[103attendees] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00.txt

nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
X-Original-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55573130E1A for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:17:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lRxh_9-hw3d9 for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:17:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C96D130E23 for <103attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id c16so13083580lfj.8 for <103attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:17:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3rdCjRKkfe50NcxkuoAK0yWRPn3Wt1weLjdkVpChLyc=; b=CwAR1TUKQYVa8ZTnEmduIv81XjvVxUREKQHzLBA1cnsB/++7H5ilekiTZwNFdTwhlt GIoLVYpO+ZJmYET2sq5Xr8k86Agb5405oJhT31wo2fBBBJtx0jmmfIn4LU2YiGdbYK6N gzjxCW8ecixoEuo8ERXg+j3pXYIdH0B2//A2lJt1qMbDfc5leuiSOpglZO82IvHnmyCi mijevG35BfP+YCau7BMe3X6GjM7seIPN2UZoWTz/45j9KzD6pIM5EzGcLRMPccnTzzLw SkKWsh16FQz6qGK5dJIpHXG1F60aOhBJeRd1c15CrpLv8EXJ08NZsGDiUOM1brNODqiW ATrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3rdCjRKkfe50NcxkuoAK0yWRPn3Wt1weLjdkVpChLyc=; b=hfbWALf07DME5E067rukAw+tT64QJ7N8kTxO21EHnnWmhTXbIQc1IuvEnA9USM7Zd0 /zV5X4UazWLtTHOvw3a+sUkNTKuxnGYLacSIfvaol+6g5v2V2yhupUkci954klZrloW2 axA7vyJ1YEvWO1JOy1doMdmDD9lGUn/K2HgmVlUIFgSTjsNmz90GCogQkfhAtKb7W4Rq 5hcCNXmBofp9Z76gXr+c5OTVjiJBMWsVvdBY10cEgxUt57HbPxmRJDrzwcsynuE0qZnO E4nFWPu58D79U9NYVPZmA76Zz47UFox/J6g2yh+yT/5bYaLEyV04Omo2w/X7iKzbmR8b mRfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLZHz4Z6kL0pHsl/6n43pkRBLYgbYGyZcKEZrAlEp6DjnZDn9b7 MOvO+vEkX2agrq3+Q4i5pLVgjdZGusbzpf9aN45xTJFU1Ho=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fMMzPssRrEbC50XUlMkTcS8NiUtX8KF4xkgeiCT57MmSGwnlEpSFHQoeQXtMU/Ln6Ts6Ttm7xpIC/2jESRnLM=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:5349:: with SMTP id h70mr1545975lfb.24.1541647072371; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:17:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6504:60d:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:17:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <154164679197.26360.2304672742129507952.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <154164679197.26360.2304672742129507952.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:17:52 +0700
Message-ID: <CAPsNn2UfTNg-XLgmWXyn74rJy0WpQ+hf53SkyUQ6VcbQ-NOsVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: 103attendees@ietf.org
Cc: hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001e3d1b057a1eae37"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/103attendees/VOfKA6u4zafX2WsyozGuM1vzHfs>
Subject: [103attendees] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00.txt
X-BeenThere: 103attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 103 attendees that have opted in on this list <103attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/103attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:103attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 03:17:57 -0000

All,

This is the problem statement on consensus building and conflict resolution
that Henning and I have been working on.  I spoke about this at the Plenary
yesterday.

There will be a companion document on solutions.   Please let us know any
thoughts you have.  I think it is best to define the problems quite clearly
before moving to solutions.

Thanks,
Nalini

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:13 AM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00.txt
To: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>, Henning Schulzrinne <
hgs@cs.columbia.edu>



A new version of I-D, draft-elkschul-conflict-problem-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Nalini Elkins and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-elkschul-conflict-problem
Revision:       00
Title:          Conflict Resolution within a Working Group: Problem
Statement
Document date:  2018-11-08
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          11
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elkschul-conflict
-problem-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-elkschul-conflict-pr
oblem/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-elkschul-conflict-problem
-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-elkschul-confli
ct-problem


Abstract:
   At the IETF, we currently use a set of methods to communicate a point
   of view, to solicit input, to resolve conflict and attempt to obtain
   consensus within the group.  These methods include: writing an
   Internet Draft, discussion on email lists, discussion at face-to-
   face, interim or virtual meetings, and design teams.  At times, these
   methods fall short.  People become entrenched in their positions.  A
   Working Group may be split 80-20 or 70-30 for a prolonged period.
   This wastes time and energy and may have a lasting impact.  This
   document discusses the benefits and drawbacks of each of the current
   methods of communication focusing solely on their efficacy at
   conflict resolution.   A companion document will propose some
   solutions including alternative methods of conflict resolution.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat




-- 
Thanks,
Nalini Elkins
President
Enterprise Data Center Operators
www.e-dco.com