IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [100attendees] IETFers app: I1h problem?

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 09 November 2017 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0A512EC07 for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:06:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6OI1mjCYI-1 for <100attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:06:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8228212EBDC for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:06:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z3so15365303wme.5 for <100attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:06:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H6PEVUsfOwdcx7pCk5EKo+5FofYV0A4NB5oM+bF5AqY=; b=zwJAzGbUV1c4fKiaqrKJRl9ZcwtpVWCghYAe4dwjE28o/7aCjeOuGZCoACbvvWsxl6 hAG+vG9AqAoIcXppSIqgQiYrCw4+nKlRuRpHuGNq1oq/HLsRHydf31deonJA+raNH45/ IlV1kqb0qaNF16SyEQ/twuc1h/DN95RGfyXp3H8sAYqybvKWvBr4CEyk8yPVAAnJZ5mC 3IkQeLUCWV8Pw6cFolyIdzZpPBw628g94megBmab21XycZ3aU1r1CAIOIPoIs3ZNARoK 6Gp7+rAjlSxkglJJrvq0knDd3UD4z7LT+Szgi2nPOhh99LCIaABarnQJ+ooTr4D+ZSi5 twUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H6PEVUsfOwdcx7pCk5EKo+5FofYV0A4NB5oM+bF5AqY=; b=SFfMdc8Bd0NzS54yAErc+og/G1eY0H2OgD3oyYqBX048HFhg4zLxYIOe/YPOalgbcQ e1vrmcV1on7EI7Dtv7j6IwaBa5tLLJRsYu9WXOcorcBrKdg1fP1bOW5/sMwggz40IWfr gJCDaezLf0YYDg3C6dn/7pEI0tWPQcYztuAgaAzLXB2FT7KtojHwhsKeP5Dm1zzoswGr vQ1uOgOBJq3Sfk7Ty89WiP4r9aRk5LnY8MMMKBzElYp1J75Q1AfOegPE4pCyryFpllm2 Yz/+OBkS5RLio2JDVPMQm1FjaLe9B0I416K/7lK7vhLqCD/AZdu72E188A1ssKf2fo3X PVBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7oRB+ZTVFXSo8uPPFKtApfa72Ig2kp5vWyMUhFGkk7kTMXYh5o 4Nxe9fPUQIoaumHtt5SRJN37L4r7W5/+qugy3rnPJQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYVoZST6owBeA2YKFm4z+3vQnSkk6V/3JezvVltmoNTI+VS5Znh9H8c0cZi4UbLYV8cte08ITtP4ZTS7Wd1mSQ=
X-Received: by 10.28.191.80 with SMTP id p77mr597200wmf.85.1510211161757; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:06:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.160.149 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:05:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1711082339230.18444@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <63c1eb86-2948-e975-5bd7-61afcc48c2da@bluepopcorn.net> <CAMeF8nCGOd+M8DaP-r+m=ewK4iNzr_D2z3Jz5K3MkE0OQiAANA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1711082339230.18444@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 15:05:21 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHw9_i+CUN-zXXWU-jDBRdW=GcuZ-ChfD3Vi15HnCVt0ZmP+3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@google.com>, 100attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/100attendees/o1d4Ttd3Pljjnl03Pr6M_tFNvNE>
Subject: Re: [100attendees] IETFers app: I1h problem?
X-BeenThere: 100attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 100 attendees that have opted in on this list." <100attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/100attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:100attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees>, <mailto:100attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 07:06:05 -0000

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Chris Morrow wrote:
>
>> Subject: Re: [100attendees] IETFers app: I1h problem?
>>
>> Which app are you referring to? The Android ietf app or something
>> else?(Maintainer of android app hat on)
>
>
> the iphone ones shows 101 and 100 at the top as expected.

It does *now*, but earlier in the week they were at the bottom of the list.
W

>
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 100attendees mailing list
> 100attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/100attendees



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email