Re: [104attendees] Hilton Honors points lower than expected?

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 03 April 2019 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=19964a540d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75DA1201CA for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G8ZgGX2mPe-v for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57A46120249 for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1554279876; x=1554884676; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type; bh=v/kBKagNuDlw2j1tIu6MSyQfscHm+7RCGG c30STPVAQ=; b=a+/isCvPQ/Qa6FxmK0hwjxliVxNUzy7Cqgz71P8enuhB2sJnVq fSioYh9StNBWA9LYWnGNDfDO5DaG3DMtJdbXEoif76wry8KeWADEVVgtm3yUUCeo H682q886tvGF8pVxgycZT9mrRA9JvJH6PSstOE/40joMbCHiah8Tvpz00=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:24:36 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:24:36 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.139] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50006206993.msg for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:24:36 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:8594:39c1:2997:38c0
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.139]
X-MDArrival-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:24:36 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=19964a540d=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: 104attendees@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.8.190312
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 10:24:34 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: 104 attendees <104attendees@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <43A6FF8E-CB3F-4BCC-9222-44DC746E667D@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [104attendees] Hilton Honors points lower than expected?
References: <6585C597-2FFD-4B2D-926C-1B43994A183D@eggert.org> <B2D36E0C-085F-4511-AB81-271FD0408EA5@consulintel.es> <BFDF69C1-EA13-44F8-81FF-421C0CFF26DB@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <BFDF69C1-EA13-44F8-81FF-421C0CFF26DB@eggert.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3637131874_991667774"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/104attendees/Oilfw_OdeGGyTAXOVrzCErf0fPE>
Subject: Re: [104attendees] Hilton Honors points lower than expected?
X-BeenThere: 104attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 104 attendees for official communication <104attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/104attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:104attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 08:24:41 -0000

Yes, I also had the deposit, but I tried to calculate myself the points based in the last payment only, and didn’t match anyway, so I don’t think the problem is there.

 

In my case being elite gold, it should be including the 80% bonus points, about 18 points per usd.


Regards,

Jordi

 

 

 

El 3/4/19 10:21, "104attendees en nombre de Lars Eggert" <104attendees-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de lars@eggert.org> escribió:

 

On 2019-4-3, at 10:07, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

I think I'm in the same situation, much less points than expected. I just sent a complain to HHonors.

 

Did you also see a "deposit" charged on your first or second day? Mine was more than 50% of the total bill, and I wonder if they "forgot" to include that in the base points calculation. (It would roughly correspond to the points discrepancy.)

 

Lars

-- 104attendees mailing list 104attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.