IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [103attendees] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00.txt

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 03:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F201293FB for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:59:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cNh_81aU9_rz for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 146B8124C04 for <103attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id wA83qbDE000950; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 03:59:46 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Ot9400mlPW5XeEaXGGh05xjbnd4HdC8DNtMAtsxP8kU=; b=kZOLvji96bXaGNCZSwlj+Ayy489TOLmEisGI7qQcnZAzUESRCiGTtSoe+6XwhkgONOtL M1q6NWYn6eBXM3bTpxfDNxFq7wagKEn4Y5DMzgDDBAES7k10HlLv7G2YZ6nlTb0dUPK9 vWcja0k2X4mHDzO7w5yPxRdHmV9yf9P91S0hC1nIB91VMMASH8THWeRHQu5G0k/2nFLu mi8Ph//EaKIzDDO/yS1+j7umIw5HsUGR6syUxIMEjmyvoqCGdXYqIWakTAdny0sq3oQz 8E3ETsbuynrRBoT2OkaOpV0or81/dsGeCm3ELeWK+CHTBl7+Gu2VOvEcQcwhU0hBlIw/ Pg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a96-6-114-86.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2nm90n13b8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 08 Nov 2018 03:59:45 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id wA83oFAb016738; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:59:45 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.32]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2njxh4271q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 07 Nov 2018 22:59:45 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:59:44 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1365.000; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 21:59:44 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>, "103attendees@ietf.org" <103attendees@ietf.org>
CC: "hgs@cs.columbia.edu" <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
Thread-Topic: [103attendees] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUdxHjPbqp3rn410iRKIR4zSJJyaVGGr2A
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 03:59:44 +0000
Message-ID: <1C5D55AC-F021-406E-A67C-4BB00671776C@akamai.com>
References: <154164679197.26360.2304672742129507952.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAPsNn2UfTNg-XLgmWXyn74rJy0WpQ+hf53SkyUQ6VcbQ-NOsVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPsNn2UfTNg-XLgmWXyn74rJy0WpQ+hf53SkyUQ6VcbQ-NOsVA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.13.0.181104
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.43.87]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1C5D55ACF021406EA67C4BB00671776Cakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-11-08_02:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=852 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1811080030
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-11-08_02:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=841 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1811080031
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/103attendees/6iUZHmYW6ugNfxsUJRUf655Hg8c>
Subject: Re: [103attendees] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 103attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 103 attendees that have opted in on this list <103attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/103attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:103attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 03:59:56 -0000

I am not sure where the best place to discuss this draft is, but I am pretty sure that a mailing list of a subset of folks who are attending the current IETF meeting is most definitely *not* the best place.

I also share Ted’s concern that there is an implied repudiation of “rough consensus” in this draft, and we would all be better served if it were made explicit.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email