Re: [105attendees] (re. plenary) measuring privacy, trusting devices and verifiability

Ted Lemon <> Wed, 24 July 2019 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2341120110 for <>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HBOUprczqEUn for <>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E1C1200FD for <>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r4so34975330qkm.13 for <>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=UE4Ku9ArIRzmCFWPdFfj2wYndqhcmiHdu9JGwbVlIpQ=; b=AeXK6HmL5z5pHa3dhFFdUNw3qUU3u9xQ+XvmUByASq6i+Yboc3/mFoCBDRFrvZXf7F SJsaRxU3LEPsPpH7lltATRFTSZJ5X77oJW1Cnxj64CELaWG3HUPdy4+G2xIOKzlFC43s UN6KUpwVPQLODxNkaVov35WNaSiUP4nXpOC9v7QgsW+olQpws1Q28sg3D1wmg0M4m1T6 gFO5saVc0enT4EqL+j+q7c1lU5b9yj9xXkm0N5J2mlcBrqa3hU7Xrwn53PI6iyzkJLtf KmZNo1lMSDb+hxZovHx6TCOOg2PYfxzAIMR0BVCV5vhFD2vzWsShNJ3reooWLNpxh1Uu bFxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=UE4Ku9ArIRzmCFWPdFfj2wYndqhcmiHdu9JGwbVlIpQ=; b=XaoHTzMsCGRxs+S8YwNAMXNBXY6MRhhK7j57iSBk5wXaR2NEF/jvzJOEqfngJkSkiR ZNejTOd9iR+LalDlKVrXr0k6l8lAJj0DLZYCGknwTC7Enk7XfETVynF9xjFtvuhlxyT2 +plne7jxGRe3dLWCQYlFS041fVLkbLrEHBNgjgU2uvWOxnbNsyiYSZgkzoTe04olqPvS KBfXqP11MqhAPt6UzxNx1ApSQSGanHpFfR9K8z4xpYSEmYEEvdtqLPHprvYCceKsFfiP iVCr7sagfxC2l47V++QtNX5BwKv99WfRwHfguhVM6sYJcefLfxYaQa5eHCMKheGhzjy7 ka3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVVstbe/DPVkVjGTfZtyEi65QUIGO5UgISmXy6hXBy7YbX4c99p ZPPPnKWDnV/KfiRam7/kQ7SvxUgrVYK+Ag==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxZ9MNZ3lcrYcYs8x6CfZJUIgRKRaXwbAmRUteMVFh0bLt8FmapLlOvyPaJT/bVxWGO0O8SZg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:90c2:: with SMTP id s185mr58997130qkd.161.1564009129711; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:8ca9:7e28:2132:6d06? ([2001:67c:370:128:8ca9:7e28:2132:6d06]) by with ESMTPSA id m5sm20070518qkb.117.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4ACA8370-3B12-4676-BF30-83EC58C44624"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:58:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <>
To: David Lamparter <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [105attendees] (re. plenary) measuring privacy, trusting devices and verifiability
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 105 attendees for official communication <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:58:53 -0000

On Jul 24, 2019, at 6:40 PM, David Lamparter <> wrote:
> The /only/ situation where I will trust (and recommend others to trust)
> any device is when I have the ability to build and compare the code that
> runs on it.

That’s great for you, but impractical for the average person.   The average person either has to just hope for the best, or has to pay someone who offers to provide this (what you do on your own) as a service.   There are lots of options for this—I believe it is how Canonical and Red Hat pay the bills.