Subject
From
Date
List
[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10
=JeffH
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/oyuhyHQsYCSNZ3qi1GCQJWkViAU/
1504691
1665218
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10.txt
internet-drafts
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/OmnURhSqKdcnNlc6OkUSDHTJRZ8/
1504690
1665219
Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec - closing of WGLCRe: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec - closing of WGLC
Tobias Gondrom
2012-07-03
websec
/arch/msg/websec/iVW8zjUdIrgfgBnVAIm4_rPu--E/
1504695
1665219
[websec] #49: HSTS: mention OCSP stapling aka "Certificate Status Request" TLS extension[websec] #49: HSTS: mention OCSP stapling aka "Certificate Status Request" TLS extension
websec issue tracker
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/7hZWmFhI_YT81Oe617Aufy5hrFk/
1504689
1665220
Re: [websec] #49: HSTS: mention OCSP stapling aka "Certificate Status Request" TLS extensionRe: [websec] #49: HSTS: mention OCSP stapling aka "Certificate Status Request" TLS extension
websec issue tracker
2012-07-10
websec
/arch/msg/websec/qjUQdgmNx7PX8Ycc1cjpIsx3uBg/
1504732
1665220
[websec] #48: HSTS: max-age value in section 10.1 is incorrect[websec] #48: HSTS: max-age value in section 10.1 is incorrect
websec issue tracker
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/F0ydcbF83UzvvKAmcBCMReX3yEg/
1504688
1665221
Re: [websec] #48: HSTS: max-age value in section 10.1 is incorrectRe: [websec] #48: HSTS: max-age value in section 10.1 is incorrect
websec issue tracker
2012-07-10
websec
/arch/msg/websec/OHVOoG3nTPhORZanSpvQj1smJIU/
1504731
1665221
[websec] #47: HSTS: explicitly note that HSTS applies when following redirects[websec] #47: HSTS: explicitly note that HSTS applies when following redirects
websec issue tracker
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SLNYb2aRMUbyztxPkNRbXOhErB0/
1504687
1665222
Re: [websec] #47: HSTS: explicitly note that HSTS applies when following redirectsRe: [websec] #47: HSTS: explicitly note that HSTS applies when following redirects
websec issue tracker
2012-07-10
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ZQ9FgkZ5TUvJ70JJBq3VKctikwo/
1504730
1665222
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
=JeffH
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/r0g6Wokg2AiOuqUhbN7vax6Q6oc/
1504683
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
=JeffH
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/dzGKZxpd_pE1_uMGoeDjB_ncV4Y/
1504684
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/VELFjo2j8tP2oWJ1qE-Zda496u0/
1504685
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Peter Saint-Andre
2012-07-03
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Y-aO7JHF3flFubigspECAKVu25Q/
1504700
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Chris Palmer
2012-07-10
websec
/arch/msg/websec/qffs1GtVqhiH4zmjhE6yq8GLVUI/
1504734
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/jBd0p69hSvC_t7TuY4ayjppIO3I/
1504686
1665223
Re: [websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?Re: [websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?
=JeffH
2012-06-20
websec
/arch/msg/websec/uf3Ai-379wRnH3S1-WQUsTs3siA/
1504674
1665224
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
=JeffH
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/GpaXe7eNMowWrhdeJInEXXi7EU4/
1504660
1665225
[websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?[websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/PtgmdGRrhbl9Dh1hvFc1hpj-r0s/
1504673
1665225
[websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)[websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Dc93mk3Di1LBbTJDKLfu1FEV9X4/
1504675
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Eric Rescorla
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/bTcUWy05cFSce-BWIqRAHvjULAA/
1504676
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Steingruebl, Andy
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/RqLApOeHgINWt10m8Ac7sseu4lI/
1504677
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/xcgerTBFyGzX8gjZ58ZoPIVdhns/
1504678
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Steingruebl, Andy
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Nww8Xalvt2ARmKtk128EJP5dXzg/
1504679
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/yKQtvXKNuGG216D8Bf9H9Domdwo/
1504681
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Adam Barth
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/bhN7depogMeeUpQMSK3CQF-fwV0/
1504682
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Eric Rescorla
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/09rFfM38_4Wc-_lZuA3TntaLuT4/
1504680
1665225
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09
=JeffH
2012-06-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/UkB2ci0xu6sylJQZnVL_oYXhufo/
1504658
1665226
[websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6454 (3249)[websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6454 (3249)
RFC Errata System
2012-06-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/skggHBiHUIq6fqRRPHV2gifSnWY/
1504657
1665227
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09.txt
internet-drafts
2012-06-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/D1lroaQsF03YJfPsNQywhzZiGd4/
1504656
1665228
[websec] Fwd: [saag] Pinning[websec] Fwd: [saag] Pinning
Paul Hoffman
2012-06-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/WEUZco2kDV5OWBxsqtopnb7hmIM/
1504653
1665229
Re: [websec] PinningRe: [websec] Pinning
Yoav Nir
2012-06-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/-Ukwygg3-tyqn9ADDLsvdkQNoA4/
1504654
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/v1uHWteLwgcuVGveKjBwlYJO7_M/
1504655
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Chris Palmer
2012-08-10
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SKgE_ViUgbLdVdGmyxn_4BnDRDQ/
1504768
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Paul Hoffman
2012-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/nWBQpMIW1Z6RXxmZtpSXo7LpD0s/
1504773
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Trevor Perrin
2012-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Bo549XLQqJ8wx26j8C0IwCD1AA0/
1504774
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Yoav Nir
2012-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/wFUCk2pkhcK3iXvZvmePlxkCdIo/
1504775
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Tom Ritter
2012-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/uwy1RizwvX7kkXR0TrxhQTPVMGw/
1504776
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Yoav Nir
2012-08-11
websec
/arch/msg/websec/aJsqBZN1hG6MxwLupsisRK2gcV0/
1504780
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Tobias Gondrom
2012-08-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/6M3qX9pBsPtIFv4TEh03V1IaF0I/
1504806
1665229
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Tony Finch
2012-08-13
websec
/arch/msg/websec/jfncdhKMQONLqAyf12cTkqV-4p0/
1504782
1665229
43 Messages