
Re: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt - status updateRe: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt - status update
Tobias Gondrom
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/N4GEGQHGkR1NtraDtqFJM1bPFOE/
1504976
1665138
[websec] Meeting in Orlando[websec] Meeting in Orlando
Yoav Nir
2013-02-19
websec
/arch/msg/websec/BPBQoNi8Dw6fh7cGO78qU4V56EI/
1504974
1665139
Re: [websec] Meeting in OrlandoRe: [websec] Meeting in Orlando
Tobias Gondrom
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/McyORNS6G8WQZ3_6pQs35I9DAJY/
1504977
1665139
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-framework-reqs-00.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-framework-reqs-00.txt
internet-drafts
2013-02-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/MlP-NZhvc_DM0lJI6GiDwqRIjWc/
1504973
1665140
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
SM
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/dd57XmSuZiu-Gg_2s2HIbxFgL18/
1504960
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Julian Reschke
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/RjcFYosSDlTy3_1MNO_CCcnsCHk/
1504961
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Yoav Nir
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ygOg7mDFJqjPkwvPCdvu9fRMWrg/
1504962
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Julian Reschke
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SRjGELvsRaNKltFTQuGxDD2b4Ho/
1504963
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Barry Leiba
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/f5LMR9uMPjrUS5UIcwfKyq_PQB8/
1504964
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
SM
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/jhJaD3gUcBQbdyKme3Y0CVf5hNE/
1504965
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Graham Klyne
2013-02-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/emcrvipVoOrLjYB4bCBVAoaAx3Y/
1504972
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Bjoern Hoehrmann
2013-02-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/7dfLGGX4H5mkDkYZPCSW50CBxZc/
1504971
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Yoav Nir
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/zGPc7MasJpm9P6n2v8eFmrLc9zE/
1504966
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Julian Reschke
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/2kYs2cB2_nJ0HffDGmQPap2smz0/
1504968
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Mark Nottingham
2013-02-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/zbwiofkKklBL3CeuyBqCvKIxfyA/
1504969
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Julian Reschke
2013-02-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Ywa_oeXGYq8c0ae0CRheUdZ9I5U/
1504970
1665141
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Bjoern Hoehrmann
2013-03-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/-2Uz79lmGrRZpi1P1KXJjN_ip-s/
1504996
1665141
[websec] RFC6454 (Origin) vs URI schemes unlike "http"[websec] RFC6454 (Origin) vs URI schemes unlike "http"
Bjoern Hoehrmann
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ln55YxWM-uRNdxRLu9-7YH9mN2k/
1504959
1665142
Re: [websec] RFC6454 (Origin) vs URI schemes unlike "http"Re: [websec] RFC6454 (Origin) vs URI schemes unlike "http"
Adam Barth
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/czVSxWoXJ6Mbzbg53cgPcG3Vr-8/
1504967
1665142
[websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla[websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Hill, Brad
2013-02-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ta3Dkn__-vsvCPBfIx111N9p53s/
1504957
1665143
Re: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at MozillaRe: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Julian Reschke
2013-02-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/HjKS84W-rTSOFPNIx2yZWfwtnnE/
1504958
1665143
Re: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at MozillaRe: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Tobias Gondrom
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ijwod7I83su-APjU_y4MwwRS0vY/
1504978
1665143
Re: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at MozillaRe: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Julian Reschke
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SggrHLPc_FGKh4Ep5s6q1oweILI/
1504979
1665143
42 Messages