IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [102attendees] [103attendees] Visa problems - need a different invitation letter

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Thu, 18 October 2018 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: 102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25D1129C6B for <102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mgRp3HCeHsCQ for <102attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCA3124BE5 for <102attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2603:3015:3606:cbe1:7533:b77:8eb3:f15d] (unknown [IPv6:2603:3015:3606:cbe1:7533:b77:8eb3:f15d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5C335410CA; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:21:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <C65D6EE8-7580-44B2-A66A-C6C331C044D8@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 10:21:20 -0400
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "102attendees@ietf.org" <102attendees@ietf.org>, "msj@nthpermutation.com" <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <809890B9-9A44-4229-AB68-B3D3A99ADF3D@puck.nether.net>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1808291846180.5588@ole-pro-2.local> <163e477e-956b-c388-a062-115ad64629c2@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1808291954390.5588@ole-pro-2.local> <1762761125.28180.1535604751601@ichabod.co-bxl> <0DCD267A-8333-41D2-875B-F68051789BB8@gmail.com> <1725ef85-0763-85ca-7e31-bd251e4b4bac@ericsson.com> <20180904131753.wcqvts3d6nuyf56s@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <F5C76E02-3918-4525-9F5E-6EF95287D677@isoc.org> <C43F0F29-DB56-4723-976E-442177384EEC@nostrum.com> <AD352F893CC34984364088EE@PSB> <20180904191755.5gg56vmzkt7cbcxr@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CY4PR22MB0983CC2A54C8CF7CF733AB84DA020@CY4PR22MB0983.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <48c29065c1f6498c88f6ac30715ee75f@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <55efde6f-39af-b7de-8676-612bea716e1d@nthpermutation.com> <CAKD1Yr1bK2WO75=XTQvTOT0TF8AS0=PDD9nUSNX2quGhJEkA1Q@mail.gmail.com> <C65D6EE8-7580-44B2-A66A-C6C331C044D8@cisco.com>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/102attendees/nULOd1lMv4iUuepHwlc3IGpCIn0>
Subject: Re: [102attendees] [103attendees] Visa problems - need a different invitation letter
X-BeenThere: 102attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 102 attendees that have opted in on this list <102attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/102attendees>, <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/102attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:102attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/102attendees>, <mailto:102attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:21:24 -0000


> On Oct 18, 2018, at 8:20 AM, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) <jheitz@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Most of us are “employed or working for income” while attending, not on vacation or time off. Someone is paying for our time to be there.

I’m also paid while I’m on vacation/leave.  I’m shocked, shocked that some people would be so literal in the IETF.

Next stop: Casablanca?

- Jared

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email