Subject
From
Date
List
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
=JeffH
2012-06-01
websec
/arch/msg/websec/2F5TctbeXcepEFwZs-DNPYrxrSQ/
1504640
1665231
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
Julian Reschke
2012-06-01
websec
/arch/msg/websec/dWcPuiV9Vj5xsEcjV4hngk8scCU/
1504641
1665231
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-01
websec
/arch/msg/websec/GHhkqTx_IzrAYUIpRFKr-ec3dgQ/
1504642
1665231
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
Chris Palmer
2012-06-01
websec
/arch/msg/websec/pmP8oZCkK5waN1OujaWQAcnC19s/
1504643
1665231
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
=JeffH
2012-06-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/w_eyqmjLs0ado70GkPCj2w8bP_0/
1504644
1665231
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
Julian Reschke
2012-06-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/mRxuVTvWLTxpL7pncbiAh_6yDJs/
1504646
1665231
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
=JeffH
2012-06-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/zJOH31u20HEZUMFo1dZyYgiZal4/
1504649
1665231
Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)Re: [websec] ignoring STS header fields with undefined directives (was: new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08)
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/fQj7z3lHLhOOYmFZC7Mi8QTubYA/
1504650
1665231
[websec] #46: HSTS: AppsDir Editorial comments[websec] #46: HSTS: AppsDir Editorial comments
websec issue tracker
2012-06-01
websec
/arch/msg/websec/9pOxA-WLsJhUvXSYFXJxuBcH9eo/
1504638
1665232
Re: [websec] #46: HSTS: AppsDir Editorial commentsRe: [websec] #46: HSTS: AppsDir Editorial comments
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/qfkLDeCjhKOzEHsO5yJKwMfYq5o/
1504668
1665232
[websec] Firefox looking to add preloaded HSTS support[websec] Firefox looking to add preloaded HSTS support
Steingruebl, Andy
2012-06-01
websec
/arch/msg/websec/_8Qg9zYt_6yCnYmypWY35WtL-nI/
1504637
1665233
[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08
=JeffH
2012-05-17
websec
/arch/msg/websec/OUXhbMgqnHq_OWYhToFzWJVVa1M/
1504631
1665234
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08
Alexey Melnikov
2012-05-31
websec
/arch/msg/websec/pEsq_f3qMOHTbvrmBXRjRh79OVU/
1504632
1665234
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08
=JeffH
2012-05-31
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Pr5RJfgOqz8HnISKj6DZ3F_GYK8/
1504633
1665234
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08
Paul Hoffman
2012-05-31
websec
/arch/msg/websec/2pk68WCgtz-7WwuhUDxWAQNKZc0/
1504636
1665234
[websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09 - 2nd WGLC to close on June-25 18:00 UTC[websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09 - 2nd WGLC to close on June-25 18:00 UTC
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/lNDSjp-bB0TPdZAxjigPye8kvjI/
1504672
1665234
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-08.txt
internet-drafts
2012-05-17
websec
/arch/msg/websec/h-zpMTdJLw6bvL0ynwt7vb-bL3o/
1504630
1665235
[websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06[websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06
websec issue tracker
2012-05-09
websec
/arch/msg/websec/N_XuUVhUqhsmQomLpV1bnT4VfGs/
1504628
1665236
Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06
websec issue tracker
2012-05-31
websec
/arch/msg/websec/u66aVzqaHQtFu8mPWbjhUhleujc/
1504634
1665236
Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06
websec issue tracker
2012-05-31
websec
/arch/msg/websec/JeEnTC3NND6qYcuOZ5InkGfVfL0/
1504635
1665236
Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/DXHnDjtNgiwIC7NdbpiOPmybISc/
1504667
1665236
Re: [websec] IDNA Dependency and Migration text (was: Review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06.txt)Re: [websec] IDNA Dependency and Migration text (was: Review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06.txt)
=JeffH
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/JIcOor5nG-HZlsBKnnuXjkMKP_c/
1504624
1665237
[websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?[websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
Adam Barth
2012-05-03
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Ac475T7rz4mfjkj0vmuyLP6hAyc/
1504615
1665238
Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
Julian Reschke
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/i_kUMNyVpCmZ_ndxBN9ZnapoCgY/
1504618
1665238
Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
Adam Barth
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/d5ubvQIU0hTvXfqyiab3r1jHiw8/
1504622
1665238
Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?Re: [websec] Frame-Options: Why a header and not a CSP directive?
=JeffH
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/8K62ixl-mkoCk1MhfS17F-mdFhg/
1504626
1665238
[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07[websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
=JeffH
2012-05-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/DrlqByX19H4-aJm11P3jVXtaF4Q/
1504612
1665239
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
Murray S. Kucherawy
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/9czjB2BDTBueABniUHf04kC8QWs/
1504616
1665239
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
Murray S. Kucherawy
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1Xo8fDY2VB567BeH_WjotnkoaFg/
1504617
1665239
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
=JeffH
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/AxQYI4hmGEshQvBOUp8NVkBf0CQ/
1504621
1665239
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07
Murray S. Kucherawy
2012-05-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1k579ugQfVIiP8Kuc-NVcXSDB4o/
1504627
1665239
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-07.txt
internet-drafts
2012-05-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/IcNo3MMSBklZwj2ld4wpfF5LjWg/
1504611
1665240
Re: [websec] IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>Re: [websec] IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
=JeffH
2012-05-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/WBfdDJSy8p4KRzMhBeFhFERtILg/
1504608
1665241
Re: [websec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06Re: [websec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-06
=JeffH
2012-04-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/wGJWciRzFUBu31n8Y6WQODtY6nE/
1504601
1665242
[websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labels[websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labels
websec issue tracker
2012-04-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ZMnkcscxH0Kji9VNZie0Pq_yll0/
1504598
1665243
Re: [websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labelsRe: [websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labels
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ohYT-EvKRxIEkIdrYzI-JBZyHFM/
1504666
1665243
[websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?[websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
websec issue tracker
2012-04-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/5h8Wwi6ELRGr_5TZPMZcdzmfU-Y/
1504596
1665244
Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
websec issue tracker
2012-04-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1ieyBeprsJr3rKKrBmy0wB91_ss/
1504600
1665244
Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/MRGo0IfoU-Mq5YnCtYxXUlEQkuw/
1504665
1665244
[websec] Minutes for the Paris (IETF 83) meeting[websec] Minutes for the Paris (IETF 83) meeting
Alexey Melnikov
2012-04-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Bt4JwrJvOaw63EZrFEl9JkX3Rcg/
1504595
1665245