Re: [105attendees] Agenda Bashing was Re: Administrative Plenary Time Constraint: Must End by 21:00

john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Wed, 24 July 2019 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E443912047F; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zCS5MXNSgBIM; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7091205D3; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id A5C71CC7FB; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:37:23 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:37:23 +0000
From: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: 105attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, IAB <iab@iab.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190724173723.GG70671@shrubbery.net>
References: <556DAC1F-F4EB-4986-AFF2-F616376F77C3@ietf.org> <9f207e34-ed63-610c-98c9-7ef7a4543d42@comcast.net> <A9CE1857-CB50-401F-93A3-E89C567601EB@vpnc.org> <52017F86-D123-48B1-8A08-1E4C885C80A2@akamai.com> <20422AA6-BED4-4A7F-9083-1F9653BDD6CC@gmail.com> <16238.1563985779@dooku.sandelman.ca> <C50E71A6-0AC6-4D53-B2CC-B8D7F19488BD@fugue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <C50E71A6-0AC6-4D53-B2CC-B8D7F19488BD@fugue.com>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/105attendees/HrTQ-tBSk3ySxT1Q3KT-H48Vpps>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] Agenda Bashing was Re: Administrative Plenary Time Constraint: Must End by 21:00
X-BeenThere: 105attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <105attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/105attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:105attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 17:37:30 -0000

Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:39:20PM -0400, Ted Lemon:
> I think any kind of solution that involves peer pressure isn’t going to work well.
> 
> It might make sense for us to agree in advance to some questions we would like answered, and then ask the crowd to hum “I feel that this answer was adequate” and then “I feel this answer is not complete, please continue.”

I disagree with 7282.  I think humming is an awful approach to expressing
dis-/interest in any topic.  1) remote attendees can not hum, nor those
on maillists to which any question must be referred, and as/if there is a
move toward more remote participation then even fewer can hum.  2) anonymity
doesn't allow opponents (or proponent) to ask for explanation nor to attempt
to persuade.  3) non-, dis- & interest often sound equal, resulting in
nothing learned or the person with the largest diaphragm wins.

Humming should not be used/seen as a solution to behavioral problems.

This humming ritual should end.