[100attendees] Mold/mould

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Tue, 14 November 2017 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70D1127337 for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:26:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYgycdv58J_Y for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com (mail-qt0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 022B6128990 for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h42so1175460qtk.11 for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:26:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hgcO9kPOo19rxyXfE+WMPeBLgM5pqi+WfskZW2ZVrfE=; b=nSGQqhedJAyAv5Ps3rnxxk4uNpcmH6BvU20/i+4wwazRcbMcEWtfi7yaKZyLY0oolN Q78CfoE6pYahVS1m4x6VNtq/BOHe68Gy+1egMozg8JtCLImjsbqrEmhw/udzGq7MfWY0 C7Wp/S6oIE6RT4NjFi5FpNHmn7Q4tWXI2XogQFhyFvHE6GC2yP79W8Fx88Iw+rX+Qijq VI+5Q5lcSXNsTaJtKQA5RGKOKnQhCv30i+L0w/y4XAL5RQhuOm2r8pYDKfz8gLSbBlNs xuPbElBiOMKmvi6eeSiJhYYmAjDM21Neeq3Z3mYdWlx/ov9VOfVgBSO4vqtgqBljjmyA 6b0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hgcO9kPOo19rxyXfE+WMPeBLgM5pqi+WfskZW2ZVrfE=; b=l6D9bX8e/C+S34OIUXJt4gQFOjjdtQoXOAg8taMOu9fb/k4IJHU0zNlWA6raIZP3P9 yEfnaB//lTRQqFg1w/oWg3RWlKCBi0T5yZDnEeV767xZCpN+1TdGv+zkbDkKWV9XQMFe RKyjECLOCy9DWZn9EhcrH3ybEO7WUNEMq62DvVBQiQYuV7GGJEI6SyOSxz9jaHhVV9sI oOE5RIDOzrZvdFF6t6BtzOpSnDInEOFmQyK0wRWw+SVIpQDf8uOGkydR3NYdUgwJUzzK eogdR2pWV/DBoPsURmkTN9432IX6oAXcWOeCpIUAfxWsCjJoBsU2Ba/VB3Xq8b962Df0 hAow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4auCDXnacppwxgMbADzoKAMVuu2PGO3F1OAd30COWqVoG4EGfB pnhd52cg8PTFE9LPrDw3kkJD3CoMzrs0Ra1CRbM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaYHluBBUBDFSroFRikW1nAIWztCyNkR4JSSAs69uRgmIubx2tFkEXDAUgLIANwPHEzkqH0TkSoy4KUe5+BTa4=
X-Received: by 10.200.45.89 with SMTP id o25mr5999147qta.227.1510640814721; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:26:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.36.163 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:26:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:26:54 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN7=8sq8o4+7QWYctVwwPnO7W3kNv=U0oseNndm7+231wA@mail.gmail.com>
To: 100attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e319a250edf055deb792e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/100attendees/0FNxfLZv_bQcZTmh8bvA2T4yxk4>
Subject: [100attendees] Mold/mould
X-BeenThere: 100attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 100 attendees that have opted in on this list." <100attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/100attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:100attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 06:26:58 -0000

I'm just curious if anyone else is having problems with mold here.  I was
over at the Hilton but they could not find me a room that was not moldy
(I've been sleeping on the balcony for 3 days).  So, I booked at the
Swissotel and was trying to move there today.   I've seen 3 rooms there and
they all have issues. One had mold on the wallpaper and the padded wall.
Another had a chunk of moldy drywall under the sink and then another had an
area that looked like it could have had water intrusion and you could see
that someone had vaccuumed or scraped something off the padded wall.  I am
very sensitive to mold but statistically 25% of the population has a
predisposition to become ill upon exposure to mold.  Symptoms can be really
non-specific and with jet lag folks might not be able to separate some
brain fog/fuzziness to jet lag and respiratory issues to catching a travel
cold or allergies.   It's kindof too bad that meeting venue is about done
as I think this is an important consideration.  I would actually like those
that select venues to do inexpensive mold tests - you can do one test for
around $150.

I'm going to check out another room at Swissotel and if that doesn't work
see if Fairmont has availability and then the Conrad.

If there's anyone that thinks they have a pristine hotel room somewhere
else, please let me know.  I really don't want to pay for another hotel
room and sleep on the balcony although that's a nice backup at the
Swissotel.

I will also note that some of the meeting rooms have issues.  I'm having to
wear an N95 mask in Orchard - one only has to look at the ceiling to see
the reason.

Regards,
Mary.