[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-10.txt
internet-drafts
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/OmnURhSqKdcnNlc6OkUSDHTJRZ8/
1504690
1665219
[websec] #49: HSTS: mention OCSP stapling aka "Certificate Status Request" TLS extension[websec] #49: HSTS: mention OCSP stapling aka "Certificate Status Request" TLS extension
websec issue tracker
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/7hZWmFhI_YT81Oe617Aufy5hrFk/
1504689
1665220
[websec] #48: HSTS: max-age value in section 10.1 is incorrect[websec] #48: HSTS: max-age value in section 10.1 is incorrect
websec issue tracker
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/F0ydcbF83UzvvKAmcBCMReX3yEg/
1504688
1665221
[websec] #47: HSTS: explicitly note that HSTS applies when following redirects[websec] #47: HSTS: explicitly note that HSTS applies when following redirects
websec issue tracker
2012-07-02
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SLNYb2aRMUbyztxPkNRbXOhErB0/
1504687
1665222
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/jBd0p69hSvC_t7TuY4ayjppIO3I/
1504686
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-30
websec
/arch/msg/websec/VELFjo2j8tP2oWJ1qE-Zda496u0/
1504685
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
=JeffH
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/dzGKZxpd_pE1_uMGoeDjB_ncV4Y/
1504684
1665223
Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)Re: [websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
=JeffH
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/r0g6Wokg2AiOuqUhbN7vax6Q6oc/
1504683
1665223
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Adam Barth
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/bhN7depogMeeUpQMSK3CQF-fwV0/
1504682
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/yKQtvXKNuGG216D8Bf9H9Domdwo/
1504681
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Eric Rescorla
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/09rFfM38_4Wc-_lZuA3TntaLuT4/
1504680
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Steingruebl, Andy
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Nww8Xalvt2ARmKtk128EJP5dXzg/
1504679
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/xcgerTBFyGzX8gjZ58ZoPIVdhns/
1504678
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Steingruebl, Andy
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/RqLApOeHgINWt10m8Ac7sseu4lI/
1504677
1665225
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
Eric Rescorla
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/bTcUWy05cFSce-BWIqRAHvjULAA/
1504676
1665225
[websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)[websec] "This site is testing HSTS" directive (was Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not)
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-29
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Dc93mk3Di1LBbTJDKLfu1FEV9X4/
1504675
1665225
Re: [websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?Re: [websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?
=JeffH
2012-06-20
websec
/arch/msg/websec/uf3Ai-379wRnH3S1-WQUsTs3siA/
1504674
1665224
[websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?[websec] Comments on "I am testing HSTS"-directive and Issue #41 add parameter "hardfail=no"?
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/PtgmdGRrhbl9Dh1hvFc1hpj-r0s/
1504673
1665225
[websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09 - 2nd WGLC to close on June-25 18:00 UTC[websec] draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09 - 2nd WGLC to close on June-25 18:00 UTC
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/lNDSjp-bB0TPdZAxjigPye8kvjI/
1504672
1665234
Re: [websec] #42: STS exception for CRL fetchingRe: [websec] #42: STS exception for CRL fetching
Alexey Melnikov
2012-06-17
websec
/arch/msg/websec/nN0CHXBRSlxmpF-WrpWA4-nyKtk/
1504671
1665257
Re: [websec] #42: STS exception for CRL fetchingRe: [websec] #42: STS exception for CRL fetching
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-16
websec
/arch/msg/websec/Co1X8zWC4NCV4JXNe3f9-ULZwD0/
1504670
1665257
Re: [websec] #42: STS exception for CRL fetchingRe: [websec] #42: STS exception for CRL fetching
=JeffH
2012-06-15
websec
/arch/msg/websec/UfKZ2kE7My2SPy_dJpVenriHwiE/
1504669
1665257
Re: [websec] #46: HSTS: AppsDir Editorial commentsRe: [websec] #46: HSTS: AppsDir Editorial comments
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/qfkLDeCjhKOzEHsO5yJKwMfYq5o/
1504668
1665232
Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06Re: [websec] #45: HSTS: Alexey's editorial comments on -06
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/DXHnDjtNgiwIC7NdbpiOPmybISc/
1504667
1665236
Re: [websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labelsRe: [websec] #44: terminology for referring to complete domain name (FQDN) possibly containing IDN labels
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ohYT-EvKRxIEkIdrYzI-JBZyHFM/
1504666
1665243
Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?Re: [websec] #43: HSTS: cite draft-reschke-http-status-308 and mention HTTP status code 308 ?
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/MRGo0IfoU-Mq5YnCtYxXUlEQkuw/
1504665
1665244
Re: [websec] #40: Various editorial comments on -06Re: [websec] #40: Various editorial comments on -06
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/YCceZtl_1ZkRsqwOrL5w4J1lLaY/
1504664
1665259
Re: [websec] #37: Clarify that superdomain HSTS flag does not update max-age of subdomain's HSTS max-age and vice versaRe: [websec] #37: Clarify that superdomain HSTS flag does not update max-age of subdomain's HSTS max-age and vice versa
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/uwH6uQGx7Fr03zSSc1kx3RALeN8/
1504663
1665268
Re: [websec] #39: appropriately acknowlege and accommodate DANERe: [websec] #39: appropriately acknowlege and accommodate DANE
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/mYqxgVg1eEf56AyZ1Q8cTMsM0n4/
1504662
1665260
Re: [websec] #33: HSTS: quoted-string grammar in (extension) directives ?Re: [websec] #33: HSTS: quoted-string grammar in (extension) directives ?
websec issue tracker
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/EJHE6rUEPgBPxm8sCIlZYDqr9-0/
1504661
1665291
Re: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or notRe: [websec] Issue #41 add parameter indicating whether to hardfail or not
=JeffH
2012-06-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/GpaXe7eNMowWrhdeJInEXXi7EU4/
1504660
1665225
Re: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-02.txtRe: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-02.txt
Chris Palmer
2012-06-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/nOXf5AHMb6lFuNFCj2tmEOlJYLg/
1504659
1665230
Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09Re: [websec] new rev: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09
=JeffH
2012-06-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/UkB2ci0xu6sylJQZnVL_oYXhufo/
1504658
1665226
[websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6454 (3249)[websec] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6454 (3249)
RFC Errata System
2012-06-08
websec
/arch/msg/websec/skggHBiHUIq6fqRRPHV2gifSnWY/
1504657
1665227
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec-09.txt
internet-drafts
2012-06-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/D1lroaQsF03YJfPsNQywhzZiGd4/
1504656
1665228
Re: [websec] [saag] PinningRe: [websec] [saag] Pinning
Tobias Gondrom
2012-06-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/v1uHWteLwgcuVGveKjBwlYJO7_M/
1504655
1665229
Re: [websec] PinningRe: [websec] Pinning
Yoav Nir
2012-06-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/-Ukwygg3-tyqn9ADDLsvdkQNoA4/
1504654
1665229
[websec] Fwd: [saag] Pinning[websec] Fwd: [saag] Pinning
Paul Hoffman
2012-06-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/WEUZco2kDV5OWBxsqtopnb7hmIM/
1504653
1665229
Re: [websec] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-secRe: [websec] [apps-discuss] AppsDir review of draft-ietf-websec-strict-transport-sec
=JeffH
2012-06-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/JVpItlYHImlgVPs6zf_FC1yMgmc/
1504652
1665246
Re: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-02.txtRe: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning-02.txt
Stephen Farrell
2012-06-04
websec
/arch/msg/websec/9F8V0PX-HzDc5bS9jk5ZFV1tnqk/
1504651
1665230