Re: [103attendees] Thanks, Bangkok !

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Sat, 10 November 2018 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA8E12D4ED for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 00:15:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RwmXWHN_tx2R for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 00:14:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3588E130E11 for <103attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 00:14:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42sVDQ2srszG8y; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:14:30 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1541837670; bh=AN6cJlAvmyWDgMz9gLXxmMi1zpdbKS8YS+d0Yt6KUN0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=BOeZ5Dz4mgVlFfrihNgKNhCqyIkLAlL5R+EXmHm4k+K28EbKVMcJ04UuNUSudx5Uv PVM+IDJvuHZg1u2tNSergF69Gxj4oO4KkAsjJV+G8hS9znjFWW0jd26cTai6y6e1hk 5sjwYQ1lJ4F9S3toRWtK6sm/VhWaybET84Ggk24A=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WCfxzvLYHSPR; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:14:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:14:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [13.0.3.96] (unknown [184.22.6.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A866D31941E; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:14:27 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca A866D31941E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16A405)
In-Reply-To: <m2in154bcg.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 15:14:23 +0700
Cc: 103attendees@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6251EC0F-E8FB-433F-8EB1-8FA6C48FEE5A@nohats.ca>
References: <3F80FD28-C7D9-4C72-96FA-1ACD60A3A4B3@ackl.io> <A79C84DA-FE18-42C4-AC09-4B25B7537A71@F5.com> <CAMugd_VzrH9b4P10isG-hnffVd95hp5-etiJbg1TOfGwCow3Gg@mail.gmail.com> <112D1FE7-3C5C-4FC0-9F30-8386CB8460C0@nohats.ca> <m2in154bcg.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/103attendees/E1iIISq_2bDlhtWzyKEfcnmqlXk>
Subject: Re: [103attendees] Thanks, Bangkok !
X-BeenThere: 103attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 103 attendees that have opted in on this list <103attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/103attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:103attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 08:15:02 -0000

On Nov 10, 2018, at 14:53, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>; wrote:

>> I did notice that due to the scattered floors, there was very little
>> chance to run into people, which reduced the hallway chatter for me. I
>> wonder if there is a way to keep the meeting more confined to less
>> floors.
> 
> i think that was the friday experiment.

No, I was talking about the times between meetings or when you have an empty slot.

Although some of my charting / connecting I do at the hackathon.


>  how did that work out for you.
> place seemed pretty empty to me.  folk went off campus to see wats up?

I flew out Friday morning

Paul