IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [100attendees] IETFers app: I1h problem?

"SYS Com - www.syscom.co.in" <info@syscom.co.in> Thu, 09 November 2017 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <info@syscom.co.in>
X-Original-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5914212EBCF for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 22:32:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXUlRJ_3YuLA for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 22:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p3plsmtpa08-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa08-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 371E012EBCB for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 22:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]) by :SMTPAUTH: with SMTP id CgOGeQxengCEHCgOGe8ZGM; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:32:40 -0700
Received: by mail-yw0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w2so4428498ywa.9 for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:32:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX74eHCwiieaRAKT58zGWcz0PGIO71sA5DQLBBY+Sld6nDUhTOxj qrS1XVvrZL5Z3JhvdPOXSJ1jbQ4HCWEGG7cew1A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QcOjJIZprHNNoKCqMuHh6qDUKa6fj1/b4c5G78gU0QiwjgQ2y3rIYaqVb8r9Sr0zqcWdeioRVevp3y8h124Cc=
X-Received: by 10.129.39.215 with SMTP id n206mr2109038ywn.380.1510209159949; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:32:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.234.16 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 22:31:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <63c1eb86-2948-e975-5bd7-61afcc48c2da@bluepopcorn.net>
References: <63c1eb86-2948-e975-5bd7-61afcc48c2da@bluepopcorn.net>
From: "SYS Com - www.syscom.co.in" <info@syscom.co.in>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:01:59 +0530
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAKFu26i6+HmbvdgTEHpi8J+52k=HLsuOyH8xRQNsDOCtOTZ-_A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKFu26i6+HmbvdgTEHpi8J+52k=HLsuOyH8xRQNsDOCtOTZ-_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Cc: 100attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141d9ba83f3f6055d86f877"
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDROceWKQuM7DgcnRpCiONvppT6M8KsY9StnmeLX53HUoRjjy9u3quXfOFXHQfsFIaRCb5xEPX9FSRhtv/j+OHbjJLGWyNPrP/pTU11cUXkFRKknpNMG qf+M2ldH/fpGeOg4E7JyB2pw0VH2LoLZiYFxmxa61/47ZSW7wRnzCYrim5bz/TNCqAsaPXA/if+cOQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/100attendees/CW4CYZ26IdZwarpT5lBZsV6wkmw>
Subject: Re: [100attendees] IETFers app: I1h problem?
X-BeenThere: 100attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 100 attendees that have opted in on this list." <100attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/100attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:100attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 06:32:42 -0000

UNSUBSCRIBE




On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> wrote:

> I looked at the IETFers mobile app several times recently and only saw
> meetings through IETF 99, and thought that perhaps the schedule just
> hadn't been loaded yet. But eventually I happened to scroll down and see
> IETF 100 at the very bottom of the list (below IETF 60 and IETF 101). So
> that's where it is if you haven't happened to try that.
>
> Apparently the meetings are sorted alphanumerically. Does this mean that
> we have an "I1h" (IETF 1 hectomeeting) problem? :)
>
> -Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 100attendees mailing list
> 100attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email