Re: [105attendees] A few more IETF guides still needed (IoT anyone?)
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 19 July 2019 16:15 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F3A120809 for <105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W4cD7TU3uS6t for <105attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EBD2120804 for <105attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B07B423D42; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: 'Wes Hardaker' <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, "'105attendees@ietf.org'" <105attendees@ietf.org>
References: <ybla7datwo8.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E22EA01@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:15:15 -0700
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E22EA01@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> (BARBARA H. STARK's message of "Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:30:04 +0000")
Message-ID: <ybly30urofg.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/105attendees/JfRFKcdTYYkrgJTxgAoHKPfwMFE>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] A few more IETF guides still needed (IoT anyone?)
X-BeenThere: 105attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <105attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/105attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:105attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/105attendees>, <mailto:105attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:15:19 -0000
"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> writes: > Wes: Thx so much to you and the team for setting this up. Thanks Barbara, I'm certainty very happy you appreciate the new system. It makes our life quite a bit easier too. To give credit where it is absolutely due: though I've applied tweaks to the system, Robert Sparks designed and implemented everything shortly before 104 and his work on the system is greatly appreciated. He deserves all the credit for the new system. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [105attendees] A few more IETF guides still neede… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [105attendees] A few more IETF guides still n… STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [105attendees] A few more IETF guides still n… Wes Hardaker