Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-ageRe: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age
Trevor Perrin
2013-03-22
websec
/arch/msg/websec/gTlMENnnUoMBbnzohwyUYsNiE0c/
1505014
1665128
Re: [websec] #56: Specify includeSubdomains directive for HPKPRe: [websec] #56: Specify includeSubdomains directive for HPKP
websec issue tracker
2013-03-22
websec
/arch/msg/websec/TZzPcMimeNZr3fupFtPWBbGnM4o/
1505013
1665158
Re: [websec] #56: Specify includeSubdomains directive for HPKPRe: [websec] #56: Specify includeSubdomains directive for HPKP
websec issue tracker
2013-03-22
websec
/arch/msg/websec/eU-eanjOrXgxCE1tvUJjFUchfVo/
1505012
1665158
Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-ageRe: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age
websec issue tracker
2013-03-22
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SChidPFlTU_paR9NUxDX_tUZ0AY/
1505011
1665128
Re: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-ageRe: [websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age
websec issue tracker
2013-03-22
websec
/arch/msg/websec/bdjC8pbLd9Mun55tCDlMr_-9_78/
1505010
1665128
[websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age[websec] #57: Re-add an upper limit to max-age
websec issue tracker
2013-03-22
websec
/arch/msg/websec/mZK-48jmO72C3nwFF60bfDxj5_0/
1505009
1665128
Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?
Richard Barnes
2013-03-20
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ENszr5BRytxaGfyjevEHEMKISQc/
1505008
1665130
[websec] Starting work on Session Continuation/Bound State/Management (was: Session Continuation = Session Bound State?)[websec] Starting work on Session Continuation/Bound State/Management (was: Session Continuation = Session Bound State?)
Yoav Nir
2013-03-20
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SSE-R6I4Ubln6oc-PWR00N-y3uM/
1505007
1665130
Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?
Nico Williams
2013-03-19
websec
/arch/msg/websec/AmQpWb51OvHxMdKKD3Rl3Xm2Mwk/
1505006
1665130
Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?
Harry Halpin
2013-03-19
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1uQr-jXUyvinWLGC-wccD_YVv3g/
1505005
1665130
Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?
Tobias Gondrom
2013-03-19
websec
/arch/msg/websec/8BfS7OLiAvdiJkvOFQXUNg6saTk/
1505004
1665130
Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?Re: [websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?
Yoav Nir
2013-03-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ME1vq1fJb94I9AWsyFunATzYXPw/
1505003
1665130
[websec] Some issues with key-pinning[websec] Some issues with key-pinning
Yoav Nir
2013-03-18
websec
/arch/msg/websec/oPywokuzsAe0dSboPBruGLljnGg/
1505002
1665129
Re: [websec] #52: Clarification of section 2.3.1Re: [websec] #52: Clarification of section 2.3.1
websec issue tracker
2013-03-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/AO1XE9mMenRdSzW-lWc9extnRuE/
1505001
1665191
[websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?[websec] Session Continuation = Session Bound State?
Phillip Hallam-Baker
2013-03-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/mCZm7ERLAf9XwUEf3OCqAdBdjWE/
1505000
1665130
[websec] Preliminary Minutes Uploaded[websec] Preliminary Minutes Uploaded
Yoav Nir
2013-03-14
websec
/arch/msg/websec/0NaDfNqQl5DK-uaJQa8q9ZBPx-8/
1504999
1665131
[websec] Slides uploaded[websec] Slides uploaded
Yoav Nir
2013-03-12
websec
/arch/msg/websec/itnkytNJc5n68erImm97rUD5s-s/
1504998
1665132
Re: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedenceRe: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Tom Ritter
2013-03-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ND6TFawmxYXe3SE96LyNYB2MlVA/
1504997
1665135
Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisionalRe: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional
Bjoern Hoehrmann
2013-03-07
websec
/arch/msg/websec/-2Uz79lmGrRZpi1P1KXJjN_ip-s/
1504996
1665141
Re: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as requiredRe: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required
Yoav Nir
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/cv-FEqTzqiotP2xwBCtrIzqjunI/
1504995
1665137
Re: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedenceRe: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/vzteiMsFnEkmULxMb2aIHY1v_GI/
1504994
1665135
Re: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as requiredRe: [websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/DkZR1YAR0aDD10TPtadRRT-XuaU/
1504993
1665137
Re: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedenceRe: [websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/OJ4C04TXrVKVHPBG9sG3_p9dlGQ/
1504992
1665135
Re: [websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinningRe: [websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinning
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/zATo0HDrKOWd5v7eAf4uNnIDAgs/
1504991
1665134
Re: [websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only modeRe: [websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only mode
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/rB6MXDWeDV6fD5lScSuXCTjFNIY/
1504990
1665133
Re: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchorsRe: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Tom Ritter
2013-03-06
websec
/arch/msg/websec/1wNOMHvKh3bL336YD7SJnpAJ9Cc/
1504989
1665136
Re: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchorsRe: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Yoav Nir
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/25piQ98LtauKYNHHSBQi0IT2DEc/
1504988
1665136
Re: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchorsRe: [websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/irLQVQBDysqR5RWFDQz_UJm-2oI/
1504987
1665136
[websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only mode[websec] Issue 54 - Adding a report-only mode
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/nKLtICFnpe7qG9ZhN4NFyoSArO4/
1504986
1665133
[websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinning[websec] Issue 56 - specify includeSubDomains for key pinning
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/qUDCSCbFOQhvK37D7zvMJg0hRZQ/
1504985
1665134
[websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence[websec] Issue 55 - Key pinning should clarify that the newest pinning information takes precedence
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/YMaqpTBE20IleIOoQKaT7XSQo6Q/
1504984
1665135
[websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors[websec] Issue 53 - Key pinning should clarify status of pin validation with private trust anchors
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SckcK1FPEYqjnwzdzmIjgFI3N9Q/
1504983
1665136
[websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required[websec] Issue 52 - Key pinning draft should clarify max-age as required
Ryan Sleevi
2013-03-05
websec
/arch/msg/websec/k8T5pe3VYIlDTUUod30VZj4_TFY/
1504982
1665137
Re: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at MozillaRe: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Julian Reschke
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/wvJJ85XPYgROuVoPFBTKmjWHtaE/
1504981
1665143
Re: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at MozillaRe: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Tobias Gondrom
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/3LKdgIS63HG1jjkXYrfQaqmHY6s/
1504980
1665143
Re: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at MozillaRe: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Julian Reschke
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/SggrHLPc_FGKh4Ep5s6q1oweILI/
1504979
1665143
Re: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at MozillaRe: [websec] X-Frame-Options EBNF bug at Mozilla
Tobias Gondrom
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/ijwod7I83su-APjU_y4MwwRS0vY/
1504978
1665143
Re: [websec] Meeting in OrlandoRe: [websec] Meeting in Orlando
Tobias Gondrom
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/McyORNS6G8WQZ3_6pQs35I9DAJY/
1504977
1665139
Re: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt - status updateRe: [websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt - status update
Tobias Gondrom
2013-02-26
websec
/arch/msg/websec/N4GEGQHGkR1NtraDtqFJM1bPFOE/
1504976
1665138
[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt[websec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-websec-x-frame-options-02.txt
internet-drafts
2013-02-25
websec
/arch/msg/websec/FbLx318_CmkVICsT6bIMYfAdpWM/
1504975
1665138