Re: [105attendees] Posting slides for side meetings

<mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com> Mon, 22 July 2019 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com>
X-Original-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C98120052 for <105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=internetpolicyadvisors.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-OV93wZukyv for <105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fossa.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (fossa.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6777120019 for <105attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A322141732; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-1-113.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.1.113]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 47377142D64; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:01:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.3); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:01:45 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Cellar-Relation: 54a746805388167c_1563811304903_2236149605
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1563811304903:3336898373
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1563811304902
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BD07F473; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d= internetpolicyadvisors.com; h=reply-to:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=internetpolicyadvisors.com; bh=RPgWpB+glkt5RC36gAqeeP2vZsA=; b= veYYbuEE7CRNMD5eNSRW/RkaYsr/7PRL32XeDsZ87jL8vF+wDX+Yk4x8f6Kd40Qg O6Ru/w2t8Fw0Z7d+xr+FhjLtJL3UYz3dvIUbJ2AeCOjdV3PiRZ3obL0yBY+PpK8u FccOykHQ/V5cYf8yT9wYm6cL40EtboqW0NKCHKpnZL8=
Received: from Rothko (dhcp-8261.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.130.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 697C17F49C; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a88
From: mark@internetpolicyadvisors.com
To: 'Robert Moskowitz' <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>, 'Joseph Lorenzo Hall' <joe@cdt.org>
Cc: '105 attendees' <105attendees@ietf.org>
References: <b879560a-5e63-bebc-8be0-af69407bdb49@labs.htt-consult.com> <CABtrr-V3GvqDTVe7ejpL1bccOMGdxANOWYS47qrx2nxy68RmPQ@mail.gmail.com> <8130596b-8d0b-78cb-7bd9-570f7b520e73@labs.htt-consult.com>
In-Reply-To: <8130596b-8d0b-78cb-7bd9-570f7b520e73@labs.htt-consult.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:01:32 -0500
Organization: internet policy advisors
Message-ID: <086801d540a6$bde88a20$39b99e60$@internetpolicyadvisors.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0869_01D5407C.D514A500"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQLmLOTXuvhHefgb0yNpGmW42oqrnwMQ5LtrAmdNRSGkiTHGYA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrjeeggdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpehrhffvfhgjufffohfkgggtofhtsehrtdhgpedvtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeeomhgrrhhksehinhhtvghrnhgvthhpohhlihgthigrughvihhsohhrshdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpegtughtrdhorhhgpdhjohhsvghphhhhrghllhdrohhrghdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppeefuddrudeffedrudeftddrleejnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopeftohhthhhkohdpihhnvghtpeefuddrudeffedrudeftddrleejpdhrvghtuhhrnhdqphgrthhhpeeomhgrrhhksehinhhtvghrnhgvthhpohhlihgthigrughvihhsohhrshdrtghomheqpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhgrrhhksehinhhtvghrnhgvthhpohhlihgthigrughvihhsohhrshdrtghomhdpnhhrtghpthhtoheprhhgmheslhgrsghsrdhhthhtqdgtohhnshhulhhtrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/105attendees/1sgYY6s24CheMaFs_Zf8HCno9_I>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] Posting slides for side meetings
X-BeenThere: 105attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <105attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/105attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:105attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:01:51 -0000

Just to +1 on Bob’s note. I have slides for an unofficial side meeting that I would love to have posted on the IETF webspace.

 

mark

 

Mark McFadden

Principal Consultant

 <mailto:mark@internetpolicyadvisors.co.uk> mark@internetpolicyadvisors.co.uk

 



 

 

From: 105attendees <105attendees-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 10:41 AM
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Cc: 105 attendees <105attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] Posting slides for side meetings

 

This side meeting is not related to any scheduled session, so that is not an option.

It is just a small effort for me to put them on my server and provide the URL.  I just would like something within the IETF for these.

On 7/22/19 11:37 AM, Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:

If there is a 105 session assigned you should be able to log in to Datatracker, find the session URL like this and upload a "suggested" deck that chairs can approve:

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/session/pearg

 

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:34 AM Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com <mailto:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> > wrote:

Is there a 'standard' approved place to post slides related to a side meeting?

One that has a non-wg mailing list?

This is for tm-rid today during PM3 slot.

thanks



-- 
Robert Moskowitz
Owner
HTT Consulting
C:      248-219-2059
F:      248-968-2824
E:      rgm@labs.htt-consult.com <mailto:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> 

There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who gets the credit

-- 
105attendees mailing list
105attendees@ietf.org <mailto:105attendees@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees



-- 

Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist, Center for Democracy & Technology [https://www.cdt.org]
1401 K ST NW STE 200, Washington DC 20005-3497
e: joe@cdt.org <mailto:joe@cdt.org> , p: 202.407.8825, pgp: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
Fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871

 

 

-- 
Robert Moskowitz
Owner
HTT Consulting
C:      248-219-2059
F:      248-968-2824
E:      rgm@labs.htt-consult.com <mailto:rgm@labs.htt-consult.com> 

There's no limit to what can be accomplished if it doesn't matter who gets the credit