IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [103attendees] Thanks, Bangkok !

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Fri, 09 November 2018 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA17130D7A for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:22:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gk8BaPCSuAVw for <103attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028CE124D68 for <103attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:22:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C2C548004; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:21:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id B6FAF440210; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:21:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 12:21:58 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>, 103attendees@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181109112158.xovuhizfwwdff6b4@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <3F80FD28-C7D9-4C72-96FA-1ACD60A3A4B3@ackl.io> <7C9CE065-947B-435F-A8DA-FDDA0C3B1DBB@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7C9CE065-947B-435F-A8DA-FDDA0C3B1DBB@tzi.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/103attendees/nG0NXbyEx14UQ-k0Ivnl0c0Mymc>
Subject: Re: [103attendees] Thanks, Bangkok !
X-BeenThere: 103attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of IETF 103 attendees that have opted in on this list <103attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/103attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:103attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/103attendees>, <mailto:103attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 11:22:05 -0000

On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 03:44:49PM +0700, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I think Singapore and Bangkok are now for Asia what Berlin and Prague are for Europe.

Different Pro/Cons:

Bangkok seemed more a value city, Singapore more expensive.
Singapore more fairly away from Europe/USA, Bangkok worse for USA
Humidity/heat seemed to be lower than Singapore
Less easily found, distributed across more floors informal meeting
space (Montreal stands out as best in this ranking).
Food excellent, especially the hotel restaurant. Amazing. My
bathroom scale will be so mad with me.

Strong B+, the 20++ hour travel would still be by biggest downer.

Cheers
    Toerless

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email