Re: [104attendees] PRG Departures Experience

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 02 April 2019 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE3512016B for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 07:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4D2MdXpaduXz for <104attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 07:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E06FF12016A for <104attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 07:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B10E6242109D; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:06:09 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7AFBFD3-8278-4219-A186-9AD63C42B0A8@tislabs.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 15:06:09 +0100
Cc: 104attendees@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E0D6F9CE-58C9-4BE1-B7F0-736E44E655A3@rfc1035.com>
References: <74DD99D6-6DBF-4900-8766-FB0E8FB400E9@cable.comcast.com> <7AF98565-AA2F-4623-B335-25C40357296A@krsek.cz> <CAMeF8nA3OqQwki8wO+Z9UH1pevTr3dcTB7fe2nwe4t_fVtD-8A@mail.gmail.com> <C7AFBFD3-8278-4219-A186-9AD63C42B0A8@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/104attendees/mfgvzEd0Nkp3aTUQFzCN_BruB7Q>
Subject: Re: [104attendees] PRG Departures Experience
X-BeenThere: 104attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 104 attendees for official communication <104attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/104attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:104attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/104attendees>, <mailto:104attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:06:16 -0000

On 2 Apr 2019, at 14:19, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> All in all, the three hour layover at BRU was not overly generous.

The same is true at most big airports. Sometimes the transfers are quick and painless, sometimes they’re not. Sorry you lost this time.

FWIW check out EU.261. If you’re on a through ticket, you should be entitled to compensation if you miss a connecting flight in/out of the EU because of airport queues. ie If the airline allowed 2 hours to change planes at LHR or wherever and you missed the connection because it took you 3, it’s the airline’s problem.

> Note to self:  allow lots of transfer time when leaving the EU.

There’s a bunch of useless politicicans in London who badly need that advice.