Re: [100attendees] Long taxi itinerary from IETF hotel to airport

Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com> Fri, 09 March 2018 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430481271DF for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:42:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6RnaELN4O0AZ for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2999C12420B for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C6B5BD5A721A3 for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 22:42:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 22:42:16 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.91]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.179]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:42:13 -0800
From: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
To: "100attendees@ietf.org" <100attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [100attendees] Long taxi itinerary from IETF hotel to airport
Thread-Index: AQHTkEFokXlSEiMXhE6GxaZDwR0xDKN57GeAgE7hhOA=
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 22:42:12 +0000
Message-ID: <25B4902B1192E84696414485F5726854135497D3@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com>
References: <6449c459-68e5-4fa2-911b-db3cb3d96b80@cea.fr> <7F2A899D-40C3-47CD-A805-5AFF943ABE42@cisco.com> <34351_1511016093_5A10469C_34351_14465_1_d9b4cc17-c882-3f91-9743-0520838871f9@cea.fr> <b00579b3-cb77-398f-f71f-bb4fef17cd18@cea.fr> <CAHkmkwtecuypVwszefVWe6JeKLNdO-8NE8xSjX=8U+r-iVstwQ@mail.gmail.com> <49171_1511250201_5A13D919_49171_12611_4_4dc8165d-7c2a-4f17-e551-df5cfa711624@cea.fr> <2a7e1dba-9a23-f7bb-532a-07d6ce86a27d@cea.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711251804460.32099@uplift.swm.pp.se> <41893_1512308702_5A23FFDD_41893_19001_1_608b66f0-8bc9-3f43-2d2b-cc79bba7a463@cea.fr> <43545_1512468375_5A266F97_43545_3189_3_53699b1c-2ca2-67ef-b1c5-c73a0afd81db@cea.fr> <10010_1514546205_5A46241C_10010_16012_1_00de851e-e8c5-ee37-cf32-c4b340ae8aac@cea.fr> <fb213537-9126-b65e-1d81-8f9a23baa5c9@cea.fr> <bbf9d244-707f-bcc8-f7fe-8d6c3e7d9236@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <bbf9d244-707f-bcc8-f7fe-8d6c3e7d9236@gont.com.ar>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.209.217.127]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/100attendees/6qMOH2H0-Bhf_YhMt5NLLvCMQPU>
Subject: Re: [100attendees] Long taxi itinerary from IETF hotel to airport
X-BeenThere: 100attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 100 attendees that have opted in on this list." <100attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/100attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:100attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 22:42:20 -0000

 
	>> It is interesting to remark how LTA formalizes this offence, that I 
	>> agree with: "failing to proceed to destination by shortest and most 
	>> direct route, [...]  under rule 23(1)(c) of Road Traffic [...] Rules".
	>> 
	>> (it  makes wonder whether IETF has an RFC that recommends that IP 
	>> paths should be shortest.)

     >At times it requires good traffic engineering to properly deliver the passengers -- "shortest" path could be congested :-)

And this underlying roads/infrastructure enables other SDOs work (uRLLC, mMTC..etc)  and they call this as "slice"

Cheers!
--
Uma C.