IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [100attendees] Side Meeting on considerations on using short-term certificates.

Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com> Tue, 14 November 2017 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <orif@qwilt.com>
X-Original-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A0C129B89 for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:30:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=qwilt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DyULIXI_i1pk for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EEC5129B9B for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id g11so11306616vkd.13 for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:30:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qwilt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T7o4lfQxtR4mwiGItRGPj2JCWcLJfU95SrkQQUBZw8c=; b=Dw9W4iArIcMptKpyAxQb45de729w/pypp3XIHDnk8MgOmzMeHwhrLzaQt1Ax2O1AkZ e2oZ9cyzWLq4RIDKpyz8+M6VDkuVooL1Uitwimjbem/9GK2iHb4GNMnMSI3Wk371eXdF mcnG7796XncRnOBBh3wypR8xkRFbWcPTpAznEdVEf3FWW4aXRlCamjZ+UqGhSY/X4nvE zwWJC5x08FFzMDY4BbkllrMZRCGDVzvznhdVitP3PyV7fbboDfDPyyDQdi77GXqwEnhH YqYkGp4UCxP0hUrCeqDu2TFT4ObG7zXdZoCWmCKUO8mpV/K/T3+7L3mKJEr90zaKYp6t dgdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T7o4lfQxtR4mwiGItRGPj2JCWcLJfU95SrkQQUBZw8c=; b=KiunbgmOEKmOv2d/beEjtPPQUvzr3IYYkcInHtqjhH8yz568nUVLlZWiprrdHEJd2w WrZHs4gwQL/btsaGWfJhzHrSJbTDcKYDC9VVpY9mo5Ai1r4m8tUIKCgv6k2TSsEy5Pxs rKYRcMhyH549IqOTxaMSHTFsRlfh7kWOgKlNYHcXEjNT1WaCm2lL8n1zJT/azYtrt/Jd BboLsw9Qsv1M9h9c2XufLE7HpwUIPwxtWaI1t9gJVvNwMAwcl/RGg3QI49XkTXKYCNDU EFfZgtURBIF7u0JyOQXpI5cSLj++MLz90agLtmNufPjYf9a6jjo8lJozQY2ekLNQ7CRr 8GPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4vewa4zcvyMo4c4Nt/KyfuK3Rg0AI7vFS1ZBRA5CsjIz/uSFKM CWwxlmL5HU84eizECSbGfYj+Xp5QSE1lCEfNS25PHXUs8jo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMb9GbHCOp9WuuVXd9u8qIP7bR/QGaDxeQmfZAwIV9j0so4ZD4CgaLaMIalN3Zin19vRrIjs6pgfST3DwFdan/0=
X-Received: by 10.31.238.138 with SMTP id m132mr8159631vkh.114.1510626600112; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:30:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.153.5 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:29:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7AEE0333-EF1B-49CF-A9D6-88D0A491C541@gmail.com>
References: <7AEE0333-EF1B-49CF-A9D6-88D0A491C541@gmail.com>
From: Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:29:29 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMb9nTsFiBmbMKL+_JqL3JAzZPi78jVEejxAu6jd-nYU1ArwQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: 100attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c14979ce367c6055de829b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/100attendees/AdUFbt3K4Nssz2-dl0Sw8GFcfs8>
Subject: Re: [100attendees] Side Meeting on considerations on using short-term certificates.
X-BeenThere: 100attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 100 attendees that have opted in on this list." <100attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/100attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:100attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:30:03 -0000

Hi Yoav,
Unfortunately it collides with CDNI session.
It would be good to consider to the work done in CDNI and specifically
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fieau-cdni-https-delegation-02#section-5
where the use of STAR is considered.
Also, a specific use case would be the delegation of traffic from a
commercial CDN to an ISP CDN, in which case the domain and certs still
belong to the content provider.
So there may be a short term certs relationship between the content
provider and their CDN and then to the ISP.

Ori


On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, all
>
> In recent years there’s been growing interest in short-term
> automatically-renewed (STAR) certificates.  The idea is to renew
> certificates often and forego revocation checking.
>
> ACME has a draft for such certificate, and STIR has a candidate among
> others.
>
> STAR certificates have somewhat different operational and security
> properties compared to regular PKI.  I’ve tried to document some of them in
> a draft:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-saag-star-00
> This draft is in a very initial state, and I’m looking for input about
> this.
>
> I’ve reserved the Hullet room on Thursday at 18:00.  Anyone who’s
> interested is invited.
>
> Hope to see you there
>
> Yoav
>
> _______________________________________________
> 100attendees mailing list
> 100attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees
>



-- 

*Ori Finkelman*Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 | Mobile: +972-52-3832189 |
orif@qwilt.com

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email